Abstract
Micronutrient malnutrition is a threatening health issue mainly among the developing countries. Thus cereal biofortification must be under attention of researchers in addition to yield improvement in order to feed the increasing world population. In order to investigate the effects of various sources of nutrients on maize biofortification, growth and yield, a field experiment was conducted at the research station of the Faculty of Agriculture, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran in 2012. The experiment was carried out as a randomized complete block design with a factorial arrangement in 3 replicates. Studied factors (4 factors) were Vermicompost (V 0 and V1), inoculation with and without Thiobacillus thiooxidans (B 0 and B 1), Fe chelate foliar spraying (F 0 and F 1) and Zn chelate foliar application (Z 0 and Z 1). The results showed that maize grain yield was improved by application of vermicompost (20.9%) and inoculation with Thiobacillus (13.1%). Biofortification demonstrated that vermicompost and Thiobacillus were highly effective on the micronutrient content of grain, improving Fe (12.7% and 12.1%, respectively) and Zn (29.2% and 17.5%, respectively) content. Although Fe and Zn application improved grain yield slightly (5.8% and 8.0%, respectively), they were effective for maize biofortification. Although Fe and Zn foliar application had slight effects on plant yield, yet Fe application increased Fe content by 12.9%. However, Zn application increased the content of N by 6.7%, Zn by 12.6% and protein by 7.2%. Farmers must be encouraged to apply micronutrient fertilizers to their fields in order to increase the quality of their products.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Vermicompost improved maize grain yield by 20.9%.
Zea maysNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“maize grain yield was improved by application of vermicompost (20.9%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Thiobacillus inoculation improved maize grain yield by 13.1%.
- Treatment
- inoculation with Thiobacilluse0
- Interactor
- ThiobacillusThiobacilluse0symbiont
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 13.1%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“maize grain yield was improved by application of vermicompost (20.9%) and inoculation with Thiobacillus (13.1%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Vermicompost improved maize grain iron content by 12.7%.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“vermicompost and Thiobacillus were highly effective on the micronutrient content of grain, improving Fe (12.7% and 12.1%, respectively)”
t0“Maize biofortification and yield improvement through organic biochemical nutrient management”
Claim · model-written summary
Thiobacillus improved maize grain iron content by 12.1%.
- Organ / stage
- graine0
- Treatment
- Thiobacilluse0
- Interactor
- ThiobacillusThiobacilluse0symbiont
- Outcome
- Fee0
- Direction
- improvinge0
- Value
- 12.1%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“vermicompost and Thiobacillus were highly effective on the micronutrient content of grain, improving Fe (12.7% and 12.1%, respectively)”
t0“Maize biofortification and yield improvement through organic biochemical nutrient management”
Claim · model-written summary
Vermicompost improved maize grain zinc content by 29.2%.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“vermicompost and Thiobacillus were highly effective on the micronutrient content of grain, improving Fe (12.7% and 12.1%, respectively) and Zn (29.2% and 17.5%, respectively) content”
t0“Maize biofortification and yield improvement through organic biochemical nutrient management”
Claim · model-written summary
Thiobacillus improved maize grain zinc content by 17.5%.
- Organ / stage
- graine0
- Treatment
- Thiobacilluse0
- Interactor
- ThiobacillusThiobacilluse0symbiont
- Outcome
- Zne0
- Direction
- improvinge0
- Value
- 17.5%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“vermicompost and Thiobacillus were highly effective on the micronutrient content of grain, improving Fe (12.7% and 12.1%, respectively) and Zn (29.2% and 17.5%, respectively) content”
t0“Maize biofortification and yield improvement through organic biochemical nutrient management”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar Fe application improved maize grain yield slightly by 5.8%.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Although Fe and Zn application improved grain yield slightly (5.8% and 8.0%, respectively)”
t0“Maize biofortification and yield improvement through organic biochemical nutrient management”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar Zn application improved maize grain yield slightly by 8.0%.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Although Fe and Zn application improved grain yield slightly (5.8% and 8.0%, respectively)”
t0“Maize biofortification and yield improvement through organic biochemical nutrient management”
Claim · model-written summary
Fe application increased maize Fe content by 12.9%.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Fe application increased Fe content by 12.9%”
t0“Maize biofortification and yield improvement through organic biochemical nutrient management”
Claim · model-written summary
Zn application increased maize N content by 6.7%.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Zn application increased the content of N by 6.7%”
t0“Maize biofortification and yield improvement through organic biochemical nutrient management”
Claim · model-written summary
Zn application increased maize Zn content by 12.6%.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Zn application increased the content of N by 6.7%, Zn by 12.6%”
t0“Maize biofortification and yield improvement through organic biochemical nutrient management”
Claim · model-written summary
Zn application increased maize protein content by 7.2%.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Zn application increased the content of N by 6.7%, Zn by 12.6% and protein by 7.2%”
t0“Maize biofortification and yield improvement through organic biochemical nutrient management”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend micronutrient fertilizers to improve product quality.
- Outcome
- apply micronutrient fertilizers to their fieldse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Farmers must be encouraged to apply micronutrient fertilizers to their fields in order to increase the quality of their products”
t0“Maize biofortification and yield improvement through organic biochemical nutrient management”
The same questions in other papers
zinc atom · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
38 papers more in this group
See all 42 papers →iron atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
69 papers more in this group
See all 73 papers →zinc atom · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
198 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
231 papers more in this group
See all 235 papers →zinc atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
390 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
437 papers more in this group
See all 441 papers →zinc atom · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
40 papers more in this group
See all 44 papers →iron atom · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
50 papers more in this group
See all 54 papers →Thiobacillus · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Thiobacillus · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.