Paper · 2016 · Tropical Agriculture

Compatibility of fungicides with pre-storage dry and mid-storage wet physiological seed treatments for storability and field performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).

B. K. De; Arnab Mandal; Raktima Basu

18
claims
37
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Pre-storage dry physiological treatment of harvest fresh (high-vigour) wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cv. Sonalika seed with finely powdered aspro (active ingredient (ai) ortho-acetylsalicylic acid 56.5% @ 100 mg kg-1 of seed], ibucon (ai, ibuprofen, 28.57%; and paracetamol, 71.42% @ 100 mg kg-1 of seed), and common bleaching powder (ai, calcium hypochlorite, 50% @ 2 g kg-1 of seed) showed significant improvement on vigour and viability over the untreated control after natural aging under ambient conditions (relative humidity, 81 ± 1.9% and temperature, 29.6 ± 0.3°C). Finely powdered dry red chilli (Capsicum frutescens L.) fruit @ 1 g kg-1 of seed and trigonella (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) seed powder @ 1 g kg-1 of seed also improved storability over the untreated control. Mid-storage soaking-drying treatment with water, which was included for the comparison with the pre-storage dry treatments, was equally effective in reducing seed deterioration and improving post-storage germinability. Dry-dressing with the fungicides showed their compatibility with the physiological wet and dry treatments. None of them reduced the beneficial effects of vigour and viability, maintaining physiological treatments. The field performance and productivity of the crop raised from seeds of the physiological (pre-storage) and wet (mid-storage) treatments were consistently superior to the untreated control. The final emergence of seedlings in the field (plant population) was significantly improved by aspro and captan. All the physiological treatments showed greater numbers of effective (ear-bearing) tillers than the control, while amongst the fungicides, such improvements were shown by captan and bavistin. Regarding grain yield, all the physiological treatments except trigonella seed powder improved yield per unit area, but the overall effect of the fungicides was not significant; however, none of them showed any negative interaction with the physiological treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Finely powdered aspro significantly improved wheat seed vigour and viability over the untreated control after natural aging.

Treatment
finely powdered asproe0
Outcome
vigour and viabilitye0
Direction
significant improvemente0
Comparator
untreated controle0
Setting
natural aging under ambient conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–168 · show in text ↑
e0

“finely powdered aspro (active ingredient (ai) ortho-acetylsalicylic acid 56.5% @ 100 mg kg-1 of seed], ibucon (ai, ibuprofen, 28.57%; and paracetamol, 71.42% @ 100 mg kg-1 of seed), and common bleaching powder (ai, calcium hypochlorite, 50% @ 2 g kg-1 of seed) showed significant improvement on vigour and viability over the untreated control after natural aging under ambient conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–510 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ibucon significantly improved wheat seed vigour and viability over the untreated control after natural aging.

Treatment
ibucone0
Outcome
vigour and viabilitye0
Direction
significant improvemente0
Comparator
untreated controle0
Setting
natural aging under ambient conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–168 · show in text ↑
e0

“finely powdered aspro (active ingredient (ai) ortho-acetylsalicylic acid 56.5% @ 100 mg kg-1 of seed], ibucon (ai, ibuprofen, 28.57%; and paracetamol, 71.42% @ 100 mg kg-1 of seed), and common bleaching powder (ai, calcium hypochlorite, 50% @ 2 g kg-1 of seed) showed significant improvement on vigour and viability over the untreated control after natural aging under ambient conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–510 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Common bleaching powder significantly improved wheat seed vigour and viability over the untreated control after natural aging.

Treatment
common bleaching powdere0
Outcome
vigour and viabilitye0
Direction
significant improvemente0
Comparator
untreated controle0
Setting
natural aging under ambient conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–168 · show in text ↑
e0

“finely powdered aspro (active ingredient (ai) ortho-acetylsalicylic acid 56.5% @ 100 mg kg-1 of seed], ibucon (ai, ibuprofen, 28.57%; and paracetamol, 71.42% @ 100 mg kg-1 of seed), and common bleaching powder (ai, calcium hypochlorite, 50% @ 2 g kg-1 of seed) showed significant improvement on vigour and viability over the untreated control after natural aging under ambient conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–510 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Finely powdered dry red chilli fruit improved wheat seed storability over the untreated control.

Treatment
Finely powdered dry red chilli (Capsicum frutescens L.) fruit @ 1 g kg-1 of seede1
Outcome
storabilitye1
Direction
improvede1
Comparator
untreated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–168 · show in text ↑
e1

“Finely powdered dry red chilli (Capsicum frutescens L.) fruit @ 1 g kg-1 of seed and trigonella (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) seed powder @ 1 g kg-1 of seed also improved storability over the untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–783 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trigonella seed powder improved wheat seed storability over the untreated control.

Treatment
trigonella (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) seed powder @ 1 g kg-1 of seede1
Outcome
storabilitye1
Direction
improvede1
Comparator
untreated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–168 · show in text ↑
e1

“Finely powdered dry red chilli (Capsicum frutescens L.) fruit @ 1 g kg-1 of seed and trigonella (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) seed powder @ 1 g kg-1 of seed also improved storability over the untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–783 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mid-storage soaking-drying with water was equally effective as the pre-storage dry treatments in reducing wheat seed deterioration.

