Paper · 2016

Effect of Spring Applied Urea and Calcium Ammonium Nitrate on White Clover (Trifolium repens) Performance in a Grazed Ryegrass-Clover Pasture

Paul Murphy; Simon R. Turner; M.R. Murphy

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The application of 50 kg N/ha in March as urea or calcium ammonium nitrate for early season herbage production was studied for its effects on white clover productivity in terms of clover dry matter production and nitrogen fixation capacity. Average clover content in the sward throughout the year was 15.4 and 15.1% for the urea and calcium ammonium nitrate treatments, respectively, compared with 21.3% for the zero N (control) treatment. Total clover production was 1.52 t/ha for the urea and 1.51 for calcium ammonium nitrate treatments compared with 2.00 t/ha for the control. The control plots fixed 194 kg N/ha/an, the corresponding figures for urea and calcium ammonium nitrate treatments being 165 kg and 142 kg, respectively. Although urea and calcium ammonium nitrate reduced the clover content of the sward to a similar degree, urea appeared to have a less damaging effect on the symbiotic system. Results show that when N fertiliser is applied to mixed swards, the clover component utilises soil N along with atmospheric N2. However, accumulation of nitrate in the legume following application of N is considerably less than that observed in grass. The effects of grazing and the return of N in animal excreta on clover N2 fixation were studied in a system which allowed grazing of the sward but prevented animal ingress on the protected sward area. N fixation rates in the enclosed areas were 12% lower than values observed in plots to which animals had free access, although this difference was not statistically significant at the 5% level. Restricted plots were more selectively and intensively grazed and this had a more harmful effect on N2 fixation than the return of N via the grazing animal.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea reduced average white clover content to 15.4% compared with 21.3% in the zero-N control.

Taxon
White CloverTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
application of 50 kg N/ha in March as ureae0
Outcome
clover contente1
Direction
reducede4
Value
15.4e1
Comparator
zero N (control) treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on White Clover (Trifolium repens) Performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“The application of 50 kg N/ha in March as urea or calcium ammonium nitrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“Average clover content in the sward throughout the year was 15.4 and 15.1% for the urea and calcium ammonium nitrate treatments, respectively, compared with 21.3% for the zero N (control) treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–438 · show in text ↑
e4

“Although urea and calcium ammonium nitrate reduced the clover content of the sward to a similar degree, urea appeared to have a less damaging effect on the symbiotic system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–907 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium ammonium nitrate reduced average white clover content to 15.1% compared with 21.3% in the zero-N control.

Taxon
White CloverTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
calcium ammonium nitratee0
Outcome
clover contente1
Direction
reducede4
Value
15.1%e1
Comparator
zero N (control) treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on White Clover (Trifolium repens) Performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“The application of 50 kg N/ha in March as urea or calcium ammonium nitrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“Average clover content in the sward throughout the year was 15.4 and 15.1% for the urea and calcium ammonium nitrate treatments, respectively, compared with 21.3% for the zero N (control) treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–438 · show in text ↑
e4

“Although urea and calcium ammonium nitrate reduced the clover content of the sward to a similar degree, urea appeared to have a less damaging effect on the symbiotic system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–907 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea reduced total clover production to 1.52 t/ha compared with 2.00 t/ha in the control.

Taxon
White CloverTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
ureae2
Outcome
Total clover productione2
Direction
lowerinferrede2
Value
1.52 t/hae2
Comparator
the controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on White Clover (Trifolium repens) Performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–105 · show in text ↑
e2

“Total clover production was 1.52 t/ha for the urea and 1.51 for calcium ammonium nitrate treatments compared with 2.00 t/ha for the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–579 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium ammonium nitrate reduced total clover production to 1.51 compared with 2.00 t/ha in the control.

Taxon
White CloverTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
calcium ammonium nitrate treatmentse2
Outcome
Total clover productione2
Direction
lowerinferrede2
Value
1.51e2
Comparator
the controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on White Clover (Trifolium repens) Performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–105 · show in text ↑
e2

“Total clover production was 1.52 t/ha for the urea and 1.51 for calcium ammonium nitrate treatments compared with 2.00 t/ha for the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–579 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea-treated plots fixed 165 kg N/ha/an compared with 194 kg N/ha/an in control plots.

Taxon
White CloverTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
ureae3
Outcome
fixede3
Direction
lowerinferrede3
Value
165 kge3
Comparator
control plotse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on White Clover (Trifolium repens) Performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–105 · show in text ↑
e3

“The control plots fixed 194 kg N/ha/an, the corresponding figures for urea and calcium ammonium nitrate treatments being 165 kg and 142 kg, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–733 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium ammonium nitrate-treated plots fixed 142 kg N/ha/an compared with 194 kg N/ha/an in control plots.

Taxon
White CloverTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
calcium ammonium nitrate treatmentse3
Outcome
fixede3
Direction
lowerinferrede3
Value
142 kge3
Comparator
control plotse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on White Clover (Trifolium repens) Performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–105 · show in text ↑
e3

“The control plots fixed 194 kg N/ha/an, the corresponding figures for urea and calcium ammonium nitrate treatments being 165 kg and 142 kg, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–733 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea appeared to have a less damaging effect on the symbiotic system than calcium ammonium nitrate.

Taxon
White CloverTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
ureae4
Outcome
symbiotic systeme4
Direction
less damaginge4
Comparator
calcium ammonium nitratee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on White Clover (Trifolium repens) Performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–105 · show in text ↑
e4

“Although urea and calcium ammonium nitrate reduced the clover content of the sward to a similar degree, urea appeared to have a less damaging effect on the symbiotic system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–907 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate accumulation in the legume after N application is considerably less than in grass.

Taxon
legumee5
Treatment
application of Ne5
Outcome
accumulation of nitratee5
Direction
lesse5
Comparator
grasse5

Verbatim

e5

“accumulation of nitrate in the legume following application of N is considerably less than that observed in grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1159 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

When N fertiliser is applied to mixed swards, the clover component uses soil N along with atmospheric N2.

Taxon
clover componente6
Outcome
utilises soil Ne6
Setting
mixed swardse6

Verbatim

e6

“Results show that when N fertiliser is applied to mixed swards, the clover component utilises soil N along with atmospheric N2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1035 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N fixation rates in enclosed areas were 12% lower than in plots with free animal access, not significant at the 5% level.

Taxon
White CloverTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
enclosed arease7
Outcome
N fixation ratese7
Direction
lowere7
Value
12%e7
Comparator
plots to which animals had free accesse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on White Clover (Trifolium repens) Performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–105 · show in text ↑
e7

“N fixation rates in the enclosed areas were 12% lower than values observed in plots to which animals had free access, although this difference was not statistically significant at the 5% level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1554 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Restricted, more intensively grazed plots reduced N2 fixation more than the return of N via grazing animals.

Taxon
White CloverTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
more selectively and intensively grazede1
Outcome
N2 fixatione1
Direction
more harmfule1
Comparator
the return of N via the grazing animale1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on White Clover (Trifolium repens) Performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–105 · show in text ↑
e1

“Restricted plots were more selectively and intensively grazed and this had a more harmful effect on N2 fixation than the return of N via the grazing animal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1556–1711 · show in text ↑

calcium ammonium nitrate · yield · Trifolium repens (white clover)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Trifolium repens (white clover)Results differ

24 papers: 11 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Trifolium repens (white clover)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.