Paper · 2017 · Legume Research - An International Journal

Effect of liming, planting time and tillage on system productivity, resource use efficiency and energy dynamics of rice (Oryza sativa) - lathyrus (Lathyrus sativus) cropping system under rainfed lowland condition of North East India

Sakhen Sorokhaibam; N. Anando Singh; L. Nabachandra

12
claims
19
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Imphal, Manipur during 2010-12 to study the effect of liming, planting time and tillage on system productivity, resource use efficiency and energy dynamics of rice (Oryza sativa L.) - lathyrus (Lathyrus sativus L.) cropping system. The experiment was laid out in split plot design with 3 replications. The treatment consisted of two factors i.e. liming (liming and no liming) and planting time (early and normal) given to rice crop during kharif season in the main plots and two tillage practices (no tillage and conventional tillage) were given in the succeeding lathyrus crop during the rabi season in the sub plots. Results showed that application of lime @ 500 kg CaCO3/ha before planting rice improved system productivity marginally in terms of rice-equivalent yield (REY of 6.32 t/ha) and water use efficiency (WUE) of the system (20.51 kg/ha-mm), however, it failed to increase benefit: cost (B: C) ratio. Advancing planting time of rice 15 days ahead of normal planting enhanced growth and yield of succeeding lathyrus crop resulting in increase of REY, land use efficiency (LUE), production efficiency (PE), and partial factor productivity (PFP) of the system by 19.3, 1.7, 17.0 and 17.0 %, respectively and moreover, it recorded higher system B:C ratio (1.20). No tillage enhanced PFP, NUE, WUE and B: C ratio of the system, while conventional tillage increased energy consumption by 9.45 %.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming before rice marginally improved rice-equivalent yield relative to no liming.

Treatment
application of lime @ 500 kg CaCO3/hae1
Outcome
rice-equivalent yielde1
Direction
improvede1
Value
6.32 t/hae1
Qualifier
marginallye1
Comparator
no liminge0
Setting
Imphal, Manipure4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment consisted of two factors i.e. liming (liming and no liming) and planting time (early and normal)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–448 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results showed that application of lime @ 500 kg CaCO3/ha before planting rice improved system productivity marginally in terms of rice-equivalent yield (REY of 6.32 t/ha) and water use efficiency (WUE) of the system (20.51 kg/ha-mm), however, it failed to increase benefit: cost (B: C) ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–947 · show in text ↑
e4

“A field experiment was conducted at Imphal, Manipur during 2010-12”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming before rice improved water use efficiency of the system relative to no liming.

Treatment
application of lime @ 500 kg CaCO3/hae1
Outcome
water use efficiency (WUE) of the systeme1
Direction
improvede1
Value
20.51 kg/ha-mme1
Comparator
no liminge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment consisted of two factors i.e. liming (liming and no liming) and planting time (early and normal)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–448 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results showed that application of lime @ 500 kg CaCO3/ha before planting rice improved system productivity marginally in terms of rice-equivalent yield (REY of 6.32 t/ha) and water use efficiency (WUE) of the system (20.51 kg/ha-mm), however, it failed to increase benefit: cost (B: C) ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–947 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming before rice failed to increase the benefit: cost ratio relative to no liming.

Treatment
application of lime @ 500 kg CaCO3/hae1
Outcome
benefit: cost (B: C) ratioe1
Direction
failed to increasee1
Comparator
no liminge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment consisted of two factors i.e. liming (liming and no liming) and planting time (early and normal)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–448 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results showed that application of lime @ 500 kg CaCO3/ha before planting rice improved system productivity marginally in terms of rice-equivalent yield (REY of 6.32 t/ha) and water use efficiency (WUE) of the system (20.51 kg/ha-mm), however, it failed to increase benefit: cost (B: C) ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–947 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Advancing rice planting 15 days increased rice-equivalent yield relative to normal planting.

Treatment
Advancing planting time of rice 15 days ahead of normal plantinge2
Outcome
REYe2
Direction
increasee2
Value
19.3e2
Comparator
normal plantinge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Advancing planting time of rice 15 days ahead of normal planting enhanced growth and yield of succeeding lathyrus crop resulting in increase of REY, land use efficiency (LUE), production efficiency (PE), and partial factor productivity (PFP) of the system by 19.3, 1.7, 17.0 and 17.0 %, respectively and moreover, it recorded higher system B:C ratio (1.20)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1305 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Advancing rice planting 15 days increased land use efficiency of the system relative to normal planting.

Treatment
Advancing planting time of rice 15 days ahead of normal plantinge2
Outcome
land use efficiency (LUE)e2
Direction
increasee2
Value
1.7e2
Comparator
normal plantinge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Advancing planting time of rice 15 days ahead of normal planting enhanced growth and yield of succeeding lathyrus crop resulting in increase of REY, land use efficiency (LUE), production efficiency (PE), and partial factor productivity (PFP) of the system by 19.3, 1.7, 17.0 and 17.0 %, respectively and moreover, it recorded higher system B:C ratio (1.20)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1305 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Advancing rice planting 15 days increased production efficiency of the system relative to normal planting.

