Abstract
An experiment was carried out during kharif 2011 to study the responseof kharif sorghum to soil and foliar application of micronutrient zinc and iron at Sorghum Research Station, V.N. Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design (RBD) with 10 treatments and three replications. Results revealed that zinc sulphate and ferrous sulphate micronutrient through soil and foliar application along with recommended dose of NPK fertilizers resulted in improvement of kharif sorghum grain and fodder yield. Quality parameters like crude protein, crude fiber, crude fat, moisture content, starch, soluble sugar, ash content, approximate calorific value of grain and crude protein, dietary fiber, ash, organic matter, ether extract, nitrogen free extract of fodder were also improved due to soil and foliar application of micronutrients along with RDF. Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium concentration in sorghum fodder was markedly increased by application of RDF along with micronutrients. The treatment T7 i.e. RDF + soil application of 15 kg ZnSO4 + 15 kg FeSO4/ha recorded highest % N(0.65), % P (0.49)and % K (0.82)in fodder, whereas highest N, P and K in harvested grainswas noted as1.55, 0.88 and 0.41kg/ha, respectively. Total uptake of major nutrients was also recorded as nitrogen (50.79 kg/ha), phosphorus (31.85 kg/ha) and potassium (32.29 kg/ha).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
Micronutrient application with NPK improved grain and fodder yield.
- Treatment
- zinc sulphate and ferrous sulphate micronutrient through soil and foliar application along with recommended dose of NPK fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- grain and fodder yielde0
- Direction
- improvemente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“zinc sulphate and ferrous sulphate micronutrient through soil and foliar application along with recommended dose of NPK fertilizers resulted in improvement of kharif sorghum grain and fodder yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Micronutrients with RDF improved grain quality measures.
- Treatment
- soil and foliar application of micronutrients along with RDFe0
- Outcome
- crude protein, crude fiber, crude fate0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Quality parameters like crude protein, crude fiber, crude fat, moisture content, starch, soluble sugar, ash content, approximate calorific value of grain and crude protein, dietary fiber, ash, organic matter, ether extract, nitrogen free extract of fodder were also improved due to soil and foliar application of micronutrients along with RDF”
t0“sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
Micronutrients with RDF improved grain starch, sugar and ash content.
- Treatment
- soil and foliar application of micronutrients along with RDFe0
- Outcome
- starch, soluble sugar, ash contente0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Quality parameters like crude protein, crude fiber, crude fat, moisture content, starch, soluble sugar, ash content, approximate calorific value of grain and crude protein, dietary fiber, ash, organic matter, ether extract, nitrogen free extract of fodder were also improved due to soil and foliar application of micronutrients along with RDF”
t0“sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
Micronutrients with RDF improved fodder protein, fiber and ash.
- Treatment
- soil and foliar application of micronutrients along with RDFe0
- Outcome
- crude protein, dietary fiber, ashe0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Quality parameters like crude protein, crude fiber, crude fat, moisture content, starch, soluble sugar, ash content, approximate calorific value of grain and crude protein, dietary fiber, ash, organic matter, ether extract, nitrogen free extract of fodder were also improved due to soil and foliar application of micronutrients along with RDF”
t0“sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
Micronutrients with RDF improved fodder organic matter, ether extract and nitrogen-free extract.
- Treatment
- soil and foliar application of micronutrients along with RDFe0
- Outcome
- organic matter, ether extract, nitrogen free extracte0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Quality parameters like crude protein, crude fiber, crude fat, moisture content, starch, soluble sugar, ash content, approximate calorific value of grain and crude protein, dietary fiber, ash, organic matter, ether extract, nitrogen free extract of fodder were also improved due to soil and foliar application of micronutrients along with RDF”
t0“sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF plus micronutrients increased N, P and K concentration in fodder.
- Treatment
- application of RDF along with micronutrientse0
- Outcome
- Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium concentration in sorghum foddere0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium concentration in sorghum fodder was markedly increased by application of RDF along with micronutrients”
Claim · model-written summary
T7 produced the highest fodder nitrogen of 0.65%.
- Treatment
- RDF + soil application of 15 kg ZnSO4 + 15 kg FeSO4/hae0
- Outcome
- % Ne0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 0.65e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The treatment T7 i.e. RDF + soil application of 15 kg ZnSO4 + 15 kg FeSO4/ha recorded highest % N(0.65), % P (0.49)and % K (0.82)in fodder”
t0“sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
T7 produced fodder phosphorus of 0.49%.
- Treatment
- RDF + soil application of 15 kg ZnSO4 + 15 kg FeSO4/hae0
- Outcome
- % Pe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 0.49e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The treatment T7 i.e. RDF + soil application of 15 kg ZnSO4 + 15 kg FeSO4/ha recorded highest % N(0.65), % P (0.49)and % K (0.82)in fodder”
t0“sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
T7 produced fodder potassium of 0.82%.
- Treatment
- RDF + soil application of 15 kg ZnSO4 + 15 kg FeSO4/hae0
- Outcome
- % Ke0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 0.82e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The treatment T7 i.e. RDF + soil application of 15 kg ZnSO4 + 15 kg FeSO4/ha recorded highest % N(0.65), % P (0.49)and % K (0.82)in fodder”
t0“sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
Harvested grain nitrogen was highest at 1.55.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“highest N, P and K in harvested grainswas noted as1.55, 0.88 and 0.41kg/ha, respectively”
t0“sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
Harvested grain phosphorus was highest at 0.88.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“highest N, P and K in harvested grainswas noted as1.55, 0.88 and 0.41kg/ha, respectively”
t0“sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
Harvested grain potassium was highest at 0.41kg/ha.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“highest N, P and K in harvested grainswas noted as1.55, 0.88 and 0.41kg/ha, respectively”
t0“sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
Total nitrogen uptake was 50.79 kg/ha.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Total uptake of major nutrients was also recorded as nitrogen (50.79 kg/ha), phosphorus (31.85 kg/ha) and potassium (32.29 kg/ha)”
t0“sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
Total phosphorus uptake was 31.85 kg/ha.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Total uptake of major nutrients was also recorded as nitrogen (50.79 kg/ha), phosphorus (31.85 kg/ha) and potassium (32.29 kg/ha)”
t0“sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
Total potassium uptake was 32.29 kg/ha.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Total uptake of major nutrients was also recorded as nitrogen (50.79 kg/ha), phosphorus (31.85 kg/ha) and potassium (32.29 kg/ha)”
t0“sorghum”
The same questions in other papers
sulfate · yield · SorghumResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
zinc sulfate · yield · SorghumResults agree
13 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →micronutrient · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →application · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results
80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
84 papers more in this group
See all 88 papers →fertilization · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results
417 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
442 papers more in this group
See all 446 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.