Paper · 2013 · Nonwood Forest Research

Effects of trunk injection Zn fertilizer on growth and quality of Ziziphus Jujuba cv. Huizao from Xinjiang

Zhang Pin

11
claims
30
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In order to provide a theoretical basis for increasing yield and quality improvement Ziziphus Jujuba cv. Huizao from Xinjiang, Zn fertilizer application was increased at germination, flowering and fruit enlargement periods of Z. Jujuba cv. Huizao by using trunk injection fertilizer method, some growth indexes of tree were determined, and effects of Zn fertilizer on yield and quality of Z. Jujuba cv. Huizao from Xinjiang. The results show that the effect of applying 2.0 g Zn fertilizer per plant at different growth periods on promoting growth is the best. In the treatments, stem diameter increment, base stem diameter increment, shedding shoot increment, single fruit mass and yield are 1.12, 1.60, 1.23, 1.45 and 1.18 times of the contrast, Fe, Mn, Zn and Ca contents are 1.55, 1.38, 1.41 and 1.13 times of the contrast, and ratio of sugar to acid is 48.45. The other fertilizer treatments have promotion effects at different degrees on growth and quality of Z. Jujuba cv. Huizao. Trunk injection Zn fertilizer in Z. Jujuba cv. Huizao not only can promote growth of tree body, but also has a certain helpful to other nutritional quality improving.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 2.0 g Zn per plant, stem diameter increment was 1.12 times control.

Taxon
Ziziphus Jujuba cv. HuizaoZiziphus jujubat0
Treatment
2.0 g Zn fertilizer per plante0
Outcome
stem diameter incremente1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
1.12e1
Comparator
contraste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus jujuba
Ziziphus jujuba · TaxonRémi Tournebize · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applying 2.0 g Zn fertilizer per plant at different growth periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–527 · show in text ↑
e1

“stem diameter increment, base stem diameter increment, shedding shoot increment, single fruit mass and yield are 1.12, 1.60, 1.23, 1.45 and 1.18 times of the contrast”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–746 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ziziphus Jujuba cv. Huizao”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Base stem diameter increment was 1.60 times control.

Taxon
Ziziphus Jujuba cv. HuizaoZiziphus jujubat0
Treatment
2.0 g Zn fertilizer per plante0
Outcome
base stem diameter incremente1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
1.60e1
Comparator
contraste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus jujuba
Ziziphus jujuba · TaxonRémi Tournebize · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applying 2.0 g Zn fertilizer per plant at different growth periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–527 · show in text ↑
e1

“stem diameter increment, base stem diameter increment, shedding shoot increment, single fruit mass and yield are 1.12, 1.60, 1.23, 1.45 and 1.18 times of the contrast”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–746 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ziziphus Jujuba cv. Huizao”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shedding shoot increment was 1.23 times control.

Taxon
Ziziphus Jujuba cv. HuizaoZiziphus jujubat0
Treatment
2.0 g Zn fertilizer per plante0
Outcome
shedding shoot incremente1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
1.23e1
Comparator
contraste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus jujuba
Ziziphus jujuba · TaxonRémi Tournebize · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applying 2.0 g Zn fertilizer per plant at different growth periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–527 · show in text ↑
e1

“stem diameter increment, base stem diameter increment, shedding shoot increment, single fruit mass and yield are 1.12, 1.60, 1.23, 1.45 and 1.18 times of the contrast”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–746 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ziziphus Jujuba cv. Huizao”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single fruit mass was 1.45 times control.

Taxon
Ziziphus Jujuba cv. HuizaoZiziphus jujubat0
Treatment
2.0 g Zn fertilizer per plante0
Outcome
single fruit masse1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
1.45e1
Comparator
contraste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus jujuba
Ziziphus jujuba · TaxonRémi Tournebize · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applying 2.0 g Zn fertilizer per plant at different growth periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–527 · show in text ↑
e1

“stem diameter increment, base stem diameter increment, shedding shoot increment, single fruit mass and yield are 1.12, 1.60, 1.23, 1.45 and 1.18 times of the contrast”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–746 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ziziphus Jujuba cv. Huizao”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield was 1.18 times control.

