Paper · 2016 · Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science

Potted rice straw increased the antioxidase activity and growth of Chinese green cabbage seedlings and altered the soil microbial community

Hong-Sheng Wu; Ming-Yan Wang; Ji Zhou; et al.

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To reuse rice straw and decrease the environmental pollution and resource waste that are caused by burning rice straw in China, this agricultural resource is increasingly being used to make pots with added formaldehyde and other chemicals for cultivating vegetables. A study was conducted to investigate the effects of rice straw-based pot powder on the growth and antioxidase activity of Chinese green cabbage seedlings and the soil microbial community using a molecular analysis. The results showed that there was no negative effect from the powder on cabbage growth, given that the cabbage plants that were treated with powder (1.2–3.2 g kg−1 rice straw pot powder) exhibited 1.8 to 2.5 times higher fresh biomass than the control (0 g kg−1 powder). Minor differences were found among key reactive oxygen system enzyme activities, but the superoxide dismutase activity decreased by 33–55% (1.2–3.2 g kg−1 powder). The phenylalanine ammonia-lyase activity of green Chinese cabbage that was treated with powder (1.2–3.2 g kg−1 rice straw pot powder) was 1.5 times higher than the no-powder control. The soil microbial diversity was changed, and the community composition was altered depending on the rates of powder application, according to a polymerase chain reaction-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cabbage treated with 1.2–3.2 g kg−1 rice straw pot powder had 1.8 to 2.5 times higher fresh biomass than the control.

Treatment
1.2–3.2 g kg−1 rice straw pot powdere0
Outcome
fresh biomasse0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.8 to 2.5 timese0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cabbage plants that were treated with powder (1.2–3.2 g kg−1 rice straw pot powder) exhibited 1.8 to 2.5 times higher fresh biomass than the control (0 g kg−1 powder)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–751 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Superoxide dismutase activity in cabbage decreased by 33–55% with 1.2–3.2 g kg−1 powder.

Taxon
Chinese green cabbaget0
Treatment
1.2–3.2 g kg−1 powdere0
Outcome
superoxide dismutase activitye0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
33–55%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Chinese green cabbage seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“the superoxide dismutase activity decreased by 33–55% (1.2–3.2 g kg−1 powder)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–915 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase activity of green Chinese cabbage treated with the powder was 1.5 times higher than the no-powder control.

Taxon
green Chinese cabbageBrassica rapa subsp. pekinensise0
Treatment
powdere0
Outcome
phenylalanine ammonia-lyase activitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.5 timese0
Comparator
no-powder controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The phenylalanine ammonia-lyase activity of green Chinese cabbage that was treated with powder (1.2–3.2 g kg−1 rice straw pot powder) was 1.5 times higher than the no-powder control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1098 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only minor differences were found among key reactive oxygen system enzyme activities.

Taxon
Chinese green cabbaget0
Outcome
key reactive oxygen system enzyme activitiese0
Direction
Minor differencese0

Verbatim

t0

“Chinese green cabbage seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“Minor differences were found among key reactive oxygen system enzyme activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–832 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil microbial diversity changed and community composition was altered depending on the powder application rate.

Taxon
soil microbial communityt0
Treatment
powder applicatione0
Outcome
soil microbial diversitye0
Direction
changede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“altered the soil microbial community”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–139 · show in text ↑
e0

“The soil microbial diversity was changed, and the community composition was altered depending on the rates of powder application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1228 · show in text ↑

Oryza sativa · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

botanical · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

75 papers: 42 positive, 33 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.