Paper · 2017 · Grass and Forage Science

Effects of 5 years of digestate application on biomass production and quality of cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.)

V. Tilvikienė; A. Šlepetienė; Ž. Kadžiulienė

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Anaerobic digestion of biomass produces biogas for combustion and also provides a residual digestate. Although sometimes regarded as a waste product, the nutrient‐rich chemical composition of digestate makes it a potential organic fertilizer for agriculture. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of digestate as a fertilizer on the biomass yield and chemical composition of cocksfoot ( Dactylis glomerata L.). In a 5‐year small‐plot field experiment digestate fertilization treatments supplying 90, 180, 270, 360 and 450 kg N ha −1 were compared with untreated plots and plots fertilized with 180 kg N ha −1 of mineral N fertilizer. Swards fertilized with digestate produced higher biomass yield compared with the control. The same rate of nitrogen fertilizer (180 kg N ha −1 ) supplied as digestate and from mineral fertilizers gave similar results on biomass yield. Herbage in swards fertilized with digestate contained less nitrogen, but the C:N ratio was much more suitable for biogas production. Digestate fertilization resulted in higher concentrations of cellulose and hemicellulose in biomass and lower contents of the inhibitors of anaerobic digestion—sulphur, calcium, magnesium and phosphorus—compared with those of swards receiving mineral fertilizers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Digestate-fertilized swards produced higher biomass yield than the control

Taxon
Dactylis glomerataDactylis glomeratat0
Treatment
digestatee2
Outcome
biomass yielde2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
the controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dactylis glomerata
Dactylis glomerata · TaxonW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“biomass production and quality of cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–114 · show in text ↑
e2

“Swards fertilized with digestate produced higher biomass yield compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–750 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Digestate and mineral nitrogen at the same rate gave similar biomass yield

Taxon
Dactylis glomerataDactylis glomeratat0
Treatment
supplied as digestatee3
Outcome
biomass yielde3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3
Comparator
from mineral fertilizerse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dactylis glomerata
Dactylis glomerata · TaxonW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“biomass production and quality of cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–114 · show in text ↑
e3

“supplied as digestate and from mineral fertilizers gave similar results on biomass yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–895 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbage from digestate-fertilized swards contained less nitrogen

Taxon
Dactylis glomerataDactylis glomeratat0
Organ / stage
Herbagee4
Treatment
digestatee4
Outcome
nitrogene4
Direction
lesse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dactylis glomerata
Dactylis glomerata · TaxonW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“biomass production and quality of cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–114 · show in text ↑
e4

“Herbage in swards fertilized with digestate contained less nitrogen, but the C:N ratio was much more suitable for biogas production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1028 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Digestate fertilization gave a C:N ratio much more suitable for biogas production

Taxon
Dactylis glomerataDactylis glomeratat0
Treatment
digestatee4
Outcome
C:N ratioe4
Direction
much more suitablee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dactylis glomerata
Dactylis glomerata · TaxonW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“biomass production and quality of cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–114 · show in text ↑
e4

“Herbage in swards fertilized with digestate contained less nitrogen, but the C:N ratio was much more suitable for biogas production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1028 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Digestate fertilization increased cellulose and hemicellulose concentrations in biomass

Taxon
Dactylis glomerataDactylis glomeratat0
Treatment
Digestate fertilizatione5
Outcome
concentrations of cellulose and hemicellulosee5
Direction
highere5
Comparator
mineral fertilizerse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dactylis glomerata
Dactylis glomerata · TaxonW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“biomass production and quality of cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–114 · show in text ↑
e5

“Digestate fertilization resulted in higher concentrations of cellulose and hemicellulose in biomass and lower contents of the inhibitors of anaerobic digestion—sulphur, calcium, magnesium and phosphorus—compared with those of swards receiving mineral fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1292 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Digestate fertilization lowered sulphur, calcium and magnesium contents

Taxon
Dactylis glomerataDactylis glomeratat0
Treatment
Digestate fertilizatione5
Outcome
sulphur, calcium, magnesiume5
Direction
lowere5
Comparator
mineral fertilizerse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dactylis glomerata
Dactylis glomerata · TaxonW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“biomass production and quality of cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–114 · show in text ↑
e5

“Digestate fertilization resulted in higher concentrations of cellulose and hemicellulose in biomass and lower contents of the inhibitors of anaerobic digestion—sulphur, calcium, magnesium and phosphorus—compared with those of swards receiving mineral fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1292 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Digestate fertilization lowered phosphorus content

Taxon
Dactylis glomerataDactylis glomeratat0
Treatment
Digestate fertilizatione5
Outcome
phosphoruse5
Direction
lowere5
Comparator
mineral fertilizerse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dactylis glomerata
Dactylis glomerata · TaxonW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“biomass production and quality of cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–114 · show in text ↑
e5

“Digestate fertilization resulted in higher concentrations of cellulose and hemicellulose in biomass and lower contents of the inhibitors of anaerobic digestion—sulphur, calcium, magnesium and phosphorus—compared with those of swards receiving mineral fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1292 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · Dactylis glomerata (cocksfoot)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

fertilization · yield · Dactylis glomerata (cocksfoot)Results agree

25 papers: 25 positive, 0 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.