Paper · 2010 · Xiandai shipin keji

Effect of Postharvest Salicylic Acid Treatment on Color and Texture of Pear Fruit(Pyrus bretchneideri cv.Zaosu)

Junjie Wang; Yang Bi; Fan CunFei; et al.

13
claims
27
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Peel yellowing and pulp soften are two major causes of quality breakdown in harvested Zaosu pears.The fruit were vacuum permeated with salicylic acid(SA) at 4 mmol/L,3.2×104 Pa and 25 ℃ for 10min in order to evaluate effects of treatment on the color and texture of pears during room storage(25 ℃,RH 85-90%).The results showed that SA treatment increased color value,lightness and hue angle of peel.The treated fruit were 11.3% and 4.7% higher of color value after 14 and 21 days of storage when compared with the control.SA treatment can inhibited the degradation of chlorophyll content and increase of carotenoids in peel.Total chlorophyll content in treated fruit was 48.3% higher than that in control,while carotenoids content was 28.9% lower after 21 days of storage.The chemical delayed the decrease of hardness and fracture and inhibited raise of chewiness of pulp.The hardness and fracture of treated fruit were 14.7% and 25% higher than that in the control after 21 days of storage.It is suggested that SA can inhibit peel color yellowing by delaying of chlorophyll degradation and carotenoids synthesis,and can also maintain crisp texture of pulp by inhibit procedure of ripening of Zaosu pear.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA treatment increased pear peel color value, lightness and hue angle.

Organ / stage
peele0
Treatment
SA treatmente0
Outcome
color value,lightness and hue angle of peele0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SA treatment increased color value,lightness and hue angle of peel.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–399 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear Fruit(Pyrus bretchneideri cv.Zaosu)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated pears had 11.3% higher peel color value after 14 days than controls.

Treatment
treated fruite0
Outcome
color valuee0
Direction
highere0
Value
11.3%e0
Qualifier
14 and 21 days of storagee0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treated fruit were 11.3% and 4.7% higher of color value after 14 and 21 days of storage when compared with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–522 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear Fruit(Pyrus bretchneideri cv.Zaosu)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated pears had 4.7% higher peel color value after 21 days than controls.

Treatment
treated fruite0
Outcome
color valuee0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.7%e0
Qualifier
14 and 21 days of storagee0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treated fruit were 11.3% and 4.7% higher of color value after 14 and 21 days of storage when compared with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–522 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear Fruit(Pyrus bretchneideri cv.Zaosu)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA inhibited pear peel chlorophyll degradation.

Treatment
SA treatmente0
Outcome
degradation of chlorophyll contente0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SA treatment can inhibited the degradation of chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–587 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear Fruit(Pyrus bretchneideri cv.Zaosu)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA inhibited the increase of pear peel carotenoids.

Treatment
SA treatmentt1
Outcome
carotenoids in peele0
Direction
inhibitedt1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increase of carotenoids in peel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–623 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear Fruit(Pyrus bretchneideri cv.Zaosu)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–111 · show in text ↑
t1

“SA treatment can inhibited the degradation of chlorophyll content and increase of carotenoids in peel.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–624 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated fruit had 48.3% higher total chlorophyll than controls after 21 days.

Treatment
treated fruite0
Outcome
Total chlorophyll contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
48.3%e0
Qualifier
after 21 days of storagee0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total chlorophyll content in treated fruit was 48.3% higher than that in control,while carotenoids content was 28.9% lower after 21 days of storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–772 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear Fruit(Pyrus bretchneideri cv.Zaosu)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated fruit had 28.9% lower carotenoid content than controls after 21 days.

Treatment
treated fruite0
Outcome
carotenoids contente0
Direction
lowere0
Value
28.9%e0
Qualifier
after 21 days of storagee0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total chlorophyll content in treated fruit was 48.3% higher than that in control,while carotenoids content was 28.9% lower after 21 days of storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–772 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear Fruit(Pyrus bretchneideri cv.Zaosu)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA delayed the decline in pear pulp hardness and fracture.

Treatment
The chemicale0
Outcome
hardness and fracturee0
Direction
delayed the decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The chemical delayed the decrease of hardness and fracture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–830 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear Fruit(Pyrus bretchneideri cv.Zaosu)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA inhibited the rise in pear pulp chewiness.

Treatment
SAt1
Outcome
chewiness of pulpe0
Direction
inhibited raisee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inhibited raise of chewiness of pulp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–872 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear Fruit(Pyrus bretchneideri cv.Zaosu)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–111 · show in text ↑
t1

“SA treatment can inhibited the degradation of chlorophyll content and increase of carotenoids in peel.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–624 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated pears had 14.7% higher hardness than controls after 21 days.

Treatment
treated fruite0
Outcome
hardnesse0
Direction
highere0
Value
14.7%e0
Qualifier
after 21 days of storagee0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The hardness and fracture of treated fruit were 14.7% and 25% higher than that in the control after 21 days of storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–991 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear Fruit(Pyrus bretchneideri cv.Zaosu)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated pears had 25% higher fracture than controls after 21 days.

Treatment
treated fruite0
Outcome
fracturee0
Direction
highere0
Value
25%e0
Qualifier
after 21 days of storagee0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The hardness and fracture of treated fruit were 14.7% and 25% higher than that in the control after 21 days of storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–991 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear Fruit(Pyrus bretchneideri cv.Zaosu)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–111 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggest SA delays pear peel yellowing through delayed chlorophyll degradation and carotenoid synthesis.

Treatment
SAe0
Outcome
peel color yellowinge0
Qualifier
delaying of chlorophyll degradation and carotenoids synthesise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SA can inhibit peel color yellowing by delaying of chlorophyll degradation and carotenoids synthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1112 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear Fruit(Pyrus bretchneideri cv.Zaosu)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–111 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggest SA maintains pear pulp crisp texture by inhibiting ripening.

Taxon
Zaosu peare0
Outcome
crisp texture of pulpe0
Qualifier
inhibit procedure of ripeninge0

Verbatim

e0

“can also maintain crisp texture of pulp by inhibit procedure of ripening of Zaosu pear.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1204 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · physiology: pigments · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

salicylic acid · quality: postharvest · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.