Paper · 1997 · Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B - Soil & Plant Science

Effects of carbon dioxide concentrations on three grass species grown in mixture in two soil types at different ozone concentrations or temperatures

Leiv M. Mortensen

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A seed mixture of Phleum pratense L., Lolium perenne L. and Festuca pratensis Huds. was grown in spaghnum peat or sandy soil in six growth chambers placed in a greenhouse compartment. Two different experiments were performed. Increasing the CO2 concentration from 375 to 740 μmol mol−1 increased the total dry weight of the grass mixture by about 30%, while an increase in the O3 concentration from < 10 to 50 nmol mol−1 decreased the dry weight by 18% as a mean in both experiments. The relative dry weights of the three species were not significantly affected by elevated CO2 concentrations at low O3, while Lolium increased its relative dry weight at high O3concentrations at low CO2 on the expenditure of Phleum dry weight. CO2 enrichment counteracted some of this O3 effect. No significant interaction between CO2 concentration and temperature (14 and 19°C mean temperature) was found with respect to the dry weights of the three species. The soil type had generally no influence on the effect of CO2 and O3. However, plant growth was significantly slower in sandy soil than in peat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased grass mixture total dry weight by about 30%.

Taxon
Phleum pratense L., Lolium perenne L. and Festuca pratensis Huds.Lolium perenneFestuca pratensisPhleum pratensee0
Treatment
CO2 concentration from 375 to 740 μmol mol−1e1
Outcome
total dry weight of the grass mixturee1
Direction
increasede1
Value
about 30%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Festuca pratensis
Festuca pratensis · TaxonT.Voekler · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phleum pratense
Phleum pratense · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phleum pratense L., Lolium perenne L. and Festuca pratensis Huds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing the CO2 concentration from 375 to 740 μmol mol−1 increased the total dry weight of the grass mixture by about 30%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–350 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher ozone decreased grass mixture dry weight by 18%.

Taxon
Phleum pratense L., Lolium perenne L. and Festuca pratensis Huds.Lolium perenneFestuca pratensisPhleum pratensee0
Treatment
O3 concentration from < 10 to 50 nmol mol−1e1
Outcome
dry weighte1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
18%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Festuca pratensis
Festuca pratensis · TaxonT.Voekler · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phleum pratense
Phleum pratense · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phleum pratense L., Lolium perenne L. and Festuca pratensis Huds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“an increase in the O3 concentration from < 10 to 50 nmol mol−1 decreased the dry weight by 18% as a mean in both experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–482 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 at low ozone did not significantly affect the three species relative dry weights.

Taxon
Phleum pratense L., Lolium perenne L. and Festuca pratensis Huds.Lolium perenneFestuca pratensisPhleum pratensee0
Treatment
elevated CO2 concentrationse1
Outcome
relative dry weights of the three speciese1
Direction
not significantly affectede1
Qualifier
at low O3e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Festuca pratensis
Festuca pratensis · TaxonT.Voekler · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phleum pratense
Phleum pratense · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phleum pratense L., Lolium perenne L. and Festuca pratensis Huds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“The relative dry weights of the three species were not significantly affected by elevated CO2 concentrations at low O3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–602 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lolium relative dry weight increased at high ozone and low CO2.

Taxon
LoliumLoliume1
Treatment
high O3concentrations at low CO2e1
Outcome
relative dry weighte1
Direction
increasede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lolium perenne L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“Lolium increased its relative dry weight at high O3concentrations at low CO2 on the expenditure of Phleum dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–726 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phleum relative dry weight decreased under high ozone and low CO2.

Taxon
PhleumPhleume1
Treatment
high O3concentrations at low CO2e1
Outcome
Phleum dry weighte1
Direction
decreaseinferrede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phleum
Phleum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Rasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phleum pratense L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–36 · show in text ↑
e1

“Lolium increased its relative dry weight at high O3concentrations at low CO2 on the expenditure of Phleum dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–726 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 enrichment counteracted some of the ozone-related relative biomass effect.

Taxon
Phleum pratense L., Lolium perenne L. and Festuca pratensis Huds.Lolium perenneFestuca pratensisPhleum pratensee0
Treatment
CO2 enrichmente1
Outcome
O3 effecte1
Direction
counteractede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Festuca pratensis
Festuca pratensis · TaxonT.Voekler · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phleum pratense
Phleum pratense · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phleum pratense L., Lolium perenne L. and Festuca pratensis Huds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“CO2 enrichment counteracted some of this O3 effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–778 · show in text ↑
e2

“Lolium increased its relative dry weight at high O3concentrations at low CO2 on the expenditure of Phleum dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–726 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No significant CO2-by-temperature interaction was found for species dry weights.

Taxon
Phleum pratense L., Lolium perenne L. and Festuca pratensis Huds.Lolium perenneFestuca pratensisPhleum pratensee0
Treatment
CO2 concentration and temperature (14 and 19°C mean temperature)e1
Outcome
dry weights of the three speciese1
Direction
No significant interactione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Festuca pratensis
Festuca pratensis · TaxonT.Voekler · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phleum pratense
Phleum pratense · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phleum pratense L., Lolium perenne L. and Festuca pratensis Huds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“No significant interaction between CO2 concentration and temperature (14 and 19°C mean temperature) was found with respect to the dry weights of the three species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–942 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil type generally did not influence CO2 and ozone effects.

Taxon
Phleum pratense L., Lolium perenne L. and Festuca pratensis Huds.Lolium perenneFestuca pratensisPhleum pratensee0
Outcome
effect of CO2 and O3e1
Direction
no influencee1
Setting
soil typee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Festuca pratensis
Festuca pratensis · TaxonT.Voekler · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phleum pratense
Phleum pratense · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phleum pratense L., Lolium perenne L. and Festuca pratensis Huds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“The soil type had generally no influence on the effect of CO2 and O3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1012 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grass growth was significantly slower in sandy soil than peat.

Taxon
Phleum pratense L., Lolium perenne L. and Festuca pratensis Huds.Lolium perenneFestuca pratensisPhleum pratensee0
Treatment
sandy soile1
Outcome
plant growthe1
Direction
slowere1
Comparator
peate1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Festuca pratensis
Festuca pratensis · TaxonT.Voekler · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phleum pratense
Phleum pratense · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phleum pratense L., Lolium perenne L. and Festuca pratensis Huds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant growth was significantly slower in sandy soil than in peat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1087 · show in text ↑

co2 · growth · Phleum pratense (timothy)Results differ

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

co2 · growth · Lolium perenne (perennial ryegrass)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 9 positive, 5 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

co2 · growth · Festuca pratensis (meadow ryegrass)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

ozone · growth · Lolium perenne (perennial ryegrass)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.