Abstract
Various postharvest procedures were conducted on several rose ( Rosa hybrida ) cultivars to determine the effects on vase life, water uptake, change in fresh weight, stage of opening, and vase life termination criteria. Vase life was influenced by cultivar and vase solution. Commercial preservative solutions resulted in a longer vase life, smaller decrease in fresh weight than the controls, and smaller increase in water uptake. Vase life of nine cultivars in distilled water ranged from a low of 7.1 days for Queen 2000 to a high of 15.3 days for Forever Young. Flower termination criteria were also cultivar specific with Black Baccara, Classy, and Charlotte most prone to bent neck and blackening of petal tips. Exogenous ethylene at 0.4 or 4.0 μL·L −1 did not affect vase life but lowered water uptake. Application of the antiethylene agent silver thiosulfate (STS) at 0.2 m m concentration significantly improved vase life in five out of the nine cultivars (Anna, Charlotte, First Red, Freedom, and Konfetti) tested, but 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) at 740 nL·L −1 did not improve vase life over the control. Both vase life and water uptake were reduced when more than one stem was placed in a vase; placing 10 stems in a vase shortened vase life by 1.4 days and impeded water uptake by up to 10.6 mL/stem per day. Increasing the amount of time stems remained dry before placing in a vase reduced vase life, but recutting immediately before placing in a vase minimized the decline. Increasing the amount of stem cut off the base up to 10 cm increased vase life.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 17
Claim · model-written summary
Vase life depended on cultivar and vase solution.
- Taxon
- rose ( Rosa hybrida )
Rosa hybrid cultivart0 - Material
- cultivare0
- Outcome
- Vase lifee0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Vase life was influenced by cultivar and vase solution.”
t0“rose ( Rosa hybrida )”
Claim · model-written summary
Commercial preservative solutions prolonged vase life.
- Taxon
- rose ( Rosa hybrida )
Rosa hybrid cultivart0 - Treatment
- Commercial preservative solutionse0
- Outcome
- vase lifee0
- Direction
- longere0
- Comparator
- the controlse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Commercial preservative solutions resulted in a longer vase life, smaller decrease in fresh weight than the controls, and smaller increase in water uptake.”
t0“rose ( Rosa hybrida )”
Claim · model-written summary
Commercial preservative solutions reduced the decrease in fresh weight relative to controls.
- Taxon
- rose ( Rosa hybrida )
Rosa hybrid cultivart0 - Treatment
- Commercial preservative solutionse0
- Outcome
- fresh weighte0
- Direction
- smaller decreasee0
- Comparator
- the controlse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Commercial preservative solutions resulted in a longer vase life, smaller decrease in fresh weight than the controls, and smaller increase in water uptake.”
t0“rose ( Rosa hybrida )”
Claim · model-written summary
Commercial preservative solutions gave a smaller increase in water uptake.
- Taxon
- rose ( Rosa hybrida )
Rosa hybrid cultivart0 - Treatment
- Commercial preservative solutionse0
- Outcome
- water uptakee0
- Direction
- smaller increasee0
- Comparator
- the controlse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Commercial preservative solutions resulted in a longer vase life, smaller decrease in fresh weight than the controls, and smaller increase in water uptake.”
t0“rose ( Rosa hybrida )”
Claim · model-written summary
Queen 2000 had the shortest vase life in distilled water, 7.1 days.
- Taxon
- rose ( Rosa hybrida )
Rosa hybrid cultivart0 - Material
- Queen 2000e0
- Treatment
- distilled watere0
- Outcome
- Vase lifee0
- Direction
- lowe0
- Value
- 7.1 dayse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Vase life of nine cultivars in distilled water ranged from a low of 7.1 days for Queen 2000 to a high of 15.3 days for Forever Young.”
t0“rose ( Rosa hybrida )”
Claim · model-written summary
Forever Young had the longest vase life in distilled water, 15.3 days.
- Taxon
- rose ( Rosa hybrida )
Rosa hybrid cultivart0 - Material
- Forever Younge0
- Treatment
- distilled watere0
- Outcome
- Vase lifee0
- Direction
- highe0
- Value
- 15.3 dayse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Vase life of nine cultivars in distilled water ranged from a low of 7.1 days for Queen 2000 to a high of 15.3 days for Forever Young.”
t0“rose ( Rosa hybrida )”
Claim · model-written summary
Black Baccara, Classy, and Charlotte were most prone to bent neck and petal-tip blackening.
- Taxon
- rose ( Rosa hybrida )
Rosa hybrid cultivart0 - Outcome
- bent neck and blackening of petal tipse0
- Direction
- most pronee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Flower termination criteria were also cultivar specific with Black Baccara, Classy, and Charlotte most prone to bent neck and blackening of petal tips.”
t0“rose ( Rosa hybrida )”
Claim · model-written summary
Exogenous ethylene did not affect vase life.