Treatment
Advancing planting time of rice 15 days ahead of normal plantinge2
Outcome
production efficiency (PE)e2
Direction
increasee2
Value
17.0e2
Comparator
normal plantinge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Advancing planting time of rice 15 days ahead of normal planting enhanced growth and yield of succeeding lathyrus crop resulting in increase of REY, land use efficiency (LUE), production efficiency (PE), and partial factor productivity (PFP) of the system by 19.3, 1.7, 17.0 and 17.0 %, respectively and moreover, it recorded higher system B:C ratio (1.20)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1305 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Advancing rice planting 15 days increased partial factor productivity of the system relative to normal planting.

Treatment
Advancing planting time of rice 15 days ahead of normal plantinge2
Outcome
partial factor productivity (PFP)e2
Direction
increasee2
Value
17.0e2
Comparator
normal plantinge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Advancing planting time of rice 15 days ahead of normal planting enhanced growth and yield of succeeding lathyrus crop resulting in increase of REY, land use efficiency (LUE), production efficiency (PE), and partial factor productivity (PFP) of the system by 19.3, 1.7, 17.0 and 17.0 %, respectively and moreover, it recorded higher system B:C ratio (1.20)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1305 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Advancing rice planting 15 days gave a higher system B:C ratio of 1.20 relative to normal planting.

Treatment
Advancing planting time of rice 15 days ahead of normal plantinge2
Outcome
system B:C ratioe2
Direction
highere2
Value
1.20e2
Comparator
normal plantinge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Advancing planting time of rice 15 days ahead of normal planting enhanced growth and yield of succeeding lathyrus crop resulting in increase of REY, land use efficiency (LUE), production efficiency (PE), and partial factor productivity (PFP) of the system by 19.3, 1.7, 17.0 and 17.0 %, respectively and moreover, it recorded higher system B:C ratio (1.20)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1305 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage enhanced partial factor productivity, nutrient use efficiency and water use efficiency of the system relative to conventional tillage.

Treatment
No tillagee3
Outcome
PFP, NUE, WUEe3
Direction
enhancede3
Comparator
conventional tillagee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results showed that application of lime @ 500 kg CaCO3/ha before planting rice improved system productivity marginally in terms of rice-equivalent yield (REY of 6.32 t/ha) and water use efficiency (WUE) of the system (20.51 kg/ha-mm), however, it failed to increase benefit: cost (B: C) ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–947 · show in text ↑
e3

“No tillage enhanced PFP, NUE, WUE and B: C ratio of the system, while conventional tillage increased energy consumption by 9.45 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1436 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage enhanced the benefit: cost ratio of the system relative to conventional tillage.

Treatment
No tillagee3
Outcome
B: C ratioe3
Direction
enhancede3
Comparator
conventional tillagee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results showed that application of lime @ 500 kg CaCO3/ha before planting rice improved system productivity marginally in terms of rice-equivalent yield (REY of 6.32 t/ha) and water use efficiency (WUE) of the system (20.51 kg/ha-mm), however, it failed to increase benefit: cost (B: C) ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–947 · show in text ↑
e3

“No tillage enhanced PFP, NUE, WUE and B: C ratio of the system, while conventional tillage increased energy consumption by 9.45 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1436 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage increased energy consumption by 9.45% relative to no tillage.

Treatment
conventional tillagee3
Outcome
energy consumptione3
Direction
increasede3
Value
9.45 %e3
Comparator
No tillagee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results showed that application of lime @ 500 kg CaCO3/ha before planting rice improved system productivity marginally in terms of rice-equivalent yield (REY of 6.32 t/ha) and water use efficiency (WUE) of the system (20.51 kg/ha-mm), however, it failed to increase benefit: cost (B: C) ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–947 · show in text ↑
e3

“No tillage enhanced PFP, NUE, WUE and B: C ratio of the system, while conventional tillage increased energy consumption by 9.45 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1436 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Advancing rice planting 15 days enhanced growth and yield of the succeeding lathyrus crop relative to normal planting.

Taxon
lathyrusLathyruse2
Treatment
Advancing planting time of rice 15 days ahead of normal plantinge2
Outcome
growth and yielde2
Direction
enhancede2
Comparator
normal plantinge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus
Lathyrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sannse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Advancing planting time of rice 15 days ahead of normal planting enhanced growth and yield of succeeding lathyrus crop resulting in increase of REY, land use efficiency (LUE), production efficiency (PE), and partial factor productivity (PFP) of the system by 19.3, 1.7, 17.0 and 17.0 %, respectively and moreover, it recorded higher system B:C ratio (1.20)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1305 · show in text ↑

calcium carbonate · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

lime · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

136 papers: 123 positive, 13 negative or no effect

122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

132 papers more in this group

See all 136 papers →

tillage · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 20 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

sowing time · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

193 papers: 123 positive, 70 negative or no effect

122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 68 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

189 papers more in this group

See all 193 papers →

tillage · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

729 papers: 587 positive, 142 negative or no effect

586 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 27 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

725 papers more in this group

See all 729 papers →

lime · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

sowing time · yield · LathyrusResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.