Abstract
Participatory trials on balance nutrients were conducted during 2009–12 in a severely micronutrient deficit semiarid central Indian watershed to promote balance use of nutrients. Application of micronutrient increased groundnut pods plant−1 by 9%, seeds pod−1 by 6% and pod yield by 13% (1132 kg ha−1) compared to control in entry point trials. Similarly, chickpea variety "JG-130" grown with balance fertilizers also recorded 15 and 40% higher grain yield compared to "JG-130" and local chickpea variety, respectively grown with traditional practice. Application of B, Zn and S increased mean groundnut pod yield by 16.8% over control in further up scaling trials. The study on residual effect of balance fertilization indicated that grain yield of succeeding wheat, barley, chickpea and mustard increased by 8.3, 10, 8.8 and 9.2%, respectively. Further, the sustainability index of direct balance fertilization to groundnut was 0.8 and it was 0.76, 0.74, 0.76 and 0.83 in residual effect in succeeding wheat, barley, gram and mustard, respectively. Although nearly 88% farmers were convinced by the impact of micronutrients, but only 9% farmers actually used them in kharif, 2012 and availability of micronutrients emerged as the maj or hurdle in up scaling.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 18
Claim · model-written summary
Micronutrient application increased groundnut pods plant−1 by 9% versus control.
- Taxon
- groundnut
Arachis hypogaeae0 - Treatment
- Application of micronutriente0
- Outcome
- groundnut pods plant−1e0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 9%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of micronutrient increased groundnut pods plant−1 by 9%, seeds pod−1 by 6% and pod yield by 13% (1132 kg ha−1) compared to control in entry point trials.”
Claim · model-written summary
Micronutrient application increased seeds pod−1 by 6% versus control.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- Application of micronutriente0
- Outcome
- seeds pod−1e0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 6%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of micronutrient increased groundnut pods plant−1 by 9%, seeds pod−1 by 6% and pod yield by 13% (1132 kg ha−1) compared to control in entry point trials.”
Claim · model-written summary
Micronutrient application increased pod yield by 13% (1132 kg ha−1) versus control.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- Application of micronutriente0
- Outcome
- pod yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 13% (1132 kg ha−1)e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of micronutrient increased groundnut pods plant−1 by 9%, seeds pod−1 by 6% and pod yield by 13% (1132 kg ha−1) compared to control in entry point trials.”
Claim · model-written summary
JG-130 with balanced fertilizer had 15% higher grain yield than JG-130 under traditional practice.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Material
- JG-130e0
- Treatment
- balance fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 15e0
- Comparator
- "JG-130"e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Similarly, chickpea variety "JG-130" grown with balance fertilizers also recorded 15 and 40% higher grain yield compared to "JG-130" and local chickpea variety, respectively grown with traditional practice.”
Claim · model-written summary
JG-130 with balanced fertilizer had 40% higher grain yield than the local chickpea variety under traditional practice.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Material
- JG-130e0
- Treatment
- balance fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 40%e0
- Comparator
- local chickpea varietye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Similarly, chickpea variety "JG-130" grown with balance fertilizers also recorded 15 and 40% higher grain yield compared to "JG-130" and local chickpea variety, respectively grown with traditional practice.”
Claim · model-written summary
B, Zn and S increased mean groundnut pod yield by 16.8% over control.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- Application of B, Zn and Se0
- Outcome
- mean groundnut pod yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 16.8%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of B, Zn and S increased mean groundnut pod yield by 16.8% over control in further up scaling trials.”
Claim · model-written summary
Residual balanced fertilization increased succeeding wheat grain yield by 8.3.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- residual effect of balance fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 8.3e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The study on residual effect of balance fertilization indicated that grain yield of succeeding wheat, barley, chickpea and mustard increased by 8.3, 10, 8.8 and 9.2%, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Residual balanced fertilization increased succeeding barley grain yield by 10.
- Taxon
- barley
.jpg?width=60)
Hordeum vulgaree0 - Treatment
- residual effect of balance fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 10e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The study on residual effect of balance fertilization indicated that grain yield of succeeding wheat, barley, chickpea and mustard increased by 8.3, 10, 8.8 and 9.2%, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Residual balanced fertilization increased succeeding chickpea grain yield by 8.8.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- residual effect of balance fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 8.8e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The study on residual effect of balance fertilization indicated that grain yield of succeeding wheat, barley, chickpea and mustard increased by 8.3, 10, 8.8 and 9.2%, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Residual balanced fertilization increased succeeding mustard grain yield by 9.2%.
- Taxon
- mustarde0
- Treatment
- residual effect of balance fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 9.2%e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The study on residual effect of balance fertilization indicated that grain yield of succeeding wheat, barley, chickpea and mustard increased by 8.3, 10, 8.8 and 9.2%, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
The balanced fertilization sustainability index for groundnut was 0.8.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- direct balance fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- sustainability indexe0
- Value
- 0.8e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Further, the sustainability index of direct balance fertilization to groundnut was 0.8 and it was 0.76, 0.74, 0.76 and 0.83 in residual effect in succeeding wheat, barley, gram and mustard, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
The balanced fertilization sustainability index for wheat was 0.76.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- residual effecte0
- Outcome
- sustainability indexe0
- Value
- 0.76e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Further, the sustainability index of direct balance fertilization to groundnut was 0.8 and it was 0.76, 0.74, 0.76 and 0.83 in residual effect in succeeding wheat, barley, gram and mustard, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
The balanced fertilization sustainability index for barley was 0.74.
- Taxon
- barleyHordeum vulgaree0
- Treatment
- residual effecte0
- Outcome
- sustainability indexe0
- Value
- 0.74e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Further, the sustainability index of direct balance fertilization to groundnut was 0.8 and it was 0.76, 0.74, 0.76 and 0.83 in residual effect in succeeding wheat, barley, gram and mustard, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
The balanced fertilization sustainability index for gram was 0.76.
Verbatim
e0“Further, the sustainability index of direct balance fertilization to groundnut was 0.8 and it was 0.76, 0.74, 0.76 and 0.83 in residual effect in succeeding wheat, barley, gram and mustard, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
The balanced fertilization sustainability index for mustard was 0.83.
Verbatim
e0“Further, the sustainability index of direct balance fertilization to groundnut was 0.8 and it was 0.76, 0.74, 0.76 and 0.83 in residual effect in succeeding wheat, barley, gram and mustard, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Nearly 88% of farmers were convinced by micronutrient impact.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“Although nearly 88% farmers were convinced by the impact of micronutrients, but only 9% farmers actually used them in kharif, 2012 and availability of micronutrients emerged as the maj or hurdle in up scaling.”
Claim · model-written summary
Only 9% of farmers used micronutrients in kharif 2012.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“Although nearly 88% farmers were convinced by the impact of micronutrients, but only 9% farmers actually used them in kharif, 2012 and availability of micronutrients emerged as the maj or hurdle in up scaling.”
Claim · model-written summary
Micronutrient availability was the main obstacle to scaling up.
- Outcome
- availability of micronutrients emerged as the maj or hurdle in up scalinge0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“Although nearly 88% farmers were convinced by the impact of micronutrients, but only 9% farmers actually used them in kharif, 2012 and availability of micronutrients emerged as the maj or hurdle in up scaling.”
The same questions in other papers
zinc atom · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
64 papers more in this group
See all 68 papers →micronutrient · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
325 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
341 papers more in this group
See all 345 papers →fertilization · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
472 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
546 papers more in this group
See all 550 papers →fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
3,434 papers more in this group
See all 3,438 papers →micronutrient · organism · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.