Paper · 2012 · Annals of biological research

The effects of on-farm seed priming and planting date on emergence characteristics, yield and yield components of a corn cultivar (S.C. 260) in Hamedan

Raana Mousavi; M. A. Aboutalebian; Ali Sepehri

11
claims
30
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To evaluate the effects of on-farm seed priming treatments and planting date on emergence characteristics, yield, yield components and harvest index of corn, an experiment was conducted in Hamedan, research farm of Bu-Ali Sina University in 2010 as split plot in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Main plots included three planting dates containing early, on-time and late seeding time and subplots were representative of four on-farm seed priming treatments (priming with tap water, urea and zinc solutions and no primed). Results showed that the first planting date using zinc solution increased rate of emergence as well 30%. E mergence percent was increased in the first planting date with using zinc solution by10% and in the second and third planting dates with using urea solution by 13%. However in all planting dates priming with tap water produced maximum grain yield compared to no primed treatment. In this experiment seed priming increased the ear number per square meter and grain rows per ear. Also priming with tap water caused to increase 100 grains weight of corn meanwhile in first planting date priming with tap water and urea solution had more grain number per ear. Priming with zinc in the first planting date increased harvest index. Generally it is concluded that farmers by seed priming especially with tap water and zinc solution could plant corn earlier to increase growth season also if planting is delayed priming with tap water can compensate yield loss.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc priming at the first planting date increased emergence rate by 30%.

Material
S.C. 260t0
Treatment
zinc solutione0
Outcome
rate of emergencee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
30%e0
Qualifier
first planting datee0
Comparator
no primede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the first planting date using zinc solution increased rate of emergence as well 30%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–654 · show in text ↑
e1

“and no primed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–547 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn cultivar (S.C. 260)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc priming at the first planting date increased emergence percentage by 10%.

Material
S.C. 260t0
Treatment
zinc solutione0
Outcome
E mergence percente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10%e0
Qualifier
first planting datee0
Comparator
no primede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“E mergence percent was increased in the first planting date with using zinc solution by10%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–745 · show in text ↑
e1

“and no primed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–547 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn cultivar (S.C. 260)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea priming at the second and third planting dates increased emergence percentage by 13%.

Material
S.C. 260t0
Treatment
urea solutione0
Outcome
E mergence percente1
Direction
increasede1
Value
13%e0
Qualifier
second and third planting datese0
Comparator
no primede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the second and third planting dates with using urea solution by 13%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–821 · show in text ↑
e1

“E mergence percent was increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–687 · show in text ↑
e2

“and no primed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–547 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn cultivar (S.C. 260)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tap-water priming produced the maximum grain yield at all planting dates versus unprimed seed.

Material
S.C. 260t0
Treatment
priming with tap watere0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Qualifier
in all planting datese0
Comparator
no primed treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in all planting dates priming with tap water produced maximum grain yield compared to no primed treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–936 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn cultivar (S.C. 260)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed priming increased ears per square meter and grain rows per ear.

Material
S.C. 260t0
Treatment
seed priminge0
Outcome
ear number per square meter and grain rows per eare0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
no primede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed priming increased the ear number per square meter and grain rows per ear.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1034 · show in text ↑
e1

“and no primed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–547 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn cultivar (S.C. 260)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tap-water priming increased 100-grain weight.

Material
S.C. 260t0
Treatment
priming with tap watere0
Outcome
100 grains weighte0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
no primede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“priming with tap water caused to increase 100 grains weight of corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1107 · show in text ↑
e1

“and no primed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–547 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn cultivar (S.C. 260)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tap-water priming at the first planting date gave more grains per ear.

Material
S.C. 260t0
Treatment
priming with tap watere0
Outcome
grain number per eare0
Direction
moree0
Qualifier
first planting datee0
Comparator
no primede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in first planting date priming with tap water and urea solution had more grain number per ear.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1212 · show in text ↑
e1

“and no primed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–547 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn cultivar (S.C. 260)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea priming at the first planting date gave more grains per ear.

Material
S.C. 260t0
Treatment
urea solutione0
Outcome
grain number per eare0
Direction
moree0
Qualifier
first planting datee0
Comparator
no primede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in first planting date priming with tap water and urea solution had more grain number per ear.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1212 · show in text ↑
e1

“and no primed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–547 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn cultivar (S.C. 260)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc priming at the first planting date increased harvest index.

Material
S.C. 260t0
Treatment
Priming with zince0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
first planting datee0
Comparator
no primede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Priming with zinc in the first planting date increased harvest index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1282 · show in text ↑
e1

“and no primed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–547 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn cultivar (S.C. 260)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–140 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest priming with tap water and zinc to permit earlier corn planting and a longer growing season.

Outcome
plant corn earlier to increase growth seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“farmers by seed priming especially with tap water and zinc solution could plant corn earlier to increase growth season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1432 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest tap-water priming can compensate for yield loss when planting is delayed.

Outcome
priming with tap water can compensate yield losse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“if planting is delayed priming with tap water can compensate yield loss.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1438–1510 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant corn earlier”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1388–1406 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

224 papers: 183 positive, 41 negative or no effect

182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

220 papers more in this group

See all 224 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

441 papers: 391 positive, 50 negative or no effect

390 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

437 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

165 papers: 150 positive, 15 negative or no effect

149 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

161 papers more in this group

See all 165 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.