Paper · 2017 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Low‐molecular‐weight glutenin subunits from the 1U genome of Aegilops umbellulata confer superior dough rheological properties and improve breadmaking quality of bread wheat

Jian Wang; Chang Wang; Shoumin Zhen; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
26
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Wheat-related genomes may carry new glutenin genes with the potential for quality improvement of breadmaking. In this study, we estimated the gluten quality properties of the wheat line CNU609 derived from crossing between Chinese Spring (CS, Triticum aestivum L., 2n = 6x = 42, AABBDD) and the wheat Aegilops umbellulata (2n = 2x = 14, UU) 1U(1B) substitution line, and investigated the function of 1U-encoded low-molecular-weight glutenin subunits (LMW-GS). RESULTS: The main quality parameters of CNU609 were significantly improved due to introgression of the 1U genome, including dough development time, stability time, farinograph quality number, gluten index, loaf size and inner structure. Glutenin analysis showed that CNU609 and CS had the same high-molecular-weight glutenin subunit (HMW-GS) composition, but CNU609 carried eight specific 1U genome-encoded LMW-GS. The introgression of the 1U-encoded LMW-GS led to more and larger protein body formation in the CNU609 endosperm. Two new LMW-m type genes from the 1U genome, designated Glu-U3a and Glu-U3b, were cloned and characterized. Secondary structure prediction implied that both Glu-U3a and Glu-U3b encode subunits with high α-helix and β-strand content that could benefit the formation of superior gluten structure. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that the 1U genome has superior LMW-GS that can be used as new gene resources for wheat gluten quality improvement. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CNU609 showed significant improvement in six dough and loaf quality traits after 1U introgression.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
CNU609e0
Treatment
introgression of the 1U genomee0
Outcome
dough development time, stability time, farinograph quality numbere0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The main quality parameters of CNU609 were significantly improved due to introgression of the 1U genome, including dough development time, stability time, farinograph quality number, gluten index, loaf size and inner structure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–708 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 162–173 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CNU609 and CS had the same HMW-GS composition.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
CNU609e0
Outcome
high-molecular-weight glutenin subunit (HMW-GS) compositione0
Direction
samee0
Comparator
CSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CNU609 and CS had the same high-molecular-weight glutenin subunit (HMW-GS) composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–825 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 162–173 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CNU609 carried eight specific 1U genome-encoded LMW-GS.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
CNU609e0
Outcome
1U genome-encoded LMW-GSe0
Value
eighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CNU609 carried eight specific 1U genome-encoded LMW-GS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–885 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 162–173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Introgression increased number and size of endosperm protein bodies.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
endosperme0
Treatment
introgression of the 1U-encoded LMW-GSe0
Outcome
protein body formatione0
Direction
more and largere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The introgression of the 1U-encoded LMW-GS led to more and larger protein body formation in the CNU609 endosperm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1000 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 162–173 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glu-U3a and Glu-U3b were cloned and characterized.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Gene
Glu-U3a and Glu-U3be0
Outcome
cloned and characterizede0
Value
Twoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two new LMW-m type genes from the 1U genome, designated Glu-U3a and Glu-U3b, were cloned and characterized.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1108 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 162–173 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Predicted Glu-U3a and Glu-U3b subunits have high alpha-helix and beta-strand content.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Gene
Glu-U3a and Glu-U3be0
Outcome
high α-helix and β-strand contente0
Direction
highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Secondary structure prediction implied that both Glu-U3a and Glu-U3b encode subunits with high α-helix and β-strand content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1232 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 162–173 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The 1U genome glutenins were proposed as gene resources for wheat quality improvement.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Gene
LMW-GSe0
Outcome
new gene resources for wheat gluten quality improvemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 1U genome has superior LMW-GS that can be used as new gene resources for wheat gluten quality improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1443 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 162–173 · show in text ↑

transgenic · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.