Abstract
A factorial experiment with randomized complete block design carried out in Erbil governorate, Iraq during 2015 and 2016 seasons on pear (Pyrus Communis L.) Spadona and Compote cvs. to investigate the effects of spraying trees with (0, 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5%) salicylic acid (SA) on some fruits quantity and quality characteristics. The results show that Compote fruits had the highest weight and firmness significantly compared to Spadona fruits in both seasons, whereas Spadona variety records the highest total acidity. Fruits of Compote variety records higher chlorophyll a , chlorophyll b and total carotenoids content significantly compared to Spadona variety in 2015, in the opposite of the results of 2016 in respect to chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b. Spraying trees with SA increased fruit weight and firmness compare to control treatment for both seasons, and total acidity in 2015 and total sugars in 2016, whereas the differences were not significant in 2016 and 2015 for the last two properties. In 2015 spraying 1.5% SA increased each of chlorophyll a and b content significantly compared to other concentrations, whereas significant decrease in total carotenoids content observed with increasing SA concentration, whereas the differences between SA treatments were not significant in 2016 in respect to chlorophyll a, b and total carotenoids.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Compote pear fruit had greater weight and firmness than Spadona in both seasons.
- Taxon
- PEAR
Pyrus communist0 - Material
- Compotee0
- Outcome
- weight and firmnesse0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Qualifier
- both seasonse0
- Comparator
- Spadonae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Compote fruits had the highest weight and firmness significantly compared to Spadona fruits in both seasons”
t0“PEAR FRUITS”
Claim · model-written summary
Spadona pear fruit had the highest total acidity.
- Taxon
- PEAR
Pyrus communist0 - Material
- Spadonae0
- Outcome
- total aciditye0
- Direction
- higheste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Spadona variety records the highest total acidity.”
t0“PEAR FRUITS”
Claim · model-written summary
Compote fruit had higher chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and carotenoids than Spadona in 2015.
- Taxon
- PEAR
Pyrus communist0 - Material
- Compotee0
- Outcome
- chlorophyll a , chlorophyll b and total carotenoids contente0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- 2015e0
- Comparator
- Spadonae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Fruits of Compote variety records higher chlorophyll a , chlorophyll b and total carotenoids content significantly compared to Spadona variety in 2015”
t0“PEAR FRUITS”
Claim · model-written summary
The cultivar pattern for chlorophyll a and b was reversed in 2016.
- Taxon
- PEAR
Pyrus communist0 - Material
- Compotee1
- Outcome
- chlorophyll a and chlorophyll be0
- Direction
- oppositee0
- Qualifier
- 2016e0
- Comparator
- Spadonae1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“in the opposite of the results of 2016 in respect to chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b.”
e1“Fruits of Compote variety records higher chlorophyll a , chlorophyll b and total carotenoids content significantly compared to Spadona variety in 2015”
t0“PEAR FRUITS”
Claim · model-written summary
Salicylic acid spraying increased pear fruit weight and firmness versus control in both seasons.
- Taxon
- PEAR
Pyrus communist0 - Treatment
- Spraying trees with SAe0
- Outcome
- fruit weight and firmnesse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- both seasonse0
- Comparator
- control treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Spraying trees with SA increased fruit weight and firmness compare to control treatment for both seasons”
t0“PEAR FRUITS”
Claim · model-written summary
Salicylic acid spraying increased pear fruit total acidity in 2015.
- Taxon
- PEAR
Pyrus communist0 - Treatment
- Spraying trees with SAe1
- Outcome
- total aciditye0
- Direction
- increasede1
- Qualifier
- 2015e0
- Comparator
- control treatmente1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“and total acidity in 2015 and total sugars in 2016”
e1“Spraying trees with SA increased fruit weight and firmness compare to control treatment for both seasons”
t0“PEAR FRUITS”
Claim · model-written summary
Salicylic acid spraying increased pear fruit total sugars in 2016.
- Taxon
- PEAR
Pyrus communist0 - Treatment
- Spraying trees with SAe1
- Outcome
- total sugarse0
- Direction
- increasede1
- Qualifier
- 2016e0
- Comparator
- control treatmente1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“and total acidity in 2015 and total sugars in 2016”
e1“Spraying trees with SA increased fruit weight and firmness compare to control treatment for both seasons”
t0“PEAR FRUITS”
Claim · model-written summary
Salicylic acid effects on total acidity in 2016 and sugars in 2015 were not significant.
- Taxon
- PEAR
Pyrus communist0 - Treatment
- Spraying trees with SAe2
- Outcome
- total aciditye1
- Direction
- not significante0
- Qualifier
- 2016 and 2015e0
- Comparator
- control treatmente2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“whereas the differences were not significant in 2016 and 2015 for the last two properties.”
e1“and total acidity in 2015 and total sugars in 2016”
e2“Spraying trees with SA increased fruit weight and firmness compare to control treatment for both seasons”
t0“PEAR FRUITS”
Claim · model-written summary
The 1.5% salicylic acid treatment increased pear fruit chlorophyll a and b in 2015 versus other concentrations.
- Taxon
- PEAR
Pyrus communist0 - Treatment
- spraying 1.5% SAe0
- Outcome
- chlorophyll a and b contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- 2015e0
- Comparator
- other concentrationse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“In 2015 spraying 1.5% SA increased each of chlorophyll a and b content significantly compared to other concentrations”
t0“PEAR FRUITS”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing salicylic acid concentration significantly decreased pear fruit carotenoids in 2015.
- Taxon
- PEAR
Pyrus communist0 - Treatment
- increasing SA concentratione0
- Outcome
- total carotenoids contente0
- Direction
- decreasee0
- Qualifier
- 2015e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“significant decrease in total carotenoids content observed with increasing SA concentration”
e1“In 2015 spraying 1.5% SA increased each of chlorophyll a and b content significantly compared to other concentrations”
t0“PEAR FRUITS”
Claim · model-written summary
Salicylic acid treatments did not differ significantly in pear fruit chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b or carotenoids in 2016.
- Taxon
- PEAR
Pyrus communist0 - Treatment
- SA treatmentse0
- Outcome
- chlorophyll a, b and total carotenoidse0
- Direction
- not significante0
- Qualifier
- 2016e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“the differences between SA treatments were not significant in 2016 in respect to chlorophyll a, b and total carotenoids.”
t0“PEAR FRUITS”
The same questions in other papers
salicylic acid · quality: sugar starch · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
salicylic acid · physiology: pigments · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
salicylic acid · quality: postharvest · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →application · quality: postharvest · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →application · quality: sugar starch · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →application · physiology: pigments · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.