Paper · 1983 · Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences , University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar

CONSUMPTIVE USE OF WATER FOR WHEAT IN PESHAWAR VALLEY

Abdul Hamid; Ruhul Amin; Shahid Ahmad; et al.

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Consumptive use of water data for wheat crop in Peshawar valley is needed to improve management practices, irrigation scheduling and water resources planning. The data are also needed to evaluate the moisture stress and fertilizer use especially due to scarcity of irrigation water during Rabi season. Therefore, a research study was initiated during 1977-78 at Agricultural University Farm Peshawar which continued for three (3) consecutive years in order to have reliable estimates. The experimental site was located on deep clay loam soil and belonged to Peshawar series. Three moisture stress levels of 50, 75 and 90% soil moisture depletion in the top 0— 30 cm soil depth and two fertilizer levels of 56-28— 34 and 168-84-34 (NPK) kg/ha were employed in 3 x 2 randomized complete block design with 4 replications. Improved and recommended wheat varieties were grown during the period of investigations. The results indicated that the amount of water used by the crop during growing season can be reduced without any significant reduction in yield. The average Consumptive use of water values for the three moisture stress levels were computed to be 477, 448 and 365 mm of water. The moisture stress yield functions data indicated that the optimum yield of wheat grain of 2349 Kg/ha was obtained when the crop was irrigated at 75% soil moisture depletion level under properly fertilized conditions. The water use efficiency was increased by 23% with the increase of moisture stress. The highest water use efficiency of 5.9 Kg/mm was obtained when the crop was irrigated at 90% soil moisture depletion.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seasonal water use by wheat could be reduced.

Outcome
amount of water usede0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results indicated that the amount of water used by the crop during growing season can be reduced without any significant reduction in yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1052 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced seasonal water use did not significantly reduce wheat yield.

Treatment
amount of water used by the crop during growing seasone0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
without any significant reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results indicated that the amount of water used by the crop during growing season can be reduced without any significant reduction in yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1052 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average wheat consumptive water use was 477 mm at 50% soil moisture depletion.

Treatment
50e1
Outcome
Consumptive use of watere0
Value
477e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average Consumptive use of water values for the three moisture stress levels were computed to be 477, 448 and 365 mm of water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1183 · show in text ↑
e1

“Three moisture stress levels of 50, 75 and 90% soil moisture depletion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–645 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average wheat consumptive water use was 448 mm at 75% soil moisture depletion.

Treatment
75e1
Outcome
Consumptive use of watere0
Value
448e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average Consumptive use of water values for the three moisture stress levels were computed to be 477, 448 and 365 mm of water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1183 · show in text ↑
e1

“Three moisture stress levels of 50, 75 and 90% soil moisture depletion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–645 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average wheat consumptive water use was 365 mm at 90% soil moisture depletion.

Treatment
90% soil moisture depletione1
Outcome
Consumptive use of watere0
Value
365 mm of watere0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average Consumptive use of water values for the three moisture stress levels were computed to be 477, 448 and 365 mm of water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1183 · show in text ↑
e1

“Three moisture stress levels of 50, 75 and 90% soil moisture depletion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–645 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimum wheat grain yield of 2349 Kg/ha occurred with irrigation at 75% depletion under properly fertilized conditions.

Treatment
irrigated at 75% soil moisture depletion levele0
Outcome
yield of wheat graine0
Direction
optimume0
Value
2349 Kg/hae0
Qualifier
under properly fertilized conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The moisture stress yield functions data indicated that the optimum yield of wheat grain of 2349 Kg/ha was obtained when the crop was irrigated at 75% soil moisture depletion level under properly fertilized conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1402 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat water use efficiency increased by 23% with increased moisture stress.

Treatment
increase of moisture stresse0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
23%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The water use efficiency was increased by 23% with the increase of moisture stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1486 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest wheat water use efficiency, 5.9 Kg/mm, occurred at 90% soil moisture depletion.

Treatment
irrigated at 90% soil moisture depletione0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.9 Kg/mme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest water use efficiency of 5.9 Kg/mm was obtained when the crop was irrigated at 90% soil moisture depletion.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1605 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑

soil water · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

76 papers: 50 positive, 26 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

soil water · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 15 positive, 6 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

206 papers: 60 positive, 146 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 146 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

202 papers more in this group

See all 206 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

303 papers: 253 positive, 50 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

299 papers more in this group

See all 303 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.