Paper · 2016 · PLoS ONE

Differences in Sugar Accumulation and Mobilization between Sequential and Non-Sequential Senescence Wheat Cultivars under Natural and Drought Conditions

Huarong Shi; Bin Wang; Piaojuan Yang; et al.

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
88
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Wheat leaf non-sequential senescence at the late grain-filling stage involves the early senescence of younger flag leaves compared to that observed in older second leaves. On the other hand, sequential senescence involves leaf senescence that follows an age-related pattern, in which flag leaves are the latest to undergo senescence. The characteristics of sugar metabolism in two sequential senescence cultivars and two non-sequential senescence cultivars under both natural and drought conditions were studied to elucidate the underlying mechanism of drought tolerance in two different senescence modes. The results showed that compared to sequential senescence wheat cultivars, under natural and drought conditions, non-sequential senescence wheat cultivars showed a higher leaf net photosynthetic rate, higher soluble sugar levels in leaves, leaf sheaths, and internodes, higher leaf sucrose synthase (SS) and sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS) activity, and higher grain SS activity, thereby suggesting that non-sequential senescence wheat cultivars had stronger source activity. Spike weight, grain weight per spike, and 100-grain weight of non-sequential senescence cultivars at maturity were significantly higher than those of sequential senescence cultivars under both natural and drought conditions. These findings indicate that the higher rate of accumulation and the higher mobilization of soluble sugar in the leaves, leaf sheaths and internodes of non-sequential senescence cultivars improve grain weight and drought tolerance. At the late grain-filling stage, drought conditions adversely affected leaf chlorophyll content, net photosynthetic rate, soluble sugar and sucrose content, SS and SPS activity, gain SS activity, and weight. This study showed that higher rates of soluble sugar accumulation in the source was one of the reasons of triggering leaf non-sequential senescence, and higher rates of soluble sugar mobilization during leaf non-sequential senescence promoted high and stable wheat yield and drought tolerance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-sequential senescence cultivars had higher leaf net photosynthetic rate under natural and drought conditions.

Material
non-sequential senescence wheat cultivarse0
Outcome
leaf net photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
sequential senescence wheat cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“compared to sequential senescence wheat cultivars, under natural and drought conditions, non-sequential senescence wheat cultivars showed a higher leaf net photosynthetic rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–805 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-sequential cultivars had higher soluble sugar in leaves, leaf sheaths and internodes under both conditions.

Material
non-sequential senescence wheat cultivarse0
Outcome
soluble sugar levels in leaves, leaf sheaths, and internodese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
sequential senescence wheat cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“compared to sequential senescence wheat cultivars, under natural and drought conditions, non-sequential senescence wheat cultivars showed a higher leaf net photosynthetic rate, higher soluble sugar levels in leaves, leaf sheaths, and internodes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–874 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf SS and SPS activities were higher in non-sequential cultivars under natural and drought conditions.

Material
non-sequential senescence wheat cultivarse1
Outcome
leaf sucrose synthase (SS) and sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS) activitye0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“higher leaf sucrose synthase (SS) and sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS) activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–955 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to sequential senescence wheat cultivars, under natural and drought conditions, non-sequential senescence wheat cultivars showed a higher leaf net photosynthetic rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–805 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain SS activity was higher in non-sequential cultivars.

Outcome
grain SS activitye0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“higher grain SS activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–985 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spike weight, grain weight per spike and 100-grain weight were significantly higher in non-sequential cultivars under both conditions.

Material
non-sequential senescence cultivarse0
Organ / stage
at maturitye0
Outcome
Spike weight, grain weight per spike, and 100-grain weighte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
sequential senescence cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“Spike weight, grain weight per spike, and 100-grain weight of non-sequential senescence cultivars at maturity were significantly higher than those of sequential senescence cultivars under both natural and drought conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1307 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher sugar accumulation and mobilization in non-sequential cultivars was interpreted to improve grain weight and drought tolerance.

Material
non-sequential senescence cultivarse0
Outcome
grain weight and drought tolerancee0
Qualifier
higher rate of accumulation and the higher mobilization of soluble sugare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“higher rate of accumulation and the higher mobilization of soluble sugar in the leaves, leaf sheaths and internodes of non-sequential senescence cultivars improve grain weight and drought tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1538 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought adversely affected leaf chlorophyll content, net photosynthetic rate and soluble sugar content at late grain filling.

Organ / stage
late grain-filling stagee0
Treatment
drought conditionse0
Outcome
leaf chlorophyll content, net photosynthetic rate, soluble sugar and sucrose contente0
Direction
adversely affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“At the late grain-filling stage, drought conditions adversely affected leaf chlorophyll content, net photosynthetic rate, soluble sugar and sucrose content, SS and SPS activity, gain SS activity, and weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1540–1747 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought adversely affected SS and SPS activity and grain SS activity at late grain filling.

Treatment
drought conditionse0
Outcome
SS and SPS activity, gain SS activitye0
Direction
adversely affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“At the late grain-filling stage, drought conditions adversely affected leaf chlorophyll content, net photosynthetic rate, soluble sugar and sucrose content, SS and SPS activity, gain SS activity, and weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1540–1747 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought adversely affected weight at late grain filling.

Treatment
drought conditionse0
Outcome
weighte0
Direction
adversely affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“At the late grain-filling stage, drought conditions adversely affected leaf chlorophyll content, net photosynthetic rate, soluble sugar and sucrose content, SS and SPS activity, gain SS activity, and weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1540–1747 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher source sugar accumulation was interpreted as a trigger of non-sequential leaf senescence.

Outcome
leaf non-sequential senescencee0
Qualifier
higher rates of soluble sugar accumulation in the sourcee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“higher rates of soluble sugar accumulation in the source was one of the reasons of triggering leaf non-sequential senescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1771–1895 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher sugar mobilization during non-sequential senescence was interpreted to promote high and stable wheat yield and drought tolerance.

Outcome
high and stable wheat yield and drought tolerancee0
Qualifier
higher rates of soluble sugar mobilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“higher rates of soluble sugar mobilization during leaf non-sequential senescence promoted high and stable wheat yield and drought tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1901–2040 · show in text ↑

drought · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

125 papers: 56 positive, 69 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

121 papers more in this group

See all 125 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

246 papers: 41 positive, 205 negative or no effect

204 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

242 papers more in this group

See all 246 papers →

drought · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

431 papers: 86 positive, 345 negative or no effect

344 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

427 papers more in this group

See all 431 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.