Paper · 1991 · HortScience

Silver Thiosulfate Application Influences Rooting and Budbreak of `Royalty' Rose Cuttings

Wen-Quan Sun; Nina L. Bassuk

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The effects of silver thiosulfate (STS) on stored and freshly made cuttings of `Royalty' rose (Rosa hybrids) were examined in relation to rooting and subsequent budbreak. STS pretreatment at 0.5 m m during storage stimulated budbreak but decreased the percentage of cuttings that rooted and the number of roots. IBA at 4.9 to 9.8 m m inhibited budbreak but this effect was partially reversed by STS. Spraying the cuttings with 1.0 m m STS once daily during the first 5 days of the rooting period also reduced rooting but prevented IBA-induced leaf senescence. Ethephon and spermine, each applied at 0.5 m m before rooting, had no effect on rooting or budbreak. Chemical names used: (2-chloroethyl)-phosphonic acid (ethephon); indole butyric acid (IBA); N,N'-bis(3-aminopropyl) -l,4-buanediamine (spermine).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

STS pretreatment at 0.5 mM during storage stimulated budbreak of rose cuttings.

Taxon
Rosa hybridse0
Material
Royaltye0
Treatment
STS pretreatment at 0.5 m m during storagee1
Outcome
budbreake1
Direction
stimulatede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“`Royalty' rose (Rosa hybrids)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 79–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“STS pretreatment at 0.5 m m during storage stimulated budbreak but decreased the percentage of cuttings that rooted and the number of roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–310 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

STS pretreatment at 0.5 mM during storage decreased the percentage of rooted cuttings and the number of roots.

Taxon
Rosa hybridse0
Material
Royaltye0
Treatment
STS pretreatment at 0.5 m m during storagee1
Outcome
percentage of cuttings that rooted and the number of rootse1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“`Royalty' rose (Rosa hybrids)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 79–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“STS pretreatment at 0.5 m m during storage stimulated budbreak but decreased the percentage of cuttings that rooted and the number of roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–310 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IBA at 4.9 to 9.8 mM inhibited budbreak of rose cuttings.

Taxon
Rosa hybridse0
Material
Royaltye0
Treatment
IBA at 4.9 to 9.8 m me2
Outcome
budbreake2
Direction
inhibitede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“`Royalty' rose (Rosa hybrids)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 79–108 · show in text ↑
e2

“IBA at 4.9 to 9.8 m m inhibited budbreak but this effect was partially reversed by STS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–398 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

STS partially reversed the IBA-induced inhibition of budbreak.

Taxon
Rosa hybridse0
Material
Royaltye0
Treatment
STSe2
Outcome
budbreake2
Direction
partially reversede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“`Royalty' rose (Rosa hybrids)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 79–108 · show in text ↑
e2

“IBA at 4.9 to 9.8 m m inhibited budbreak but this effect was partially reversed by STS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–398 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying 1.0 mM STS daily during the first 5 days of rooting reduced rooting.

Taxon
Rosa hybridse0
Material
Royaltye0
Treatment
Spraying the cuttings with 1.0 m m STS once daily during the first 5 days of the rooting periode3
Outcome
rootinge3
Direction
reducede3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“`Royalty' rose (Rosa hybrids)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 79–108 · show in text ↑
e3

“Spraying the cuttings with 1.0 m m STS once daily during the first 5 days of the rooting period also reduced rooting but prevented IBA-induced leaf senescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–558 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying 1.0 mM STS daily during the first 5 days of rooting prevented IBA-induced leaf senescence.

Taxon
Rosa hybridse0
Material
Royaltye0
Treatment
Spraying the cuttings with 1.0 m m STS once daily during the first 5 days of the rooting periode3
Outcome
IBA-induced leaf senescencee3
Direction
preventede3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“`Royalty' rose (Rosa hybrids)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 79–108 · show in text ↑
e3

“Spraying the cuttings with 1.0 m m STS once daily during the first 5 days of the rooting period also reduced rooting but prevented IBA-induced leaf senescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–558 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon applied at 0.5 mM before rooting had no effect on rooting or budbreak.

Taxon
Rosa hybridse0
Material
Royaltye0
Treatment
Ethephone4
Outcome
rooting or budbreake4
Direction
no effecte4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“`Royalty' rose (Rosa hybrids)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 79–108 · show in text ↑
e4

“Ethephon and spermine, each applied at 0.5 m m before rooting, had no effect on rooting or budbreak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–659 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spermine applied at 0.5 mM before rooting had no effect on rooting or budbreak.

Taxon
Rosa hybridse0
Material
Royaltye0
Treatment
sperminee4
Outcome
rooting or budbreake4
Direction
no effecte4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“`Royalty' rose (Rosa hybrids)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 79–108 · show in text ↑
e4

“Ethephon and spermine, each applied at 0.5 m m before rooting, had no effect on rooting or budbreak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–659 · show in text ↑

spermine · growth · Rosa hybrid cultivarPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

silver atom · growth · Rosa hybrid cultivarPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

thiosulfate · quality: postharvest · Rosa hybrid cultivarResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

silver atom · quality: postharvest · Rosa hybrid cultivarResults agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

storage · growth · Rosa hybrid cultivarPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · quality: postharvest · Rosa hybrid cultivarPositive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · growth · Rosa hybrid cultivarPositive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.