Paper · 2015 · Sugarcane and Canesugar

Effects of Application Rate of Nitrogen and Potassium Fertilizers on Different Sugarcane Varieties at Lateritic Soils

Xing Yin

9
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The optimum dosage of nitrogen and potassium fertilizer of different sugarcane varieties by different nitrogen and potassium ratio was determined. YT55, GT32 and Liucheng05-136 were selected as representatives of three strains, 4 different nitrogen and potassium ratio(low level 375 kg/hm2, high level 450 kg/hm2) were plotted to study the difference of nitrogen and potassium fertilizer on sugarcane growth, yield and nutrient uptake. The results showed that different nitrogen and potassium ratio had significant different effect to the emergence and tiller of different strains of sugarcane. performance. Low N, K level were beneficial for YT55's production, high N, K level were beneficial for GT32's production, high K level was beneficial for Liucheng05-136's production, but the difference was not significant. The total nitrogen and total phosphorus content were the highest in low N, K level of sugarcane, and the difference was significant. In different N, K levels, stems of different sugarcane varieties differed in total potassium content, and the difference was significant. At strong acidity lateritic red soils, more attention should be paid to ratio of N, K for different strains of sugarcane during seedling, tillering stage to facilitate the growth of sugarcane. But in the latter part of the growth stage, N, K only had a significant effect on single stem weight and was not the main obstacle affecting production in the region.Other nutrients or soil improvement was needed to increase cane production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Different nitrogen and potassium ratios had a significantly different effect on emergence and tillering of the sugarcane strains.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
different nitrogen and potassium ratioe0
Outcome
emergence and tillere0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“different nitrogen and potassium ratio had significant different effect to the emergence and tiller of different strains of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–593 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Low N, K level was beneficial for production of YT55, but the difference was not significant.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Material
YT55e0
Treatment
Low N, K levele0
Outcome
productione0
Direction
beneficiale0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Low N, K level were beneficial for YT55's production, high N, K level were beneficial for GT32's production, high K level was beneficial for Liucheng05-136's production, but the difference was not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–816 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High N, K level was beneficial for production of GT32, but the difference was not significant.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Material
GT32e0
Treatment
high N, K levele0
Outcome
productione0
Direction
beneficiale0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Low N, K level were beneficial for YT55's production, high N, K level were beneficial for GT32's production, high K level was beneficial for Liucheng05-136's production, but the difference was not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–816 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High K level was beneficial for production of Liucheng05-136, but the difference was not significant.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Material
Liucheng05-136e0
Treatment
high K levele0
Outcome
productione0
Direction
beneficiale0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Low N, K level were beneficial for YT55's production, high N, K level were beneficial for GT32's production, high K level was beneficial for Liucheng05-136's production, but the difference was not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–816 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total nitrogen and total phosphorus content of sugarcane were highest at the low N, K level, a significant difference.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
low N, K levele0
Outcome
total nitrogen and total phosphorus contente0
Direction
the higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The total nitrogen and total phosphorus content were the highest in low N, K level of sugarcane, and the difference was significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–949 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stems of different sugarcane varieties differed significantly in total potassium content across N, K levels.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Organ / stage
stemse0
Outcome
total potassium contente0
Qualifier
In different N, K levelse0

Verbatim

e0

“In different N, K levels, stems of different sugarcane varieties differed in total potassium content, and the difference was significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1087 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In the latter part of growth, N and K only had a significant effect on single stem weight.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
N, Ke0
Outcome
single stem weighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“in the latter part of the growth stage, N, K only had a significant effect on single stem weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1382 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–88 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

On strongly acidic lateritic red soils, more attention should be paid to the N, K ratio for sugarcane strains during seedling and tillering stages.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Outcome
ratio of N, Ke0
Setting
strong acidity lateritic red soilse0

Verbatim

e0

“At strong acidity lateritic red soils, more attention should be paid to ratio of N, K for different strains of sugarcane during seedling, tillering stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1242 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Other nutrients or soil improvement were needed to increase cane production in the region.

Taxon
canee0
Outcome
increase cane productione0

Verbatim

e0

“Other nutrients or soil improvement was needed to increase cane production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1522 · show in text ↑

potassium · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

57 papers: 50 positive, 7 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

137 papers: 118 positive, 19 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

133 papers more in this group

See all 137 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.