Abstract
In order to investigate some physiological responses and grain yield of five chickpea cultivars under different levels of moisture and salinity, two experiments (i.e. a pot and a field experiment) were conducted in 2012. In the pot experiment, effects of four salt levels (i.e. control, 50, 75 and 100 mM of NaCl) on five chickpea cultivars, i.e. Arman, Azad, Hashem, ILC-482 and Noorabad were studied in a 3-replicate factorial completely random design experiment. In the field experiment, responses of the latter cultivars to four moisture regimes (i.e. no irrigation, irrigation after 75, 100 and 150 mm of evaporation) based on evaporation from a Class-A Standard Pan were evaluated in a 3-replicate split-plot randomized complete block experiment. Data obtained from the pot experiment indicated that proline accumulation, Na+ concentration and Na+/K+ were increased, but K+ concentration, relative water content and plant dry mass were decreased with increase in salt level. Since cultivar ILC-482 tended to indicate a greater proline concentration, in contrary to a smaller Na+ concentration and plant dry mass, compared to the remaining cultivars, it seemed to be more tolerant to the salinity. Data from the field experiment confirmed that delayed irrigation leads to increase in proline accumulation and decreases in leaf area index, plant dry mass and grain yield. Irrigating chickpea after 75, 100 and 150 mm evaporation resulted in 1964, 1675 and 1503 kg/ha of grain yield, leading to 114%, 84% and 64% increases in grain yield, respectively, compared to the no irrigation control. Cultivars Noorabad and Hashem produced the greatest (i.e. 1610 kg/ha) and smallest (i.e. 1361 kg/ha) grain yields, respectively. According to the findings of this one-year field study, seeding cultivar Noorabad concomitant to irrigation after 150 mm evaporation could, perhaps, lead to a substantial increase in grain yield in Noorabad region of the Lorestan Province in Iran. Though, cultivar ILC482 tended to indicate a more stable plant dry mass, when subjected to different irrigation regimes and different levels of saline water.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 20
Claim · model-written summary
proline accumulation increased as salt level increased.
- Taxon
- Chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- increase in salt levele0
- Outcome
- proline accumulatione0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“proline accumulation, Na+ concentration and Na+/K+ were increased, but K+ concentration, relative water content and plant dry mass were decreased with increase in salt level”
Claim · model-written summary
Na+ concentration increased as salt level increased.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- increase in salt levele0
- Outcome
- Na+ concentratione0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“proline accumulation, Na+ concentration and Na+/K+ were increased, but K+ concentration, relative water content and plant dry mass were decreased with increase in salt level”
Claim · model-written summary
Na+/K+ increased as salt level increased.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- increase in salt levele0
- Outcome
- Na+/K+e0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“proline accumulation, Na+ concentration and Na+/K+ were increased, but K+ concentration, relative water content and plant dry mass were decreased with increase in salt level”
Claim · model-written summary
K+ concentration decreased as salt level increased.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- increase in salt levele0
- Outcome
- K+ concentratione0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“proline accumulation, Na+ concentration and Na+/K+ were increased, but K+ concentration, relative water content and plant dry mass were decreased with increase in salt level”
Claim · model-written summary
relative water content decreased as salt level increased.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- increase in salt levele0
- Outcome
- relative water contente0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“proline accumulation, Na+ concentration and Na+/K+ were increased, but K+ concentration, relative water content and plant dry mass were decreased with increase in salt level”
Claim · model-written summary
plant dry mass decreased as salt level increased.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- increase in salt levele0
- Outcome
- plant dry masse0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“proline accumulation, Na+ concentration and Na+/K+ were increased, but K+ concentration, relative water content and plant dry mass were decreased with increase in salt level”
Claim · model-written summary
ILC-482 tended to have greater proline concentration than the other cultivars.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Material
- ILC-482e0
- Outcome
- proline concentratione0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- remaining cultivarse0
Not reportedTreatment
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“cultivar ILC-482 tended to indicate a greater proline concentration, in contrary to a smaller Na+ concentration and plant dry mass, compared to the remaining cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
ILC-482 tended to have smaller Na+ concentration than the other cultivars.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Material
- ILC-482e0
- Outcome
- Na+ concentratione0
- Direction
- smallere0
- Comparator
- remaining cultivarse0
Not reportedTreatment
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“cultivar ILC-482 tended to indicate a greater proline concentration, in contrary to a smaller Na+ concentration and plant dry mass, compared to the remaining cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
ILC-482 tended to have smaller plant dry mass than the other cultivars.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Material
- ILC-482e0
- Outcome
- plant dry masse0
- Direction
- smallere0
- Comparator
- remaining cultivarse0
Not reportedTreatment