- Taxon
- rose ( Rosa hybrida )
Rosa hybrid cultivart0 - Treatment
- Exogenous ethylene at 0.4 or 4.0 μL·L −1e0
- Outcome
- vase lifee0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Exogenous ethylene at 0.4 or 4.0 μL·L −1 did not affect vase life but lowered water uptake.”
t0“rose ( Rosa hybrida )”
Claim · model-written summary
Exogenous ethylene lowered water uptake.
- Taxon
- rose ( Rosa hybrida )
Rosa hybrid cultivart0 - Treatment
- Exogenous ethylene at 0.4 or 4.0 μL·L −1e0
- Outcome
- water uptakee0
- Direction
- lowerede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Exogenous ethylene at 0.4 or 4.0 μL·L −1 did not affect vase life but lowered water uptake.”
t0“rose ( Rosa hybrida )”
Claim · model-written summary
Silver thiosulfate significantly improved vase life in five cultivars.
- Taxon
- rose ( Rosa hybrida )
Rosa hybrid cultivart0 - Treatment
- silver thiosulfate (STS) at 0.2 m m concentratione0
- Outcome
- vase lifee0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- five out of the nine cultivarse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Application of the antiethylene agent silver thiosulfate (STS) at 0.2 m m concentration significantly improved vase life in five out of the nine cultivars (Anna, Charlotte, First Red, Freedom, and Konfetti) tested”
t0“rose ( Rosa hybrida )”
Claim · model-written summary
1-MCP did not improve vase life over the control.
- Taxon
- rose ( Rosa hybrida )
Rosa hybrid cultivart0 - Treatment
- 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) at 740 nL·L −1e0
- Outcome
- vase lifee0
- Direction
- did not improvee0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) at 740 nL·L −1 did not improve vase life over the control.”
t0“rose ( Rosa hybrida )”
Claim · model-written summary
More than one stem per vase reduced vase life and water uptake.
- Taxon
- rose ( Rosa hybrida )
Rosa hybrid cultivart0 - Treatment
- more than one stem was placed in a vasee0
- Outcome
- vase life and water uptakee0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Both vase life and water uptake were reduced when more than one stem was placed in a vase”
t0“rose ( Rosa hybrida )”
Claim · model-written summary
Ten stems per vase shortened vase life by 1.4 days.
- Taxon
- rose ( Rosa hybrida )
Rosa hybrid cultivart0 - Treatment
- placing 10 stems in a vasee0
- Outcome
- vase lifee0
- Direction
- shortenede0
- Value
- 1.4 dayse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“placing 10 stems in a vase shortened vase life by 1.4 days”
t0“rose ( Rosa hybrida )”
Claim · model-written summary
Ten stems per vase impeded water uptake by up to 10.6 mL per stem per day.
- Taxon
- rose ( Rosa hybrida )
Rosa hybrid cultivart0 - Treatment
- placing 10 stems in a vasee0
- Outcome
- water uptakee0
- Direction
- impedede0
- Value
- 10.6 mL/stem per daye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“placing 10 stems in a vase shortened vase life by 1.4 days and impeded water uptake by up to 10.6 mL/stem per day.”
t0“rose ( Rosa hybrida )”
Claim · model-written summary
Longer dry storage before placing stems in a vase reduced vase life.
- Taxon
- rose ( Rosa hybrida )
Rosa hybrid cultivart0 - Treatment
- Increasing the amount of time stems remained drye0
- Outcome
- vase lifee0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Increasing the amount of time stems remained dry before placing in a vase reduced vase life”
t0“rose ( Rosa hybrida )”
Claim · model-written summary
Recutting stems immediately before placing them in a vase minimized the decline in vase life.
- Taxon
- rose ( Rosa hybrida )
Rosa hybrid cultivart0 - Treatment
- recutting immediately before placing in a vasee0
- Outcome
- the declinee0
- Direction
- minimizede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“recutting immediately before placing in a vase minimized the decline”
t0“rose ( Rosa hybrida )”
Claim · model-written summary
Cutting up to 10 cm from the stem base increased vase life.
- Taxon
- rose ( Rosa hybrida )
Rosa hybrid cultivart0 - Treatment
- Increasing the amount of stem cut off the base up to 10 cme0
- Outcome
- vase lifee0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Increasing the amount of stem cut off the base up to 10 cm increased vase life.”
t0“rose ( Rosa hybrida )”
The same questions in other papers
ethene · quality: postharvest · Rosa hybrid cultivarResults differ
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- negative
1-methylcyclopropene · quality: postharvest · Rosa hybrid cultivarPositive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
thiosulfate · quality: postharvest · Rosa hybrid cultivarResults agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
silver atom · quality: postharvest · Rosa hybrid cultivarResults agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.