Paper · 2007

Sulphur Effect on Protein Components and Grain Yield of Wheat

Yushuang Yang

6
claims
8
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Based on the experiment in a plot of high soil fertility but low sulphur content with conventional fertilizer treatments(nitrogen,phosphate and potassium fertilizer),effect of sulphur on the protein quality and grain yield of the wheat cultivars with different protein contents were studied.A comparison was made between the grain protein content and grain yield with or without sulphur.The results indicated that the conventional fertilizer treatment with sulphur increased the nitrogen content in the wheat organs and kernel,and prolamin content and total protein content in kernel significantly.However,the wheat cultivars with different protein contents showed different reactions to sulphur fertilizer.The sulphur treatment significantly decreased the weight of 1000 grain kernels,but the decrease in grain yield did not reach a significant level.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur added to conventional fertilizer significantly increased nitrogen content in the wheat organs and kernel.

Treatment
conventional fertilizer treatment with sulphure0
Outcome
nitrogen content in the wheat organs and kernele0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results indicated that the conventional fertilizer treatment with sulphur increased the nitrogen content in the wheat organs and kernel,and prolamin content and total protein content in kernel significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–598 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur added to conventional fertilizer significantly increased prolamin content.

Treatment
conventional fertilizer treatment with sulphure0
Outcome
prolamin contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results indicated that the conventional fertilizer treatment with sulphur increased the nitrogen content in the wheat organs and kernel,and prolamin content and total protein content in kernel significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–598 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur added to conventional fertilizer significantly increased total protein content.

Treatment
conventional fertilizer treatment with sulphure0
Outcome
total protein contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results indicated that the conventional fertilizer treatment with sulphur increased the nitrogen content in the wheat organs and kernel,and prolamin content and total protein content in kernel significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–598 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat cultivars with different protein contents reacted differently to sulphur fertilizer.

Material
wheat cultivars with different protein contentse0
Outcome
different reactions to sulphur fertilizere0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However,the wheat cultivars with different protein contents showed different reactions to sulphur fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–707 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur significantly decreased 1000 grain kernel weight.

Treatment
sulphur treatmente0
Outcome
weight of 1000 grain kernelse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sulphur treatment significantly decreased the weight of 1000 grain kernels,but the decrease in grain yield did not reach a significant level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–852 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur decreased grain yield without a statistically significant difference.

Treatment
sulphur treatmente0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sulphur treatment significantly decreased the weight of 1000 grain kernels,but the decrease in grain yield did not reach a significant level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–852 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

51 papers: 44 positive, 7 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

sulfur atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

66 papers: 51 positive, 15 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

148 papers: 124 positive, 24 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 124 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

144 papers more in this group

See all 148 papers →

sulfur atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 36 positive, 3 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

288 papers: 232 positive, 56 negative or no effect

231 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

284 papers more in this group

See all 288 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

566 papers: 501 positive, 65 negative or no effect

500 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

562 papers more in this group

See all 566 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.