Paper · 2016

Lime and zinc application influence soil zinc availability, dry matter yield and zinc uptake by maize grown on Alfisols

Sanjib K. Behera; Arvind K. Shukla; Brahma S. Dwivedi; et al.

12
claims
20
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract. Zinc (Zn) deficiency is widespread in all types of soils of world including acid soils affecting crop production and nutritional quality of edible plant parts. There is, however, limited information available regarding effects of lime and farmyard manure (FYM) addition on soil properties, phyto-available Zn by different extractants, dry matter yield, Zn concentration and uptake by maize (Zea mays L.). Green house pot experiments were carried out in two acid soils to study the effect of five levels of lime (0, 1/10 lime requirement (LR), 1/3 LR, 2/3 LR and LR), three levels of Zn concentration (0, 2.5 and 5.0 mg Zn kg−1 soil) and two levels of FYM (0 and 10 t ha−1) addition on soil pH, EC and OC content, phyto-available Zn in soil and dry matter yield, Zn concentration and uptake by maize plant grown up to 60 days. Application of lime and FYM improved soil pH. Increased level of lime application reduced Zn extracted by DTPA, Mehlich 1, Mehlich 3, 0.1 N HCl and ABDTPA extractants. However, application of FYM along with lime improved Zn extraction. The amount of Zn extracted by different extractants followed the order DTPA-Zn < ABDTPA-Zn < Mehlich-1 Zn < 0.1 M HCl. Lime rate of 1/3rd LR was found to be optimum as dry matter yield of maize increased significantly with lime application up to 1/3rd LR in soils of both the series and decreased subsequently. Addition of FYM with and without lime increased dry matter yield. Application of Zn up to 5.0 mg kg−1 to soil increased dry matter yield with and without FYM application in soils of Hariharapur series. Addition of higher doses of lime significantly reduced Zn concentration in maize crop grown in soils of both the series. Mean Zn uptake values were at par for no lime, 1/10th LR and 1/3rd LR with and without FYM application and it was significantly higher than Zn uptake by 2/3rd LR and LR treatments. However, FYM application improved Zn uptake by maize crop. Zn extracted by different extractants like DTPA, ABDTPA, Mehlich 1, Mehlich 3 and 0.1 M HCl was positively and significantly correlated amongst themselves and with dry matter yield, Zn concentration and Zn uptake by maize.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime and manure improved soil pH.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
lime and FYMe0
Outcome
soil pHe0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of lime and FYM improved soil pH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–880 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing lime reduced extractable soil zinc across listed extractants.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
lime applicatione0
Outcome
Zn extracted by DTPA, Mehlich 1, Mehlich 3, 0.1 N HCl and ABDTPA extractantse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased level of lime application reduced Zn extracted by DTPA, Mehlich 1, Mehlich 3, 0.1 N HCl and ABDTPA extractants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1002 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure with lime improved zinc extraction.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
FYM along with limee0
Outcome
Zn extractione0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of FYM along with lime improved Zn extraction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1070 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extracted zinc followed the stated ranking among extractants.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
amount of Zn extractede0
Direction
DTPA-Zn < ABDTPA-Zn < Mehlich-1 Zn < 0.1 M HCle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The amount of Zn extracted by different extractants followed the order DTPA-Zn < ABDTPA-Zn < Mehlich-1 Zn < 0.1 M HCl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1189 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize dry matter yield increased significantly through one-third lime requirement, then decreased.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
lime application up to 1/3rd LRe0
Outcome
dry matter yield of maizee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in soils of both the seriese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry matter yield of maize increased significantly with lime application up to 1/3rd LR in soils of both the series and decreased subsequently”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1381 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure increased maize dry matter yield with and without lime.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
FYM with and without limee0
Outcome
dry matter yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of FYM with and without lime increased dry matter yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1447 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc addition increased dry matter yield in Hariharapur soil.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Zn up to 5.0 mg kg−1 to soile0
Outcome
dry matter yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
soils of Hariharapur seriese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of Zn up to 5.0 mg kg−1 to soil increased dry matter yield with and without FYM application in soils of Hariharapur series”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1449–1583 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher lime doses significantly reduced maize zinc concentration.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
higher doses of limee0
Outcome
Zn concentration in maize crope0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher doses of lime significantly reduced Zn concentration in maize crop grown in soils of both the series”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1597–1704 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Low lime treatments had greater zinc uptake than higher lime treatments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
no lime, 1/10th LR and 1/3rd LRe0
Outcome
Zn uptakee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
2/3rd LR and LR treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean Zn uptake values were at par for no lime, 1/10th LR and 1/3rd LR with and without FYM application and it was significantly higher than Zn uptake by 2/3rd LR and LR treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1706–1885 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure improved maize zinc uptake.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
FYM applicatione0
Outcome
Zn uptake by maize crope0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FYM application improved Zn uptake by maize crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1896–1944 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Extractant zinc values correlated positively with one another.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
Zn extracted by different extractantse0
Direction
positivelye0
Comparator
DTPA, ABDTPA, Mehlich 1, Mehlich 3 and 0.1 M HCle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zn extracted by different extractants like DTPA, ABDTPA, Mehlich 1, Mehlich 3 and 0.1 M HCl was positively and significantly correlated amongst themselves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1946–2100 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Extractant zinc was positively correlated with maize dry matter yield, zinc concentration and uptake.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
dry matter yield, Zn concentration and Zn uptake by maizee0
Direction
positivelye0
Comparator
Zn extracted by different extractantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zn extracted by different extractants like DTPA, ABDTPA, Mehlich 1, Mehlich 3 and 0.1 M HCl was positively and significantly correlated amongst themselves and with dry matter yield, Zn concentration and Zn uptake by maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1946–2167 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

441 papers: 391 positive, 50 negative or no effect

390 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

437 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

lime · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

42 papers: 36 positive, 6 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

lime · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

lime · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

95 papers: 71 positive, 24 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

lime · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

219 papers: 185 positive, 34 negative or no effect

184 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

215 papers more in this group

See all 219 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

339 papers: 303 positive, 36 negative or no effect

302 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

335 papers more in this group

See all 339 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,164 papers: 1,026 positive, 138 negative or no effect

1,025 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,160 papers more in this group

See all 1,164 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.