Paper · 2012 · Annals of biological research

Effects of Bio and Chemical Nitrogen Fertilizer on Grain and Oil Yield of Sunflower(Helianthus annuus L.) under Different Rates of Plant Density

Ali Namvar; Teymur Kh;  An; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
25
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Considering the environmental problems arising from chemical fertilizers usage, many attentions has been drawn to the application of biological fertilizers in agriculture. In order to study the effects of chemical nitrogen fertilization and biofertilizer inoculation on grain yield, yield components and oil yield of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) under different rates of plant density, a Factorial experiment based on Randomized Complete Block design was conducted in three replications. Experimental factors were: (i). Four levels of chemical nitrogen fertilizer (0, 100, 150 and 200 kg N ha-1), (ii). Two levels of biofertilizer (with and without inoculation) containing of Azotobacter sp. and Azospirillum sp. and (iii). Three levels of plant density (8, 10 and 12 plant m-2). The highest plant height, stem and head diameter, number of grains per head, 1000-grains weight, grain yield, oil yield and biological yield were obtained from the highest level of nitrogen fertilizer (200 kg N ha-1) and biofertilizer inoculation. Application of 150 and 200 kg N ha-1 showed no significant difference in these traits. Furthermore, the highest rate of plant density (12 plant m-2) showed the maximum values of grain yield, oil yield and biological yield that was statistically in par with 10 plant m-2 density. The results pointed out that medium plant density (about 10 plant m-2) with moderate N rate (about 150 kg N ha-1) can be beneficial to improve growth, development and total yield of inoculated sunflower.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest nitrogen rate and inoculation gave the highest growth traits.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse1
Treatment
highest level of nitrogen fertilizer (200 kg N ha-1) and biofertilizer inoculatione0
Outcome
plant height, stem and head diametere0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest plant height, stem and head diameter, number of grains per head, 1000-grains weight, grain yield, oil yield and biological yield were obtained from the highest level of nitrogen fertilizer (200 kg N ha-1) and biofertilizer inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–1031 · show in text ↑
e1

“sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–349 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest nitrogen rate and inoculation gave the highest grain count and weight.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse1
Treatment
highest level of nitrogen fertilizer (200 kg N ha-1) and biofertilizer inoculatione0
Outcome
number of grains per head, 1000-grains weighte0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest plant height, stem and head diameter, number of grains per head, 1000-grains weight, grain yield, oil yield and biological yield were obtained from the highest level of nitrogen fertilizer (200 kg N ha-1) and biofertilizer inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–1031 · show in text ↑
e1

“sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–349 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest nitrogen rate and inoculation gave the highest yields.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse1
Treatment
highest level of nitrogen fertilizer (200 kg N ha-1) and biofertilizer inoculatione0
Outcome
grain yield, oil yield and biological yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest plant height, stem and head diameter, number of grains per head, 1000-grains weight, grain yield, oil yield and biological yield were obtained from the highest level of nitrogen fertilizer (200 kg N ha-1) and biofertilizer inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–1031 · show in text ↑
e1

“sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–349 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 150 and 200 kg N ha-1 rates did not differ significantly across listed traits.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse2
Treatment
150e0
Outcome
these traitse0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
200 kg N ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 150 and 200 kg N ha-1 showed no significant difference in these traits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1118 · show in text ↑
e1

“1000-grains weight, grain yield, oil yield and biological yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–924 · show in text ↑
e2

“sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–349 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest density gave maximum yields, statistically comparable to 10 plant m-2.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse1
Treatment
12 plant m-2e0
Outcome
grain yield, oil yield and biological yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
10 plant m-2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest rate of plant density (12 plant m-2) showed the maximum values of grain yield, oil yield and biological yield that was statistically in par with 10 plant m-2 density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1310 · show in text ↑
e1

“sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–349 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend medium density and moderate nitrogen for inoculated sunflower.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
inoculatede0
Outcome
medium plant density (about 10 plant m-2) with moderate N rate (about 150 kg N ha-1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“medium plant density (about 10 plant m-2) with moderate N rate (about 150 kg N ha-1) can be beneficial to improve growth, development and total yield of inoculated sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1513 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: oil · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results differ

51 papers: 40 positive, 11 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

fertilization · quality: oil · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results differ

89 papers: 76 positive, 13 negative or no effect

75 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

inoculation · quality: oil · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

inoculation · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 48 positive, 7 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

196 papers: 182 positive, 14 negative or no effect

181 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

192 papers more in this group

See all 196 papers →

fertilization · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

365 papers: 344 positive, 21 negative or no effect

343 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

361 papers more in this group

See all 365 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.