Paper · 2009 · The University of Malaya Research Repository (University of Malaya)

Influence of Water Deficit during Different Growth and Developmental Stages on the Contribution of Stored Pre-Anthesis Assimilates to Grain in Selected Durum and Bread Wheat Genotypes

Ali Moayedi; Amru Nasrulhaq Boyce; Syed Shahar Barakbah

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Under water deficit conditions, declining photosynthesis and the subsequent decline in assimilates during the grain filling stage can increase the contribution of pre-anthesis assimilates stored in the stems, to grain filling in order to prevent severe reduction in grain yield. Results of the present study, which tested five durum and bread wheat genotypes under four irrigation regimes in different growth and developmental stages, have shown that apart from the contribution of pre-anthesis assimilates to grain filling, which increased during the one-leaf until grain filling period under water deficit, dry matter translocation and dry matter translocation efficiency decreased at the floral initiation to grain filling stage. The remobilization contribution of pre-anthesis assimilates increased by 20 under water limitation during grain filling compared to optimum irrigation. In addition to this, genotype G2 (durum wheat) and cultivar G3 (bread wheat) exhibited the highest contribution of preanthesis assimilates to grain filling, which was associated with longer day to the heading and the plant height under the optimum moisture conditions. Furthermore, the spike dry weight, spike harvest index and spike partitioning coefficient were also higher in the G2 and G3 genotypes. © 2009, INSInet Publication.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-anthesis assimilate contribution to grain filling increased under water deficit from one-leaf to grain filling.

Taxon
durum and bread wheatt0
Treatment
water deficite0
Outcome
contribution of pre-anthesis assimilates to grain fillinge0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
one-leaf until grain filling periode0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the contribution of pre-anthesis assimilates to grain filling, which increased during the one-leaf until grain filling period under water deficit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–607 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum and Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter translocation decreased with water deficit at floral initiation to grain filling.

Taxon
durum and bread wheatt0
Treatment
water deficite1
Outcome
dry matter translocatione0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
floral initiation to grain filling stagee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“dry matter translocation and dry matter translocation efficiency decreased at the floral initiation to grain filling stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–731 · show in text ↑
e1

“under water deficit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–607 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum and Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter translocation efficiency decreased at floral initiation to grain filling.

Taxon
durum and bread wheatt0
Treatment
water deficite1
Outcome
dry matter translocation efficiencye0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
floral initiation to grain filling stagee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“dry matter translocation and dry matter translocation efficiency decreased at the floral initiation to grain filling stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–731 · show in text ↑
e1

“under water deficit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–607 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum and Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water limitation during grain filling increased remobilization contribution by 20 versus optimum irrigation.

Taxon
durum and bread wheatt0
Treatment
water limitation during grain fillinge0
Outcome
remobilization contribution of pre-anthesis assimilatese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20e0
Comparator
optimum irrigatione0

Verbatim

e0

“The remobilization contribution of pre-anthesis assimilates increased by 20 under water limitation during grain filling compared to optimum irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–883 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum and Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–173 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G2 durum wheat had the highest contribution of preanthesis assimilates to grain filling.

Material
G2e0
Outcome
contribution of preanthesis assimilates to grain fillinge0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genotype G2 (durum wheat) and cultivar G3 (bread wheat) exhibited the highest contribution of preanthesis assimilates to grain filling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1040 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G3 bread wheat had the highest contribution of preanthesis assimilates to grain filling.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume0
Material
G3e0
Outcome
contribution of preanthesis assimilates to grain fillinge0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genotype G2 (durum wheat) and cultivar G3 (bread wheat) exhibited the highest contribution of preanthesis assimilates to grain filling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1040 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher assimilate contribution in G2 and G3 was associated with longer time to heading and plant height under optimum moisture.

Taxon
durum and bread wheatt0
Material
G2 (durum wheat) and cultivar G3 (bread wheat)e0
Outcome
day to the heading and the plant heighte0
Direction
longere0
Qualifier
optimum moisture conditionse0

Verbatim

e0

“genotype G2 (durum wheat) and cultivar G3 (bread wheat) exhibited the highest contribution of preanthesis assimilates to grain filling, which was associated with longer day to the heading and the plant height under the optimum moisture conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1152 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum and Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–173 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spike dry weight, harvest index and partitioning coefficient were higher in G2 and G3.

Taxon
durum and bread wheatt0
Material
G2 and G3e0
Outcome
spike dry weight, spike harvest index and spike partitioning coefficiente0
Direction
highere0

Verbatim

e0

“the spike dry weight, spike harvest index and spike partitioning coefficient were also higher in the G2 and G3 genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1287 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum and Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–173 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Results differ

30 papers: 7 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

drought · yield · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 6 positive, 28 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

drought · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

431 papers: 86 positive, 345 negative or no effect

344 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

427 papers more in this group

See all 431 papers →

drought · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

632 papers: 95 positive, 537 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 537 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

628 papers more in this group

See all 632 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.