Paper · 1996 · HortScience

Modified-atmosphere Packaging of Grapes and Strawberries Fumigated with Acetic Acid

A.L. Moyls; P.L. Sholberg; A.P. Gaunce

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
63
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A fumigation technique using brief exposure of fruit to a low concentration of acetic acid vapor was combined with modified-atmosphere packaging to reduce storage rots and increase shelf life of grapes ( Vitis vinifera L.) and strawberries ( Fragaria ×ananassa Duch.) by two or three times normal values. Both commodities were inoculated with spores of Botrytis cinerea Pers. before fumigation with acetic acid, packaging, and storage at lowered O 2 levels. Fumigation with acetic acid at 8.0 mg·L –1 followed by modified-atmosphere packaging for 74 days at 0 °C reduced the percentage of rotted grapes from 94% to 2%. Strawberries fumigated with acetic acid at 5.4 mg·L –1 were free of decay compared to 89% rotted for the control fruit stored for 14 days at 5 °C.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetic acid fumigation followed by modified-atmosphere packaging reduced the percentage of rotted grapes from 94% to 2%.

Taxon
grapese1
Treatment
Fumigation with acetic acid at 8.0 mg·L –1 followed by modified-atmosphere packaging for 74 days at 0 °Ce1
Interactor
Botrytis cinerea Pers.Botrytis cinereae2pathogen
Outcome
percentage of rotted grapese1
Direction
reducede1
Value
94% to 2%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Fumigation with acetic acid at 8.0 mg·L –1 followed by modified-atmosphere packaging for 74 days at 0 °C reduced the percentage of rotted grapes from 94% to 2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–617 · show in text ↑
e2

“Both commodities were inoculated with spores of Botrytis cinerea Pers. before fumigation with acetic acid, packaging, and storage at lowered O 2 levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–456 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetic acid fumigation with modified-atmosphere packaging increased grape shelf life by two or three times normal values.

Taxon
grapese1
Treatment
modified-atmosphere packaginge2
Outcome
shelf lifee1
Direction
increasee1
Value
two or three times normal valuese1
Comparator
normal valuese1

Verbatim

e1

“increase shelf life of grapes ( Vitis vinifera L.) and strawberries ( Fragaria ×ananassa Duch.) by two or three times normal values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 172–303 · show in text ↑
e2

“was combined with modified-atmosphere packaging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetic acid fumigation with modified-atmosphere packaging increased strawberry shelf life by two or three times normal values.

Taxon
strawberriesFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
modified-atmosphere packaginge2
Outcome
shelf lifee1
Direction
increasee1
Value
two or three times normal valuese1
Comparator
normal valuese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“increase shelf life of grapes ( Vitis vinifera L.) and strawberries ( Fragaria ×ananassa Duch.) by two or three times normal values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 172–303 · show in text ↑
e2

“was combined with modified-atmosphere packaging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strawberries fumigated with acetic acid were free of decay, compared with 89% rotted control fruit after storage.

Taxon
StrawberriesFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
fumigated with acetic acid at 5.4 mg·L –1e1
Outcome
decaye1
Direction
decreaseinferrede1
Qualifier
compared to 89% rotted for the control fruit stored for 14 days at 5 °Ce1
Comparator
control fruite1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Strawberries fumigated with acetic acid at 5.4 mg·L –1 were free of decay compared to 89% rotted for the control fruit stored for 14 days at 5 °C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–764 · show in text ↑

storage · quality: postharvest · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

121 papers: 117 positive, 4 negative or no effect

116 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

117 papers more in this group

See all 121 papers →

storage · Botrytis cinerea · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

solarization · Botrytis cinerea · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

solarization · disease · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · VitisResults agree

22 papers: 22 positive, 0 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.