Paper · 2015 · Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences

Morphological and Physiological Responses of Six Grape Genotypes to NaCl Salt Stress

Saed J. Owais

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A C T Salt contaminated areas are considered as, a critical problem in arid and semi-arid regions that limit the yield potential of agricultural crops. In the present study, NaCl salt stress susceptibility was assessed in five Jordanian grapes landraces (Salti, Zani, Red Glob, Darawishi and SoriBaladi) and B41 root stock using two levels of salt stress (6000 and 12000 ppm NaCl) in addition to the control during 2013 and 2014 growing season under controlled condition. Plant biomass (root and shoot), physiological parameters (relative water content and total chlorophyll content) and leaves mineral content were significantly (p<0.01) reduced in response to salt stress. High NaCl causes more pronounced reductions in these parameters than low NaCl treatment indicating the harmful effect of NaCl on plant biomass and physiological performance of the grape. Proline accumulated two and three time more under low and high salinity treatment than their respective control. The interactive effects of genotype and salt level treatment were significant (p<0.01) on plant biomass, mineral content and physiological parameter indicating, high level of variability exists among studied grape genotypes in response to salt stress. The lowest reductions in plant biomass and physiological parameters were recorded in Salti and Darawishi and consequently they could be considered as potential donors for genes for salt stress tolerance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress significantly reduced root and shoot biomass.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
salt stresse0
Outcome
Plant biomass (root and shoot)e0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Plant biomass (root and shoot), physiological parameters (relative water content and total chlorophyll content) and leaves mineral content were significantly (p<0.01) reduced in response to salt stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–674 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress significantly reduced relative water and total chlorophyll content.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
salt stresse0
Outcome
relative water content and total chlorophyll contente0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Plant biomass (root and shoot), physiological parameters (relative water content and total chlorophyll content) and leaves mineral content were significantly (p<0.01) reduced in response to salt stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–674 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress significantly reduced leaf mineral content.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
salt stresse0
Outcome
leaves mineral contente0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“leaves mineral content were significantly (p<0.01) reduced in response to salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–673 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High NaCl caused larger reductions in biomass and physiological performance than low NaCl.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
High NaCle0
Outcome
these parameterse0
Direction
more pronounced reductionse0
Comparator
low NaCl treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“High NaCl causes more pronounced reductions in these parameters than low NaCl treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–762 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline accumulated two times more under low salinity than control.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
lowe0
Outcome
Prolinee0
Direction
accumulatede0
Value
twoe0
Comparator
their respective controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Proline accumulated two and three time more under low and high salinity treatment than their respective control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–974 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline accumulated three times more under high salinity than control.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
high salinity treatmente0
Outcome
Prolinee0
Direction
accumulatede0
Value
three timee0
Comparator
their respective controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Proline accumulated two and three time more under low and high salinity treatment than their respective control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–974 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–64 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype and salt-level interaction significantly affected plant biomass, mineral content and physiological parameters.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
salt level treatmente0
Outcome
plant biomass, mineral content and physiological parametere0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The interactive effects of genotype and salt level treatment were significant (p<0.01) on plant biomass, mineral content and physiological parameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salti and Darawishi had the lowest reductions in biomass and physiological parameters.

Taxon
Grapet0
Material
Salti and Darawishie0
Outcome
plant biomass and physiological parameterse0
Direction
lowest reductionse0

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest reductions in plant biomass and physiological parameters were recorded in Salti and Darawishi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1331 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–64 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors consider Salti and Darawishi potential sources of salt-tolerance genes.

Taxon
Grapet0
Material
Salti and Darawishie0
Outcome
potential donors for genes for salt stress tolerancee0

Verbatim

e0

“Salti and Darawishi and consequently they could be considered as potential donors for genes for salt stress tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1429 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–64 · show in text ↑

salinity · growth · VitisResults differ

26 papers: 1 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

salinity · physiology: water · VitisPositive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

salinity · nutrient: content · VitisPositive and negative results

8 papers: 1 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.