Taxon
Ziziphus Jujuba cv. HuizaoZiziphus jujubat0
Treatment
2.0 g Zn fertilizer per plante0
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
1.18e1
Comparator
contraste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus jujuba
Ziziphus jujuba · TaxonRémi Tournebize · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applying 2.0 g Zn fertilizer per plant at different growth periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–527 · show in text ↑
e1

“stem diameter increment, base stem diameter increment, shedding shoot increment, single fruit mass and yield are 1.12, 1.60, 1.23, 1.45 and 1.18 times of the contrast”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–746 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ziziphus Jujuba cv. Huizao”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit Fe content was 1.55 times control.

Taxon
Ziziphus Jujuba cv. HuizaoZiziphus jujubat0
Treatment
2.0 g Zn fertilizer per plante0
Outcome
Fee1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
1.55e1
Comparator
contraste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus jujuba
Ziziphus jujuba · TaxonRémi Tournebize · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applying 2.0 g Zn fertilizer per plant at different growth periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–527 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fe, Mn, Zn and Ca contents are 1.55, 1.38, 1.41 and 1.13 times of the contrast”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–826 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ziziphus Jujuba cv. Huizao”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit Mn content was 1.38 times control.

Taxon
Ziziphus Jujuba cv. HuizaoZiziphus jujubat0
Treatment
2.0 g Zn fertilizer per plante0
Outcome
Mne1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
1.38e1
Comparator
contraste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus jujuba
Ziziphus jujuba · TaxonRémi Tournebize · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applying 2.0 g Zn fertilizer per plant at different growth periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–527 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fe, Mn, Zn and Ca contents are 1.55, 1.38, 1.41 and 1.13 times of the contrast”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–826 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ziziphus Jujuba cv. Huizao”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit Zn content was 1.41 times control.

Taxon
Ziziphus Jujuba cv. HuizaoZiziphus jujubat0
Treatment
2.0 g Zn fertilizer per plante0
Outcome
Zne1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
1.41e1
Comparator
contraste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus jujuba
Ziziphus jujuba · TaxonRémi Tournebize · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applying 2.0 g Zn fertilizer per plant at different growth periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–527 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fe, Mn, Zn and Ca contents are 1.55, 1.38, 1.41 and 1.13 times of the contrast”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–826 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ziziphus Jujuba cv. Huizao”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit Ca content was 1.13 times control.

Taxon
Ziziphus Jujuba cv. HuizaoZiziphus jujubat0
Treatment
2.0 g Zn fertilizer per plante0
Outcome
Ca contente1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
1.13e1
Comparator
contraste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus jujuba
Ziziphus jujuba · TaxonRémi Tournebize · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applying 2.0 g Zn fertilizer per plant at different growth periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–527 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fe, Mn, Zn and Ca contents are 1.55, 1.38, 1.41 and 1.13 times of the contrast”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–826 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ziziphus Jujuba cv. Huizao”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit sugar to acid ratio was 48.45.

Taxon
Ziziphus Jujuba cv. HuizaoZiziphus jujubat0
Outcome
ratio of sugar to acide0
Value
48.45e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus jujuba
Ziziphus jujuba · TaxonRémi Tournebize · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ratio of sugar to acid is 48.45”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–863 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ziziphus Jujuba cv. Huizao”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other zinc fertilizer treatments promoted growth and quality to varying degrees.

Taxon
Z. Jujuba cv. Huizaoe0
Treatment
other fertilizer treatmentse0
Outcome
growth and qualitye0
Direction
promotione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The other fertilizer treatments have promotion effects at different degrees on growth and quality of Z. Jujuba cv. Huizao”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–986 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · growth · Ziziphus jujuba (Chinese jujube)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Ziziphus jujuba (Chinese jujube)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Ziziphus jujuba (Chinese jujube)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Ziziphus jujuba (Chinese jujube)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · growth · Ziziphus jujuba (Chinese jujube)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

fertilization · yield · Ziziphus jujuba (Chinese jujube)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.