Treatment
Mid-storage soaking-drying treatment with watere2
Outcome
seed deterioratione2
Direction
reducinge2
Comparator
pre-storage dry treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–168 · show in text ↑
e2

“Mid-storage soaking-drying treatment with water, which was included for the comparison with the pre-storage dry treatments, was equally effective in reducing seed deterioration and improving post-storage germinability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–1002 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mid-storage soaking-drying with water was equally effective as the pre-storage dry treatments in improving wheat post-storage germinability.

Treatment
Mid-storage soaking-drying treatment with watere2
Outcome
post-storage germinabilitye2
Direction
improvinge2
Comparator
pre-storage dry treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–168 · show in text ↑
e2

“Mid-storage soaking-drying treatment with water, which was included for the comparison with the pre-storage dry treatments, was equally effective in reducing seed deterioration and improving post-storage germinability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–1002 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry-dressing with the fungicides was compatible with the physiological wet and dry seed treatments in wheat.

Treatment
Dry-dressing with the fungicidese3
Outcome
compatibilitye3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–168 · show in text ↑
e3

“Dry-dressing with the fungicides showed their compatibility with the physiological wet and dry treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

None of the fungicides reduced the beneficial vigour and viability effects of the physiological seed treatments in wheat.

Treatment
Dry-dressing with the fungicidese3
Outcome
beneficial effects of vigour and viabilitye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–168 · show in text ↑
e3

“Dry-dressing with the fungicides showed their compatibility with the physiological wet and dry treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1109 · show in text ↑
e4

“None of them reduced the beneficial effects of vigour and viability, maintaining physiological treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1216 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field performance and productivity of wheat raised from seeds of the physiological and wet treatments were consistently superior to the untreated control.

Treatment
physiological (pre-storage) and wet (mid-storage) treatmentse5
Outcome
field performance and productivitye5
Direction
superiore5
Comparator
untreated controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–168 · show in text ↑
e5

“The field performance and productivity of the crop raised from seeds of the physiological (pre-storage) and wet (mid-storage) treatments were consistently superior to the untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1406 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aspro significantly improved final seedling emergence of wheat in the field.

Treatment
asproe6
Outcome
final emergence of seedlings in the field (plant population)e6
Direction
significantly improvede6
Setting
in the fielde6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–168 · show in text ↑
e6

“The final emergence of seedlings in the field (plant population) was significantly improved by aspro and captan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1519 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Captan significantly improved final seedling emergence of wheat in the field.

Treatment
captane6
Outcome
final emergence of seedlings in the field (plant population)e6
Direction
significantly improvede6
Setting
in the fielde6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–168 · show in text ↑
e6

“The final emergence of seedlings in the field (plant population) was significantly improved by aspro and captan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1519 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All physiological seed treatments gave wheat more effective (ear-bearing) tillers than the control.

Treatment
physiological treatmentse7
Outcome
numbers of effective (ear-bearing) tillerse7
Direction
greatere7
Comparator
the controle7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–168 · show in text ↑
e7

“All the physiological treatments showed greater numbers of effective (ear-bearing) tillers than the control, while amongst the fungicides, such improvements were shown by captan and bavistin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1711 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Captan improved the number of effective (ear-bearing) tillers of wheat compared with the control.

Treatment
captane7
Outcome
effective (ear-bearing) tillerse7
Direction
improvementse7
Comparator
the controle7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–168 · show in text ↑
e7

“All the physiological treatments showed greater numbers of effective (ear-bearing) tillers than the control, while amongst the fungicides, such improvements were shown by captan and bavistin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1711 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bavistin improved the number of effective (ear-bearing) tillers of wheat compared with the control.

Treatment
bavistine7
Outcome
effective (ear-bearing) tillerse7
Direction
improvementse7
Comparator
the controle7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–168 · show in text ↑
e7

“All the physiological treatments showed greater numbers of effective (ear-bearing) tillers than the control, while amongst the fungicides, such improvements were shown by captan and bavistin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1711 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All physiological seed treatments except trigonella seed powder improved wheat yield per unit area.

Treatment
all the physiological treatments except trigonella seed powdere1
Outcome
yield per unit areae1
Direction
improvede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–168 · show in text ↑
e1

“Regarding grain yield, all the physiological treatments except trigonella seed powder improved yield per unit area, but the overall effect of the fungicides was not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1713–1889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The overall effect of the fungicides on wheat grain yield was not significant.

Treatment
fungicidese1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–168 · show in text ↑
e1

“Regarding grain yield, all the physiological treatments except trigonella seed powder improved yield per unit area, but the overall effect of the fungicides was not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1713–1889 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

None of the fungicides showed a negative interaction with the physiological seed treatments in wheat.

Outcome
negative interactione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–168 · show in text ↑
e1

“none of them showed any negative interaction with the physiological treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1900–1978 · show in text ↑

carbendazim · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

captan · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · quality: postharvest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

botanical · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

140 papers: 123 positive, 17 negative or no effect

122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

136 papers more in this group

See all 140 papers →

fungicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 232 positive, 30 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 232 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

application · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

307 papers: 273 positive, 34 negative or no effect

272 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

303 papers more in this group

See all 307 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.