Paper · 2016 · Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Growth response of hybrid aspen (Populus × wettsteinii) and Populus trichocarpa to different pH levels and nutrient availabilities

Henrik Böhlenius; Rolf Övergaard; Håkan Asp

13
claims
19
verbatim quotes
11
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Populus plantations are mainly established on agricultural land, but natural forests soils typically have lower pHs and nutrient contents. In this study, growth responses of two commonly used Populus genotypes, hybrid aspen (Populus × wettsteinii Hämet-Ahti) and black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa Torr. & A. Gray ex Hook.), were monitored in the greenhouse in relation of changes in pH and fertilizer levels in quartz sand and forest moraine soil. In quartz sand, changes in pH had no impact on growth or mortality of the two species. In forest soils, the lowest pH values, i.e., 3.5 and 4.0, caused plant mortality for P. trichocarpa but not for P. × wettsteinii. Growth optimum of P. trichocarpa occurred at a pH range of 5.5–6.5, whereas P. × wettsteinii showed a broader growth optimum at a pH range of 4.0–7.0. Fertilization expanded the pH range of optimum growth for P. trichocarpa but not for P. × wettsteinii. In both species, foliar content of nitrogen and potassium content increased after fertilization, whereas the foliar content of phosphorus was similar to unfertilized plants. Our results suggest that differences in tolerance to low pH values between P. × wettsteinii and P. trichocarpa might be connected to tolerance against aluminum. These findings may improve future establishment methods and identification of poplar genotypes suitable for forest land.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Changing quartz sand pH did not affect hybrid aspen growth or mortality.

Taxon
Populus × wettsteiniie1
Treatment
changes in pHe0
Outcome
growth or mortalitye0
Direction
no impacte0
Setting
quartz sande0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In quartz sand, changes in pH had no impact on growth or mortality of the two species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–538 · show in text ↑
e1

“hybrid aspen (Populus × wettsteinii Hämet-Ahti)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–258 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Changing quartz sand pH did not affect P. trichocarpa growth or mortality.

Taxon
Populus trichocarpaPopulus trichocarpae1
Treatment
changes in pHe0
Outcome
growth or mortalitye0
Direction
no impacte0
Setting
quartz sande0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus trichocarpa
Populus trichocarpa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDaniel Mayer (mav) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In quartz sand, changes in pH had no impact on growth or mortality of the two species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–538 · show in text ↑
e1

“black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa Torr. & A. Gray ex Hook.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–326 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forest soil pH 3.5 and 4.0 caused P. trichocarpa mortality.

Taxon
P. trichocarpaPopulus trichocarpae0
Treatment
lowest pH valuese0
Outcome
plant mortalitye0
Value
3.5 and 4.0e0
Setting
forest soilse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus trichocarpa
Populus trichocarpa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDaniel Mayer (mav) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In forest soils, the lowest pH values, i.e., 3.5 and 4.0, caused plant mortality for P. trichocarpa but not for P. × wettsteinii.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–668 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forest soil pH 3.5 and 4.0 did not cause P. × wettsteinii mortality.

Taxon
P. × wettsteiniie0
Treatment
lowest pH valuese0
Outcome
plant mortalitye0
Value
3.5 and 4.0e0
Setting
forest soilse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“In forest soils, the lowest pH values, i.e., 3.5 and 4.0, caused plant mortality for P. trichocarpa but not for P. × wettsteinii.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–668 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. trichocarpa growth optimum was pH 5.5–6.5.

Taxon
P. trichocarpaPopulus trichocarpae0
Outcome
Growth optimume0
Direction
optimume0
Value
5.5–6.5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus trichocarpa
Populus trichocarpa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDaniel Mayer (mav) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth optimum of P. trichocarpa occurred at a pH range of 5.5–6.5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–735 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. × wettsteinii growth optimum spanned pH 4.0–7.0.

Taxon
P. × wettsteiniie0
Outcome
growth optimume0
Direction
broadere0
Value
4.0–7.0e0

Verbatim

e0

“P. × wettsteinii showed a broader growth optimum at a pH range of 4.0–7.0.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–819 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization expanded the pH range of optimum growth for P. trichocarpa.

Taxon
P. trichocarpaPopulus trichocarpae0
Treatment
Fertilizatione0
Outcome
pH range of optimum growthe0
Direction
expandede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus trichocarpa
Populus trichocarpa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDaniel Mayer (mav) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilization expanded the pH range of optimum growth for P. trichocarpa but not for P. × wettsteinii.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–922 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization did not expand the pH range of optimum growth for P. × wettsteinii.

Taxon
P. × wettsteiniie0
Treatment
Fertilizatione0
Outcome
pH range of optimum growthe0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Qualifier
but not for P. × wettsteiniie0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilization expanded the pH range of optimum growth for P. trichocarpa but not for P. × wettsteinii.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–922 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization increased foliar nitrogen and potassium in P. trichocarpa.

Taxon
P. trichocarpaPopulus trichocarpae1
Treatment
fertilizatione0
Outcome
foliar content of nitrogen and potassium contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus trichocarpa
Populus trichocarpa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDaniel Mayer (mav) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both species, foliar content of nitrogen and potassium content increased after fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1018 · show in text ↑
e1

“Growth optimum of P. trichocarpa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–701 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization increased foliar nitrogen and potassium in P. × wettsteinii.

Taxon
P. × wettsteiniie1
Treatment
fertilizatione0
Outcome
foliar content of nitrogen and potassium contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In both species, foliar content of nitrogen and potassium content increased after fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1018 · show in text ↑
e1

“whereas P. × wettsteinii showed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–768 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar phosphorus was similar to unfertilized plants in P. trichocarpa.

Taxon
P. trichocarpaPopulus trichocarpae1
Outcome
foliar content of phosphoruse0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
unfertilized plantse0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus trichocarpa
Populus trichocarpa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDaniel Mayer (mav) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the foliar content of phosphorus was similar to unfertilized plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1096 · show in text ↑
e1

“Growth optimum of P. trichocarpa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–701 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar phosphorus was similar to unfertilized plants in P. × wettsteinii.

Taxon
P. × wettsteiniie1
Outcome
foliar content of phosphoruse0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
unfertilized plantse0

Not reportedTreatment

Verbatim

e0

“the foliar content of phosphorus was similar to unfertilized plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1096 · show in text ↑
e1

“whereas P. × wettsteinii showed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–768 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest aluminum tolerance may explain differing low-pH tolerance between the poplars.

Taxon
P. × wettsteiniie0
Compound
aluminume0
Outcome
differences in tolerance to low pH valuese0
Qualifier
might be connectede0

Verbatim

e0

“differences in tolerance to low pH values between P. × wettsteinii and P. trichocarpa might be connected to tolerance against aluminum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1257 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Populus trichocarpa (black cottonwood)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.