Paper · 2016 · Scientific Reports

Responses of corn physiology and yield to six agricultural practices over three years in middle Tennessee

Chih-Li Yu; Dafeng Hui; Qi Deng; et al.

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
31
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Different agricultural practices may have substantial impacts on crop physiology and yield. However, it is still not entirely clear how multiple agricultural practices such as tillage, biochar and different nutrient applications could influence corn physiology and yield. We conducted a three-year field experiment to study the responses of corn physiology, yield, and soil respiration to six different agricultural practices. The six treatments included conventional tillage (CT) or no tillage (NT), in combination with nitrogen type (URAN or chicken litter) and application method, biochar, or denitrification inhibitor. A randomized complete block design was applied with six replications. Leaf photosynthetic rate, transpiration, plant height, leaf area index (LAI), biomass, and yield were measured. Results showed that different agricultural practices had significant effects on plant leaf photosynthesis, transpiration, soil respiration, height, and yield, but not on LAI and biomass. The average corn yield in the NT-URAN was 10.03 ton/ha, 28.9% more than in the CT-URAN. Compared to the NT-URAN, the NT-biochar had lower soil respiration and similar yield. All variables measured showed remarkable variations among the three years. Our results indicated that no tillage treatment substantially increased corn yield, probably due to the preservation of soil moisture during drought periods.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Agricultural practices significantly affected leaf photosynthesis, transpiration, soil respiration, height and yield.

Treatment
different agricultural practicese0
Outcome
plant leaf photosynthesis, transpiration, soil respiration, height, and yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“different agricultural practices had significant effects on plant leaf photosynthesis, transpiration, soil respiration, height, and yield, but not on LAI and biomass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–991 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Agricultural practices did not significantly affect leaf area index or biomass.

Treatment
different agricultural practicese0
Outcome
LAI and biomasse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“different agricultural practices had significant effects on plant leaf photosynthesis, transpiration, soil respiration, height, and yield, but not on LAI and biomass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–991 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage with URAN yielded 10.03 ton/ha, 28.9% more than conventional tillage with URAN.

Treatment
NT-URANe0
Outcome
corn yielde0
Direction
moree0
Value
10.03 ton/hae0
Qualifier
28.9%e0
Comparator
CT-URANe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average corn yield in the NT-URAN was 10.03 ton/ha, 28.9% more than in the CT-URAN.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1079 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage with biochar lowered soil respiration relative to no tillage with URAN.

Treatment
NT-biochare0
Outcome
soil respiratione0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
NT-URANe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the NT-URAN, the NT-biochar had lower soil respiration and similar yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1165 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage with biochar produced similar yield to no tillage with URAN.

Treatment
NT-biochare0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
NT-URANe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the NT-URAN, the NT-biochar had lower soil respiration and similar yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1165 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–17 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All measured variables varied among the three years.

Outcome
All variables measurede0
Setting
three yearse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All variables measured showed remarkable variations among the three years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1240 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–17 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attributed increased corn yield under no tillage to soil moisture preservation during drought.

Treatment
no tillage treatmente0
Outcome
corn yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
probably due to the preservation of soil moisture during drought periodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no tillage treatment substantially increased corn yield, probably due to the preservation of soil moisture during drought periods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1398 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.