Paper · 2004 · ACTA AGRONOMICA SINICA

Effects of Post-anthesis Drought and Waterlogging on Photosynthetic Characteristics,Assimilates Transportation in Winter Wheat

Xie Zhu

19
claims
38
verbatim quotes
19
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Four winter wheat( Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes differing in grain protein content, Heixiaomai 76, Wanmai 38, Yangmai 10 and Yangmai 9, were used in pot experiment in greenhouse to investigate the effects of drought (Soil relative water content, SRWC=45%-50%), waterlogging and moderate soil water status (SRWC=75%-80%) after anthesis on net photosynthesis and chlorophyll contents of flag leaves, remobilization of assimilates stored before anthesis, transportation of post-anthesis assimilates, and contents and yields of starch and protein in grain at maturity. It was found that the photosynthetic active duration (PAD) and the relative steady phase of chlorophyll content( RSP) of flag leaves of four wheat genotypes were shortened by both drought and waterlogging. Values of PAD and RSP declined from CK, via waterlogging then drought. The remobilization rate of pre-anthesis stored assimilates was the highest for CK, while the lowest for waterlogging. The amounts of post-anthesis assimilates and accumulated nitrogen transferring into grain were declined as CKwaterloggingdrought and CKdroughtwaterlogging, respectively. The yield of grain protein significantly decreased at 5% level with the order of CK drought waterlogging in four wheat genotypes. The contents of grain protein increased significantly under drought, but had no significant difference between CK and waterlogging. Compared with CK, starch yield significantly decreased under drought and waterlogging in four wheat genotypes, but starch content was various among four wheat genotypes. These results showed that the amount of post-anthesis assimilates transferring into grain decreased distinctly under drought, while the remobilization of pre-anthesis stored nitrogen and the transferring of post-anthesis accumulated nitrogen into grain declined distinctly under waterlogging, which led to differences in protein and starch contents of wheat grains under post-anthesis drought and waterlogging. It is inferred that the transferring of post-anthesis accumulated nitrogen into grain and the remobilization of pre-anthesis stored nitrogen were vital factors to determine protein yield under the drought and waterlogging condition, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought shortened flag-leaf photosynthetic active duration.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
flag leavese0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
photosynthetic active duratione0
Direction
shortenede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“photosynthetic active duration (PAD) and the relative steady phase of chlorophyll content( RSP) of flag leaves of four wheat genotypes were shortened by both drought and waterlogging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–772 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging shortened flag-leaf photosynthetic active duration.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
photosynthetic active duratione0
Direction
shortenede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“photosynthetic active duration (PAD) and the relative steady phase of chlorophyll content( RSP) of flag leaves of four wheat genotypes were shortened by both drought and waterlogging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–772 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought shortened the relative steady phase of flag-leaf chlorophyll content.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
relative steady phase of chlorophyll contente0
Direction
shortenede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“photosynthetic active duration (PAD) and the relative steady phase of chlorophyll content( RSP) of flag leaves of four wheat genotypes were shortened by both drought and waterlogging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–772 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging shortened the relative steady phase of flag-leaf chlorophyll content.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
relative steady phase of chlorophyll contente0
Direction
shortenede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“photosynthetic active duration (PAD) and the relative steady phase of chlorophyll content( RSP) of flag leaves of four wheat genotypes were shortened by both drought and waterlogging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–772 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic active duration and chlorophyll steady-phase duration were highest in controls, intermediate under waterlogging, and lowest under drought.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
Values of PAD and RSPe0
Direction
declinede0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“Values of PAD and RSP declined from CK, via waterlogging then drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–843 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Remobilization of pre-anthesis stored assimilates was highest in controls and lowest under waterlogging.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
remobilization rate of pre-anthesis stored assimilatese0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“The remobilization rate of pre-anthesis stored assimilates was the highest for CK, while the lowest for waterlogging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–961 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-anthesis assimilates transferred into grain ranked control, waterlogging, then drought.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
amounts of post-anthesis assimilatese0
Direction
declinede0
Qualifier
CKwaterloggingdroughte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“The amounts of post-anthesis assimilates and accumulated nitrogen transferring into grain were declined as CKwaterloggingdrought and CKdroughtwaterlogging, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Accumulated nitrogen transferred into grain ranked control, drought, then waterlogging.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
accumulated nitrogen transferring into graine0
Direction
declinede0
Qualifier
CKdroughtwaterlogginge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“The amounts of post-anthesis assimilates and accumulated nitrogen transferring into grain were declined as CKwaterloggingdrought and CKdroughtwaterlogging, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain protein yield decreased significantly from control to drought to waterlogging across four genotypes.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
drought waterlogginge0
Outcome
yield of grain proteine0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
5% levele0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“The yield of grain protein significantly decreased at 5% level with the order of CK drought waterlogging in four wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1261 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly increased grain protein content.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
contents of grain proteine0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“The contents of grain protein increased significantly under drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1330 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain protein content did not differ significantly between control and waterlogging.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
no significant differencee0
Comparator
CKe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“had no significant difference between CK and waterlogging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1393 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Starch yield significantly decreased under drought compared with control.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
starch yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compared with CK, starch yield significantly decreased under drought and waterlogging in four wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1395–1504 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Starch yield significantly decreased under waterlogging compared with control.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
starch yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compared with CK, starch yield significantly decreased under drought and waterlogging in four wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1395–1504 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Starch content varied among the four wheat genotypes.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
starch contente0
Direction
variouse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“starch content was various among four wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1563 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought distinctly decreased post-anthesis assimilate transfer into grain.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
amount of post-anthesis assimilates transferring into graine0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“the amount of post-anthesis assimilates transferring into grain decreased distinctly under drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1591–1689 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging distinctly decreased remobilization of pre-anthesis stored nitrogen.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
remobilization of pre-anthesis stored nitrogene0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“the remobilization of pre-anthesis stored nitrogen and the transferring of post-anthesis accumulated nitrogen into grain declined distinctly under waterlogging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1697–1856 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging distinctly decreased transfer of post-anthesis accumulated nitrogen into grain.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
transferring of post-anthesis accumulated nitrogen into graine0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“the remobilization of pre-anthesis stored nitrogen and the transferring of post-anthesis accumulated nitrogen into grain declined distinctly under waterlogging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1697–1856 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that post-anthesis accumulated nitrogen transfer determines protein yield under drought.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
protein yielde0
Qualifier
transferring of post-anthesis accumulated nitrogen into graine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“the transferring of post-anthesis accumulated nitrogen into grain and the remobilization of pre-anthesis stored nitrogen were vital factors to determine protein yield under the drought and waterlogging condition, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1996–2221 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that remobilization of pre-anthesis stored nitrogen determines protein yield under waterlogging.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
protein yielde0
Qualifier
remobilization of pre-anthesis stored nitrogene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“the transferring of post-anthesis accumulated nitrogen into grain and the remobilization of pre-anthesis stored nitrogen were vital factors to determine protein yield under the drought and waterlogging condition, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1996–2221 · show in text ↑

flooding · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

19 papers: 1 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

flooding · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

44 papers: 7 positive, 37 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

drought · quality: sugar starch · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

52 papers: 11 positive, 41 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

drought · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

60 papers: 32 positive, 28 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

flooding · quality: sugar starch · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 3 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

flooding · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 2 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

drought · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

131 papers: 16 positive, 115 negative or no effect

114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

246 papers: 41 positive, 205 negative or no effect

204 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

242 papers more in this group

See all 246 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.