Abstract
In order to improve the post production quality of cut flowers of Rosa hybrida L. cv. Baroness, the effect of 8-hydroxyquinoline sulfate (8-HQS), silver thiosulfate (STS) and 1-methylcyclopropene ( I-MCP) were investigated. 8-HQS was used at 200 and 400 ppm with or without sucrose at 50 g LI. STS was used at 0.2, and 0.4 mM with or without sucrose at 50 g 1-I. l-MCP was used at 0.3, 0.5 and 0.7 g in-3 for 6h. The postproduction quality was improved as a result of using any chemical treatment comparing with untreated control. All the treatments of 8-HQS increased the vase life and minimized the percentage of weight loss of rose cut flowers compared to the control. The vase life was lorger when 8-HQS was combined with sucrose. The best treatment of 8-HQS was 400 ppm 8-HQS + 50 g 1-1 sucrose. STS treatment led to prolong the vase life and minimized the percentage of weight loss compared to the control. In addition, the effect was better when sucrose was added to STS. The treatment of STS at 0.4 mM + 50 g 1-1 sucrose was the best one. l -MCP treatment prolonged the vase life and lowered the percentage of weight loss at any level compared with untreated control. The best treatment in this concern was l -MCP at 0.5 g m-3 for 6h. The chlorophyll content (chl.a and chid)) of the leaves for the best treatment of each chemical was higher than the control. The treatment of STS at 0.4 mM + 50 g 1-1 sucrose gave the best results in this respect.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
8-HQS increased rose vase life versus control.
- Taxon
- Rosa hybrida L.
Rosa hybrid cultivare1 - Material
- Baronesse1
- Treatment
- 8-HQSe0
- Outcome
- vase lifee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“All the treatments of 8-HQS increased the vase life and minimized the percentage of weight loss of rose cut flowers compared to the control”
e1“Rosa hybrida L. cv. Baroness”
Claim · model-written summary
8-HQS minimized rose cut-flower weight loss versus control.
- Taxon
- Rosa hybrida L.Rosa hybrid cultivare1
- Treatment
- 8-HQSe0
- Outcome
- percentage of weight losse0
- Direction
- minimizede0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“All the treatments of 8-HQS increased the vase life and minimized the percentage of weight loss of rose cut flowers compared to the control”
e1“Rosa hybrida L. cv. Baroness”
Claim · model-written summary
Adding sucrose to 8-HQS lengthened vase life.
- Taxon
- Rosa hybrida L.Rosa hybrid cultivare1
- Treatment
- 8-HQS was combined with sucrosee0
- Outcome
- vase lifee0
- Direction
- lorgere0
- Comparator
- 8-HQSe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The vase life was lorger when 8-HQS was combined with sucrose”
e1“Rosa hybrida L. cv. Baroness”
Claim · model-written summary
The best 8-HQS treatment was 400 ppm 8-HQS plus 50 g 1-1 sucrose.
- Taxon
- Rosa hybrida L.Rosa hybrid cultivare1
- Treatment
- 400 ppm 8-HQS + 50 g 1-1 sucrosee0
- Outcome
- best treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The best treatment of 8-HQS was 400 ppm 8-HQS + 50 g 1-1 sucrose”
e1“Rosa hybrida L. cv. Baroness”
Claim · model-written summary
STS prolonged vase life versus control.
- Taxon
- Rosa hybrida L.Rosa hybrid cultivare1
- Treatment
- STS treatmente0
- Outcome
- vase lifee0
- Direction
- prolonge0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“STS treatment led to prolong the vase life and minimized the percentage of weight loss compared to the control”
e1“Rosa hybrida L. cv. Baroness”
Claim · model-written summary
STS minimized weight loss versus control.
- Taxon
- Rosa hybrida L.Rosa hybrid cultivare1
- Treatment
- STS treatmente0
- Outcome
- percentage of weight losse0
- Direction
- minimizede0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“STS treatment led to prolong the vase life and minimized the percentage of weight loss compared to the control”
e1“Rosa hybrida L. cv. Baroness”
Claim · model-written summary
Adding sucrose improved the STS effect.
- Taxon
- Rosa hybrida L.Rosa hybrid cultivare1
- Treatment
- sucrose was added to STSe0
- Outcome
- effecte0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- STSe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the effect was better when sucrose was added to STS”
e1“Rosa hybrida L. cv. Baroness”
Claim · model-written summary
STS at 0.4 mM plus sucrose was the best STS treatment.
- Taxon
- Rosa hybrida L.Rosa hybrid cultivare1
- Treatment
- STS at 0.4 mM + 50 g 1-1 sucrosee0
- Outcome
- best onee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The treatment of STS at 0.4 mM + 50 g 1-1 sucrose was the best one”
e1“Rosa hybrida L. cv. Baroness”
Claim · model-written summary
l-MCP prolonged vase life versus untreated control at every tested level.
- Taxon
- Rosa hybrida L.Rosa hybrid cultivare1
- Treatment
- l -MCP treatmente0
- Outcome
- vase lifee0
- Direction
- prolongede0
- Qualifier
- at any levele0
- Comparator
- untreated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“l -MCP treatment prolonged the vase life and lowered the percentage of weight loss at any level compared with untreated control”
e1“Rosa hybrida L. cv. Baroness”
Claim · model-written summary
l-MCP lowered weight loss versus untreated control at every tested level.
- Taxon
- Rosa hybrida L.Rosa hybrid cultivare1
- Treatment
- l -MCP treatmente0
- Outcome
- percentage of weight losse0
- Direction
- lowerede0
- Qualifier
- at any levele0
- Comparator
- untreated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“l -MCP treatment prolonged the vase life and lowered the percentage of weight loss at any level compared with untreated control”
e1“Rosa hybrida L. cv. Baroness”
Claim · model-written summary
The best l-MCP treatment was 0.5 g m-3 for 6h.
- Taxon
- Rosa hybrida L.Rosa hybrid cultivare1
- Treatment
- l -MCP at 0.5 g m-3 for 6he0
- Outcome
- best treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The best treatment in this concern was l -MCP at 0.5 g m-3 for 6h”
e1“Rosa hybrida L. cv. Baroness”
Claim · model-written summary
The best treatment for each chemical raised leaf chlorophyll content versus control.
- Taxon
- Rosa hybrida L.Rosa hybrid cultivare1
- Organ / stage
- leavese0
- Treatment
- best treatment of each chemicale0
- Outcome
- chlorophyll content (chl.a and chid))e0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The chlorophyll content (chl.a and chid)) of the leaves for the best treatment of each chemical was higher than the control”
e1“Rosa hybrida L. cv. Baroness”
Claim · model-written summary
STS at 0.4 mM plus sucrose gave the best leaf chlorophyll result.
- Taxon
- Rosa hybrida L.Rosa hybrid cultivare2
- Treatment
- STS at 0.4 mM + 50 g 1-1 sucrosee0
- Outcome
- chlorophyll contente1
- Direction
- beste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The treatment of STS at 0.4 mM + 50 g 1-1 sucrose gave the best results in this respect”
e1“The chlorophyll content (chl.a and chid)) of the leaves”
e2“Rosa hybrida L. cv. Baroness”
The same questions in other papers
sucrose · quality: postharvest · Rosa hybrid cultivarResults differ
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →thiosulfate · quality: postharvest · Rosa hybrid cultivarResults agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
silver atom · quality: postharvest · Rosa hybrid cultivarResults agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.