Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Wheat yield increased by above 13% with the 2,4-D amine salt treatment.

A claim from Control Effect of 2.4-D Amine Salf 72% AS Against Broad Leaf Weeds in Spring Wheat Field · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield increased by above 13% with the 2,4-D amine salt treatment.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
72% 2,4-D amine salf AS at the rate of 450 to 750 mL·hm-2e1
Outcome
yield of wheate3
Direction
increasede3
Value
above 13%e3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The control effect for broad leaf weeds was above 85% with 72% 2,4-D amine salf AS at the rate of 450 to 750 mL·hm-2,which being sprayed in 4 leaves stage of broad leaf weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–174
e3

“the yield of wheat increased above 13%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–246
t0

“Spring Wheat Field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–88

Title

Control Effect of 2.4-D Amine Salf 72% AS Against Broad Leaf Weeds in Spring Wheat Field

Guo Liang 2009

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-56575eb207b3fe4fdfaebccee943a2b68b51e8e5a240a64beeeaa13d82f13c33 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

2,4-D · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

116 papers: 78 positive, 38 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this claim · 34 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

107 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

amine · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.