Paper · 2009

Control Effect of 2.4-D Amine Salf 72% AS Against Broad Leaf Weeds in Spring Wheat Field

Guo Liang

3
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The control effect for broad leaf weeds was above 85% with 72% 2,4-D amine salf AS at the rate of 450 to 750 mL·hm-2,which being sprayed in 4 leaves stage of broad leaf weeds. It was safe to spring wheat,and the yield of wheat increased above 13%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

72% 2,4-D amine salt at 450 to 750 mL/hm2 gave above 85% control of broad leaf weeds when sprayed at the four-leaf stage.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
72% 2,4-D amine salf AS at the rate of 450 to 750 mL·hm-2e1
Interactor
broad leaf weedse1weed
Outcome
control effect for broad leaf weedse1
Direction
abovee1
Value
above 85%e1
Setting
Spring Wheat Fieldt0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The control effect for broad leaf weeds was above 85% with 72% 2,4-D amine salf AS at the rate of 450 to 750 mL·hm-2,which being sprayed in 4 leaves stage of broad leaf weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–174 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat Field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2,4-D amine salt treatment was safe to spring wheat.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
72% 2,4-D amine salf AS at the rate of 450 to 750 mL·hm-2e1
Outcome
safe to spring wheate2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The control effect for broad leaf weeds was above 85% with 72% 2,4-D amine salf AS at the rate of 450 to 750 mL·hm-2,which being sprayed in 4 leaves stage of broad leaf weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–174 · show in text ↑
e2

“It was safe to spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–203 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat Field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield increased by above 13% with the 2,4-D amine salt treatment.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
72% 2,4-D amine salf AS at the rate of 450 to 750 mL·hm-2e1
Outcome
yield of wheate3
Direction
increasede3
Value
above 13%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The control effect for broad leaf weeds was above 85% with 72% 2,4-D amine salf AS at the rate of 450 to 750 mL·hm-2,which being sprayed in 4 leaves stage of broad leaf weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–174 · show in text ↑
e3

“the yield of wheat increased above 13%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–246 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat Field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–88 · show in text ↑

2,4-D · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

116 papers: 78 positive, 38 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

2,4-D · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

amine · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

2,4-D · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 64 positive, 2 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

amine · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.