Paper · 1977 · Annals of Botany

Effects of Root Restriction, Root Pruning and 6-Benzylaminopurine on the Growth of Peach Seedlings

D. RICHARDS; R. N. ROWE

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
159
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Peach seedlings were grown in aerated nutrient solution in small (15 cm3) or large (500 cm3) containers. Subsequently some plants were removed from the small to the large containers or were stressed by root pruning. Half the plants received a foliar spray of 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) every 4 days. Root restriction eventually impaired growth rates and ultimately plant size. The effect of root pruning was quickly overcome by a redistribution of growth in favour of the roots. When restricted plants were transferred into large containers there was an accompanying rapid root growth and plants attained a comparable size to unrestricted plants. BAP applied to the leaves to some extent overcame the reduced growth of restricted plants, however, its major effect was on the distribution of dry matter. Restriction and BAP application, in general, reduced the levels of mineral nutrients in the leaves. It is argued that the limit set by the roots on top growth involves an internal regulation by the root, in particular the production and supply of growth substances. The evidence suggests that this is related to root morphology and must be taken into account when studying top:root inter-relationships. The experiment highlights the importance of root restriction as a technique for manipulating root growth and studying root function and its interaction with the top. Some implications of controlled root growth in the field are discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root restriction impaired growth rate and final plant size.

Treatment
Root restrictione0
Outcome
growth rates and ultimately plant sizee0
Direction
impairede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root restriction eventually impaired growth rates and ultimately plant size.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–375 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root pruning was followed by rapid recovery through growth redistribution toward roots.

Treatment
root pruninge0
Outcome
redistribution of growth in favour of the rootse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of root pruning was quickly overcome by a redistribution of growth in favour of the roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–477 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transfer of restricted plants to large containers caused rapid root growth.

Treatment
transferred into large containerse0
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
rapide0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When restricted plants were transferred into large containers there was an accompanying rapid root growth and plants attained a comparable size to unrestricted plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–645 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transferred plants reached a size comparable with unrestricted plants.

Treatment
transferred into large containerse0
Outcome
sizee0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
unrestricted plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When restricted plants were transferred into large containers there was an accompanying rapid root growth and plants attained a comparable size to unrestricted plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–645 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar BAP partly overcame growth reduction in restricted plants.

Treatment
BAP applied to the leavese0
Outcome
reduced growth of restricted plantse0
Direction
overcamee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BAP applied to the leaves to some extent overcame the reduced growth of restricted plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–735 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar BAP mainly affected dry matter distribution.

Treatment
BAPe1
Outcome
distribution of dry mattere0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“its major effect was on the distribution of dry matter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–801 · show in text ↑
t0

“6-Benzylaminopurine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–65 · show in text ↑
t1

“Peach Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“BAP applied to the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–671 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Restriction reduced mineral nutrient levels in leaves.

Treatment
Restrictione0
Outcome
levels of mineral nutrients in the leavese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Restriction and BAP application, in general, reduced the levels of mineral nutrients in the leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–901 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BAP reduced mineral nutrient levels in leaves.

Treatment
BAP applicatione0
Outcome
levels of mineral nutrients in the leavese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Restriction and BAP application, in general, reduced the levels of mineral nutrients in the leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–901 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–98 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors argue that root control of top growth involves supply of growth substances.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
top growthe0
Qualifier
production and supply of growth substancese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It is argued that the limit set by the roots on top growth involves an internal regulation by the root, in particular the production and supply of growth substances.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1067 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–98 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors relate the root effect to root morphology.

Outcome
root morphologye0
Qualifier
related to root morphologye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The evidence suggests that this is related to root morphology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1129 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–98 · show in text ↑

N-benzyladenine · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

24 papers: 20 positive, 4 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.