Paper · 2017 · CaSA NaRA DSpace (CaSA NaRA)

Accumulation and Use of Nitrogen in Durum Wheat Cultivar Predel as Influence by Fertilization

G. Panayotova; L. Plescuta; Antoniya Stoyanova

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field study was conducted during 2012-2014 to assess the effect of nitrogen fertilization on the N concentration and uptake of durum wheat cultivar Predel. N in rates 0; 80; 120 and 160 kg ha-1 was applied. The results showed that N fertilization increased grain yield with 33.7-60.9 %. The average total dry biomass in maturity was 9.7 t ha-1. At N160P80 the dry biomass was 12.44 t ha-1. The N concentration increased with went up of N rates. At the three rates the N concentration of grain increased with 8; 27 and 45 % to the unfertilized. NP fertilization improved the N concentration. N uptake with grain was in range 52.7 - 116.8 kg ha-1, and upake with straw - 22 to 59 kg ha-1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization increased grain yield by 33.7-60.9%.

Material
Predelt0
Treatment
N fertilizatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
33.7-60.9 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N fertilization increased grain yield with 33.7-60.9 %.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–288 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat Cultivar Predel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean total dry biomass at maturity was 9.7 t ha-1.

Material
Predelt0
Organ / stage
maturitye0
Outcome
total dry biomasse0
Value
9.7 t ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average total dry biomass in maturity was 9.7 t ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–346 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat Cultivar Predel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry biomass at N160P80 was 12.44 t ha-1.

Material
Predelt0
Treatment
N160P80e0
Outcome
dry biomasse0
Value
12.44 t ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At N160P80 the dry biomass was 12.44 t ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–391 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat Cultivar Predel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–63 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N concentration increased as N rates rose.

Material
Predelt0
Treatment
N ratese0
Outcome
N concentratione0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The N concentration increased with went up of N rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–446 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat Cultivar Predel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The first fertilization rate increased grain N concentration by 8% versus unfertilized.

Material
Predelt0
Treatment
three ratese0
Outcome
N concentration of graine0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8e0
Comparator
unfertilizede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the three rates the N concentration of grain increased with 8; 27 and 45 % to the unfertilized.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–545 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat Cultivar Predel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The second fertilization rate increased grain N concentration by 27% versus unfertilized.

Material
Predelt0
Treatment
three ratese0
Outcome
N concentration of graine0
Direction
increasede0
Value
27e0
Comparator
unfertilizede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the three rates the N concentration of grain increased with 8; 27 and 45 % to the unfertilized.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–545 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat Cultivar Predel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The third fertilization rate increased grain N concentration by 45% versus unfertilized.

Material
Predelt0
Treatment
three ratese0
Outcome
N concentration of graine0
Direction
increasede0
Value
45 %e0
Comparator
unfertilizede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the three rates the N concentration of grain increased with 8; 27 and 45 % to the unfertilized.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–545 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat Cultivar Predel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NP fertilization improved N concentration.

Material
Predelt0
Treatment
NP fertilizatione0
Outcome
N concentratione0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NP fertilization improved the N concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–592 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat Cultivar Predel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain N uptake ranged from 52.7 to 116.8 kg ha-1.

Material
Predelt0
Outcome
N uptake with graine0
Value
52.7 - 116.8 kg ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N uptake with grain was in range 52.7 - 116.8 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–646 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat Cultivar Predel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw N uptake ranged from 22 to 59 kg ha-1.

Material
Predelt0
Outcome
upake with strawe0
Value
22 to 59 kg ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“upake with straw - 22 to 59 kg ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–688 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat Cultivar Predel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–63 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Results differ

79 papers: 68 positive, 11 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 14 positive, 6 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

nanoparticle · nutrient: content · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.