Paper · 1989 · Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

To till or not to till during drought

Elbert E. Dickey; Donald J. Eckert; William E. Larson; et al.

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

▄ Dickey : Generally, no-till did well. The worst situations were in conventionally tilled fields. Of 10 side-by-side tillage system comparisons, only one site had a higher yield with conventional tillage, by two bushels on soybeans. Yields from seed corn variety trials on dryland were higher with no-till than with conventional (chisel plow) tillage. Results from farmers were mixed. Some thought no-till had higher yields while others indicated that yields from no-till were less than expected. Overall, no-till showed a slight advantage in 1988, partly because Nebraska farmers are used to working with less rainfall than producers in other states. ▄ Eckert : Most properly executed conservation tillage systems performed in 1988 as they normally would, despite the extremely dry weather. On well-drained soils, no-till produced higher yields than moldboard plowing, as is the normal case, even though early growth was much slower. On more poorly drained soils, no-till yields were comparable to conventional tillage yields if adequate residue was present, proper rotation was practiced, and the field had a history of improved drainage to promote acceptable soil structure for root development. ▄ Larson : Given the high variability in corn and soybean …

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage produced higher soybean yield at only one of ten sites, by two bushels.

Taxon
soybeansGlycine maxe0
Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
two bushelse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Of 10 side-by-side tillage system comparisons, only one site had a higher yield with conventional tillage, by two bushels on soybeans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 99–232 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dryland seed corn variety trials yielded more under no-till than chisel plow tillage.

Treatment
no-tille0
Outcome
Yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
conventional (chisel plow) tillagee0
Setting
drylande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields from seed corn variety trials on dryland were higher with no-till than with conventional (chisel plow) tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–351 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmer reports of no-till yields were mixed.

Outcome
yieldse0
Qualifier
mixede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results from farmers were mixed. Some thought no-till had higher yields while others indicated that yields from no-till were less than expected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–496 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn and soybean …”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1259 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till had a slight overall advantage in 1988.

Outcome
slight advantagee0
Direction
advantagee0
Qualifier
1988e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, no-till showed a slight advantage in 1988”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–548 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn and soybean …”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till produced higher yields than moldboard plowing on well-drained soils.

Treatment
no-tille0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
well-drained soilse0
Comparator
moldboard plowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On well-drained soils, no-till produced higher yields than moldboard plowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–869 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn and soybean …”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till slowed early growth on well-drained soils.

Treatment
no-tille0
Outcome
early growthe0
Direction
slowere0
Qualifier
well-drained soilse0
Comparator
moldboard plowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On well-drained soils, no-till produced higher yields than moldboard plowing, as is the normal case, even though early growth was much slower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–934 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn and soybean …”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On poorly drained soils, no-till and conventional tillage yields were comparable under specified management conditions.

Treatment
no-tille0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
comparablee0
Qualifier
if adequate residue was present, proper rotation was practiced, and the field had a history of improved drainagee0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On more poorly drained soils, no-till yields were comparable to conventional tillage yields if adequate residue was present, proper rotation was practiced, and the field had a history of improved drainage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1140 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn and soybean …”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1259 · show in text ↑

tillage · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

84 papers: 52 positive, 32 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

80 papers more in this group

See all 84 papers →

tillage · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 196 positive, 87 negative or no effect

86 papers in the same direction as this paper · 196 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

279 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

390 papers: 264 positive, 126 negative or no effect

263 papers in the same direction as this paper · 100 in the opposite direction · 26 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

386 papers more in this group

See all 390 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.