Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Environment and Climate Change

Storability and Quality Attributes of Pear (Pyrus communis L.) cv. Carmen Fruits at Ambient Storage Conditions as Influenced by Foliar Application of Salicylic Acid and Calcium Chloride

Mehnigar Hamid; Angrej Ali; Amit Kumar; et al.

6
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An investigation was carried out to examine the storage behaviour and biochemical quality of pear (Pyrus communis L.) fruits cv. Carmen raised on Quince C rootstock as affected by pre-harvest foliar application of salicylic acid and calcium chloride treatments. The treatments consisted of four levels each of salicylic acid (0, 100, 150 and 200 ppm) and Calcium chloride (0, 0.20, 0.25 and 0.30 %). The experiment was laid out in Randomized Complete Block Design in factorial arrangements with three replications. The treatments were applied as a foliar spray at 3, 6 and 9 weeks after the petal fall. Control plants were sprayed with water. After harvest, fruits were stored under ambient conditions for 7, 14 and 21 days. Postharvest physiological loss in weight (PLW), rotting percentage, total soluble solids, total sugars and reducing sugars in fruits was increased. In contrast, fruit firmness, titratable acidity and ascorbic acid content decreased with an increase over storage periods. Salicylic acid @ 200 ppm and calcium chloride @ 0.30 % resulted minimum physiological loss in weight and rotting percentage. Also, salicylic acid @ 200 ppm and calcium chloride @ 0.30 % were effective in minimizing the loss of fruit firmness, titrable acidity and ascorbic acid content. In conclusion, the salicylic acid @ 200 ppm and calcium chloride @ 0.30 % were found to be effective in improving pear cv. Carmen fruits storability by reducing physiological loss in weight and fruit rotting; and maintaining the biochemical quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Physiological weight loss, rotting, soluble solids and sugar measures increased during storage.

Material
Carmene2
Organ / stage
fruitse2
Outcome
physiological loss in weight (PLW), rotting percentage, total soluble solids, total sugars and reducing sugarse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
storage periodse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Postharvest physiological loss in weight (PLW), rotting percentage, total soluble solids, total sugars and reducing sugars in fruits was increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–871 · show in text ↑
e1

“with an increase over storage periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–994 · show in text ↑
e2

“pear (Pyrus communis L.) fruits cv. Carmen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–135 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit firmness, titratable acidity and ascorbic acid content decreased with longer storage.

Material
Carmene1
Organ / stage
fruitse1
Outcome
fruit firmness, titratable acidity and ascorbic acid contente0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
storage periodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit firmness, titratable acidity and ascorbic acid content decreased with an increase over storage periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–994 · show in text ↑
e1

“pear (Pyrus communis L.) fruits cv. Carmen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic acid at 200 ppm minimized physiological weight loss and fruit rotting.

Material
Carmene1
Treatment
Salicylic acid @ 200 ppme0
Outcome
physiological loss in weight and rotting percentagee0
Direction
minimume0
Comparator
Control plantse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salicylic acid @ 200 ppm and calcium chloride @ 0.30 % resulted minimum physiological loss in weight and rotting percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1119 · show in text ↑
e1

“pear (Pyrus communis L.) fruits cv. Carmen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–135 · show in text ↑
e2

“Control plants were sprayed with water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–641 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium chloride at 0.30% minimized physiological weight loss and fruit rotting.

Material
Carmene1
Treatment
calcium chloride @ 0.30 %e0
Outcome
physiological loss in weight and rotting percentagee0
Direction
minimume0
Comparator
Control plantse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salicylic acid @ 200 ppm and calcium chloride @ 0.30 % resulted minimum physiological loss in weight and rotting percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1119 · show in text ↑
e1

“pear (Pyrus communis L.) fruits cv. Carmen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–135 · show in text ↑
e2

“Control plants were sprayed with water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–641 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic acid at 200 ppm minimized losses of firmness, titratable acidity and ascorbic acid.

Material
Carmene1
Treatment
salicylic acid @ 200 ppme0
Outcome
loss of fruit firmness, titrable acidity and ascorbic acid contente0
Direction
minimizinge0
Comparator
Control plantse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salicylic acid @ 200 ppm and calcium chloride @ 0.30 % were effective in minimizing the loss of fruit firmness, titrable acidity and ascorbic acid content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1281 · show in text ↑
e1

“pear (Pyrus communis L.) fruits cv. Carmen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–135 · show in text ↑
e2

“Control plants were sprayed with water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–641 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium chloride at 0.30% minimized losses of firmness, titratable acidity and ascorbic acid.

Material
Carmene1
Treatment
calcium chloride @ 0.30 %e0
Outcome
loss of fruit firmness, titrable acidity and ascorbic acid contente0
Direction
minimizinge0
Comparator
Control plantse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salicylic acid @ 200 ppm and calcium chloride @ 0.30 % were effective in minimizing the loss of fruit firmness, titrable acidity and ascorbic acid content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1281 · show in text ↑
e1

“pear (Pyrus communis L.) fruits cv. Carmen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–135 · show in text ↑
e2

“Control plants were sprayed with water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–641 · show in text ↑

calcium chloride dihydrate · quality: sugar starch · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

salicylic acid · disease · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

salicylic acid · quality: sugar starch · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

calcium chloride dihydrate · disease · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.