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“cultivar ILC-482 tended to indicate a greater proline concentration, in contrary to a smaller Na+ concentration and plant dry mass, compared to the remaining cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Delayed irrigation increase proline accumulation.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- delayed irrigatione0
- Outcome
- proline accumulatione0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“delayed irrigation leads to increase in proline accumulation and decreases in leaf area index, plant dry mass and grain yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Delayed irrigation decreases leaf area index.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- delayed irrigatione0
- Outcome
- leaf area indexe0
- Direction
- decreasese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“delayed irrigation leads to increase in proline accumulation and decreases in leaf area index, plant dry mass and grain yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Delayed irrigation decreases plant dry mass.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- delayed irrigatione0
- Outcome
- plant dry masse0
- Direction
- decreasese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“delayed irrigation leads to increase in proline accumulation and decreases in leaf area index, plant dry mass and grain yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Delayed irrigation decreases grain yield.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- delayed irrigatione0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- decreasese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“delayed irrigation leads to increase in proline accumulation and decreases in leaf area index, plant dry mass and grain yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation after 75 mm evaporation increased grain yield to 1964 kg/ha, 114% above no irrigation.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Irrigating chickpea after 75, 100 and 150 mm evaporatione0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Value
- 114%e0
- Comparator
- no irrigation controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“Irrigating chickpea after 75, 100 and 150 mm evaporation resulted in 1964, 1675 and 1503 kg/ha of grain yield, leading to 114%, 84% and 64% increases in grain yield, respectively, compared to the no irrigation control”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation after 100 mm evaporation increased grain yield to 1675 kg/ha, 84% above no irrigation.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Irrigating chickpea after 75, 100 and 150 mm evaporatione0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Value
- 84%e0
- Comparator
- no irrigation controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“Irrigating chickpea after 75, 100 and 150 mm evaporation resulted in 1964, 1675 and 1503 kg/ha of grain yield, leading to 114%, 84% and 64% increases in grain yield, respectively, compared to the no irrigation control”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation after 150 mm evaporation increased grain yield to 1503 kg/ha, 64% above no irrigation.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Irrigating chickpea after 75, 100 and 150 mm evaporatione0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Value
- 64%e0
- Comparator
- no irrigation controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“Irrigating chickpea after 75, 100 and 150 mm evaporation resulted in 1964, 1675 and 1503 kg/ha of grain yield, leading to 114%, 84% and 64% increases in grain yield, respectively, compared to the no irrigation control”
Claim · model-written summary
Noorabad produced the greatest grain yield, 1610 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Material
- Noorabade0
- Outcome
- grain yieldse0
- Direction
- greateste0
- Value
- 1610 kg/hae0
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“Cultivars Noorabad and Hashem produced the greatest (i.e. 1610 kg/ha) and smallest (i.e. 1361 kg/ha) grain yields, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Hashem produced the smallest grain yield, 1361 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Material
- Hasheme0
- Outcome
- grain yieldse0
- Direction
- smalleste0
- Value
- 1361 kg/hae0
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“Cultivars Noorabad and Hashem produced the greatest (i.e. 1610 kg/ha) and smallest (i.e. 1361 kg/ha) grain yields, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
ILC482 tended toward more stable dry mass across irrigation and salinity regimes.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Material
- ILC482e0
- Outcome
- more stable plant dry masse0
- Qualifier
- different irrigation regimes and different levels of saline watere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“cultivar ILC482 tended to indicate a more stable plant dry mass, when subjected to different irrigation regimes and different levels of saline water”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors tentatively recommend Noorabad with irrigation after 150 mm evaporation to increase yield.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Material
- Noorabade0
- Outcome
- seeding cultivar Noorabad concomitant to irrigation after 150 mm evaporatione0
- Setting
- Noorabad region of the Lorestan Province in Irane0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“seeding cultivar Noorabad concomitant to irrigation after 150 mm evaporation could, perhaps, lead to a substantial increase in grain yield in Noorabad region of the Lorestan Province in Iran”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
37 papers more in this group
See all 41 papers →salinity · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
62 papers more in this group
See all 66 papers →salinity · physiology: ion balance · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →irrigation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
112 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
120 papers more in this group
See all 124 papers →salinity · physiology: water · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
22 papers in the same direction as this paper
- negative
- negative
- negative
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.