Paper · 1996 · HortScience

Cover Crop and Tillage Effects on Production and Nitrogen Nutrition of Sweet Corn

Gary R. Cline; Anthony F. Silvernail

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A split-plot factorial experiment examined effects of tillage and winter cover crops on sweet corn. Main plots received tillage or no tillage. Cover crops consisted of hairy vetch, winter rye, or a mix, and N treatments consisted of plus or minus N fertilization. No significant effects of tillage on sweet corn yields were detected. Following corn not receiving inorganic N, vetch produced cover crop total N yields of 130 kg·ha –1 that were over three-times greater than those obtained with rye. Following rye winter covercrops, addition of ammonium nitrate to corn significantly ( P < 0.05) increased corn yields and foliar N concentrations compared to treatments not receiving N. However, following vetch, corn yields and foliar N concentrations obtained without N fertilization equaled those obtained with N fertilization following rye or vetch. Available soil N was significantly ( P < 0.05) greater following vetch compared to rye for ≈9 weeks after corn planting and peaked ≈4 weeks after planting. It was concluded that no-tillage sweet corn was successful and N fixed by vetch was able to sustain sweet corn production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage had no significant effect on sweet corn yields.

Taxon
sweet corne1
Treatment
tillagee1
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
no significant effectse1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“No significant effects of tillage on sweet corn yields were detected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–332 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Where corn received no inorganic N, vetch cover crops produced total N yields of 130 kg/ha, over three times greater than rye.

Taxon
vetche1
Outcome
cover crop total N yieldse1
Direction
greatere1
Value
130 kg·ha –1e1
Comparator
ryee1

Verbatim

e1

“vetch produced cover crop total N yields of 130 kg·ha –1 that were over three-times greater than those obtained with rye”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–496 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Following rye cover crops, ammonium nitrate addition to corn significantly increased corn yields and foliar N concentrations compared with no N.

Treatment
addition of ammonium nitratee1
Outcome
corn yields and foliar N concentrationse1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
Following rye winter covercropse1
Comparator
treatments not receiving Ne1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Following rye winter covercrops, addition of ammonium nitrate to corn significantly ( P < 0.05) increased corn yields and foliar N concentrations compared to treatments not receiving N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–682 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Following vetch, corn yields and foliar N concentrations without N fertilization equaled those with N fertilization following rye or vetch.

Treatment
with N fertilizatione1
Outcome
corn yields and foliar N concentrationse1
Direction
equalede1
Qualifier
following vetche1
Comparator
without N fertilizatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“following vetch, corn yields and foliar N concentrations obtained without N fertilization equaled those obtained with N fertilization following rye or vetch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–849 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Available soil N was significantly greater following vetch than rye for about 9 weeks after corn planting.

Taxon
vetche1
Outcome
Available soil Ne1
Direction
greatere1
Qualifier
for ≈9 weeks after corn plantinge1
Comparator
ryee1

Verbatim

e1

“Available soil N was significantly ( P < 0.05) greater following vetch compared to rye for ≈9 weeks after corn planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–970 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Available soil N peaked about 4 weeks after planting.

Taxon
vetche1
Outcome
Available soil Ne1
Value
≈4 weeks after plantinge1

Verbatim

e1

“Available soil N was significantly ( P < 0.05) greater following vetch compared to rye for ≈9 weeks after corn planting and peaked ≈4 weeks after planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1005 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that no-tillage sweet corn was successful and that N fixed by vetch was able to sustain sweet corn production.

Taxon
sweet corne1
Treatment
no-tillagee1
Outcome
sweet corn productione1

Verbatim

e1

“no-tillage sweet corn was successful and N fixed by vetch was able to sustain sweet corn production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1128 · show in text ↑

ammonium nitrate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 20 positive, 3 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

422 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,485 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.