Abstract

Soil degradation and limited arable land continue to constrain vegetable production in upland areas of the Philippines. This study evaluated the growth and yield performance of kale (Brassica oleracea L. var. acephala) grown in organic-based soilless substrates under greenhouse conditions. A Completely Randomized Design (CRD) was employed with 5 treatments replicated three times. The treatments consisted of combinations of Processed Chicken Manure (PCM), Carbonized Rice Hull (CRH) and various organic additives, including Vermicompost (VC), Coconut Coir Dust (CCD), Spent Mushroom Compost (SMC) and a control (garden soil + river sand). Growth parameters measured included plant height (PH), root length (RL) and root weight (RW), while yield components comprised leaf length (LL), leaf number (LN), economic yield (EY), biological yield (BY) and harvest index (HI). Results showed that Treatment 1 (PCM + CRH + VC) and Treatment 3 (PCM + CRH + SMC) produced the tallest plants, longest leaves and highest yields. Treatment 2 (PCM + CRH + CCD) promoted superior root development, whereas the control (T₅) recorded the lowest performance in both growth and yield attributes. Organic-based soilless substrates, particularly those enriched with VC or SMC, significantly enhance kale growth and productivity under controlled conditions. The use of these sustainable substrate formulations offers a viable approach to improving vegetable production in land-constrained and ecologically fragile upland environments, supporting the goals of sustainable and climate-resilient agriculture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCM + CRH + VC produced the tallest kale plants, longest leaves and highest yields.

Treatment
Treatment 1 (PCM + CRH + VC)e0
Outcome
tallest plants, longest leaves and highest yieldse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment 1 (PCM + CRH + VC) and Treatment 3 (PCM + CRH + SMC) produced the tallest plants, longest leaves and highest yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1017 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth and yield performance of kale (Brassica oleracea L. var. acephala) in organic-based soilless substrates under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCM + CRH + SMC produced the tallest kale plants, longest leaves and highest yields.

Treatment
Treatment 3 (PCM + CRH + SMC)e0
Outcome
tallest plants, longest leaves and highest yieldse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment 1 (PCM + CRH + VC) and Treatment 3 (PCM + CRH + SMC) produced the tallest plants, longest leaves and highest yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1017 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth and yield performance of kale (Brassica oleracea L. var. acephala) in organic-based soilless substrates under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCM + CRH + CCD gave superior root development.

Treatment
Treatment 2 (PCM + CRH + CCD)e0
Outcome
root developmente0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment 2 (PCM + CRH + CCD) promoted superior root development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1083 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth and yield performance of kale (Brassica oleracea L. var. acephala) in organic-based soilless substrates under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–138 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The control had the lowest growth and yield performance.

Treatment
control (T₅)e0
Outcome
growth and yield attributese0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the control (T₅) recorded the lowest performance in both growth and yield attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1177 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth and yield performance of kale (Brassica oleracea L. var. acephala) in organic-based soilless substrates under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic-based soilless substrates significantly enhanced kale growth and productivity.

Treatment
Organic-based soilless substratese0
Outcome
kale growth and productivitye0
Direction
enhancee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Organic-based soilless substrates, particularly those enriched with VC or SMC, significantly enhance kale growth and productivity under controlled conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1336 · show in text ↑

Oryza sativa · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Oryza sativa · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

growing medium · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

growing medium · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 13 positive, 4 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

fertilization · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

264 papers: 240 positive, 24 negative or no effect

239 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

260 papers more in this group

See all 264 papers →

fertilization · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

496 papers: 445 positive, 51 negative or no effect

444 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

492 papers more in this group

See all 496 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.