Paper · 2016 · Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research

Antioxidant and carbohydrate changes of two pomegranate cultivars under deficit irrigation stress

Morteza Ebtedaie; Akhtar Shekafandeh

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
13
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biochemical responses to water stress tolerance of two pomegranate cultivars, ‘Rabbab’ and ‘Shishehgap’. After the establishment of rooted stem cuttings of both cultivars under greenhouse conditions, they were treated with four levels of deficit irrigations (100%, 75%, 50% and 25% of field capacity) in a completely randomized design with four replications. The results showed a significant difference between the two cultivars regarding antioxidant enzymes activities. In both cultivars, the water stress increased the activity of superoxide dismutase, catalase and ascorbate peroxidase. However, at high water deficit (25% field capacity, FC), ‘Rabbab’ showed significantly higher enzyme activity than ‘Shishehgap’. In each level of irrigation, there were not considerable differences in peroxidase activity between the two cultivars. An increment of 162% and 65.5% in soluble sugar was gained at 50% FC in ‘Rabbab’ and ‘Shishehgap’, respectively. ‘Rabbab’ showed better growth performance in each level of irrigation than ‘Shishehgap’. Therefore, it can be concluded that 'Rabbab', with lesser decline in leaf relative water content (RWC), a strong antioxidant system and accumulation of more soluble carbohydrates, can resist higher water stress than 'Shishehgap'.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress increased the activity of superoxide dismutase, catalase and ascorbate peroxidase in both cultivars.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
water stresse1
Outcome
activity of superoxide dismutase, catalase and ascorbate peroxidasee1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pomegranate cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–65 · show in text ↑
e1

“In both cultivars, the water stress increased the activity of superoxide dismutase, catalase and ascorbate peroxidase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–634 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 25% field capacity, Rabbab had significantly higher enzyme activity than Shishehgap.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Material
Rabbabe2
Treatment
high water deficit (25% field capacity, FC)e2
Outcome
enzyme activitye2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
Shishehgape2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pomegranate cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–65 · show in text ↑
e2

“However, at high water deficit (25% field capacity, FC), ‘Rabbab’ showed significantly higher enzyme activity than ‘Shishehgap’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–763 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At each irrigation level there were no considerable differences in peroxidase activity between the two cultivars.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
each level of irrigatione3
Outcome
peroxidase activitye3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pomegranate cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–65 · show in text ↑
e3

“In each level of irrigation, there were not considerable differences in peroxidase activity between the two cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–882 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The two cultivars differed significantly in antioxidant enzyme activities.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Outcome
antioxidant enzymes activitiese4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pomegranate cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–65 · show in text ↑
e4

“The results showed a significant difference between the two cultivars regarding antioxidant enzymes activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–515 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rabbab soluble sugar increased by 162% at 50% field capacity.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Material
Rabbabe5
Treatment
50% FCe5
Outcome
soluble sugare5
Direction
incremente5
Value
162%e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pomegranate cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–65 · show in text ↑
e5

“An increment of 162% and 65.5% in soluble sugar was gained at 50% FC in ‘Rabbab’ and ‘Shishehgap’, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–995 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shishehgap soluble sugar increased by 65.5% at 50% field capacity.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Material
Shishehgape5
Treatment
50% FCe5
Outcome
soluble sugare5
Direction
incremente5
Value
65.5%e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pomegranate cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–65 · show in text ↑
e5

“An increment of 162% and 65.5% in soluble sugar was gained at 50% FC in ‘Rabbab’ and ‘Shishehgap’, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–995 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rabbab showed better growth performance than Shishehgap at each irrigation level.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Material
Rabbabe6
Treatment
each level of irrigatione6
Outcome
growth performancee6
Direction
bettere6
Comparator
Shishehgape6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pomegranate cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–65 · show in text ↑
e6

“‘Rabbab’ showed better growth performance in each level of irrigation than ‘Shishehgap’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1084 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rabbab showed lesser decline in leaf relative water content.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Material
Rabbabe1
Outcome
leaf relative water contente1
Direction
lesser declinee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pomegranate cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–65 · show in text ↑
e1

“'Rabbab', with lesser decline in leaf relative water content (RWC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1188 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rabbab can resist higher water stress than Shishehgap.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Material
Rabbabe1
Outcome
resist higher water stresse1
Comparator
Shishehgape1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pomegranate cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–65 · show in text ↑
e1

“'Rabbab', with lesser decline in leaf relative water content (RWC), a strong antioxidant system and accumulation of more soluble carbohydrates, can resist higher water stress than 'Shishehgap'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1314 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results differ

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.