Abstract
Two field experlments were conducted during 1997/1998 and 1998/1999, at the Experimental Station of the National Research Centre at Shalakan. Kalubia Governorate to study the physiological response of wheal plants to different concentration of atonik ( 0 , 2C ,40 and 60 mgll ) and Pix ( 0 . 50 , 100 and 200 mgll ) as well as their interaction on vegetative growth, yield and its components as well as the content of crude protein and total carbohydrate in produced grains. The data indicated that spraying atonik with different concentrations at all stages led to significant increases in plant height, number of tiller, number of spikes. blades area, leaf area index, dry weight of plant. spike weight and length. 1000· grains weight. grain and straw yield per plant and per fed. VoJhile , spraying pix led to signifICant decreases plant height, both number of tiller, and spikes/plant. leaf area, leaf area index and carbohydrate percentage in grains, Spraying wheat planls with atonik at 60 mgJ1 or pix at 50 mg/l caused the highest values in most of growth characters. Spraying plant with 60 mgllalonik and pix at 100 and 200 mglt attained sfgnificant increases in economic yield and ils components as compared with other treatments. Application of etonik treatments in general had a positive effect in most cases on protein and carbohydrate percentage. atonik at 40 and 60 mgll was more effective. while, the highest value was obtained at 100 mgll pix on crude protein content and 50 mgIJ pix on total carbohydrate content. Interaction between atonik at 40 and 60 mgll and pix at 50 and 100 mgll gave the highest values of growth Characters. Application atonik at 60 mgJI with pix at 200 mgll increased significantly yield and its components as compared with of her treatments, Interaction between atonik 60 mgIJ with pix at 100 mgll and atonik at 20 mgJI with pix at 200 mgll gave the highest values of crude protein and carbohydrate percentage in produced grains. respectively.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 16
Claim · model-written summary
Atonik spraying increased multiple wheat growth and yield traits significantly.
- Taxon
- WHEAT
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- spraying atonike0
- Outcome
- plant height, number of tiller, number of spikese0
- Direction
- increasese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“spraying atonik with different concentrations at all stages led to significant increases in plant height, number of tiller, number of spikes. blades area, leaf area index, dry weight of plant. spike weight and length. 1000· grains weight. grain and straw yield per plant and per fed”
t0“WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Atonik spraying significantly increased wheat blade area, leaf area index and dry weight.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- spraying atonike0
- Outcome
- blades area, leaf area index, dry weight of plante0
- Direction
- increasese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“spraying atonik with different concentrations at all stages led to significant increases in plant height, number of tiller, number of spikes. blades area, leaf area index, dry weight of plant. spike weight and length. 1000· grains weight. grain and straw yield per plant and per fed”
t0“WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Atonik spraying significantly increased wheat spike and grain traits and grain and straw yield.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- spraying atonike0
- Outcome
- spike weight and length. 1000· grains weight. grain and straw yield per plant and per fede0
- Direction
- increasese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“spraying atonik with different concentrations at all stages led to significant increases in plant height, number of tiller, number of spikes. blades area, leaf area index, dry weight of plant. spike weight and length. 1000· grains weight. grain and straw yield per plant and per fed”
t0“WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Pix spraying significantly decreased wheat height, tillers, spikes and leaf area.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- spraying pixe0
- Outcome
- plant height, both number of tiller, and spikes/plant. leaf area, leaf area indexe0
- Direction
- decreasese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“spraying pix led to signifICant decreases plant height, both number of tiller, and spikes/plant. leaf area, leaf area index and carbohydrate percentage in grains”
t0“WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Pix spraying significantly decreased wheat grain carbohydrate percentage.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- spraying pixe0
- Outcome
- carbohydrate percentage in grainse0
- Direction
- decreasese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“spraying pix led to signifICant decreases plant height, both number of tiller, and spikes/plant. leaf area, leaf area index and carbohydrate percentage in grains”
t0“WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Atonik at 60 mgJ1 gave the highest values for most wheat growth traits.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- atonik at 60 mgJ1e0
- Outcome
- growth characterse0
- Direction
- highest valuese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Spraying wheat planls with atonik at 60 mgJ1 or pix at 50 mg/l caused the highest values in most of growth characters”
Claim · model-written summary
Pix at 50 mg/l gave the highest values for most wheat growth traits.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- pix at 50 mg/le0
- Outcome
- growth characterse0
- Direction
- highest valuese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Spraying wheat planls with atonik at 60 mgJ1 or pix at 50 mg/l caused the highest values in most of growth characters”
Claim · model-written summary
Atonik at 60 mgllalonik with Pix at 100 and 200 mglt significantly increased economic yield and its components.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 60 mgllalonik and pix at 100 and 200 mglte0
- Outcome
- economic yield and ils componentse0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Spraying plant with 60 mgllalonik and pix at 100 and 200 mglt attained sfgnificant increases in economic yield and ils components as compared with other treatments”
t0“WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Atonik treatments generally benefited grain protein and carbohydrate percentages.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- etonik treatmentse0
- Outcome
- protein and carbohydrate percentagee0
- Direction
- positive effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of etonik treatments in general had a positive effect in most cases on protein and carbohydrate percentage”
t0“WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Atonik at 40 and 60 mgll was more effective for grain composition.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- atonik at 40 and 60 mglle0
- Outcome
- more effectivee0
- Direction
- more effectivee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“atonik at 40 and 60 mgll was more effective”
t0“WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Pix at 100 mgll gave the highest crude protein content.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 100 mgll pixe0
- Outcome
- crude protein contente0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the highest value was obtained at 100 mgll pix on crude protein content”
t0“WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Pix at 50 mgIJ gave the highest carbohydrate content.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 50 mgIJ pixe0
- Outcome
- total carbohydrate contente0
- Direction
- higheste1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“50 mgIJ pix on total carbohydrate content”
t0“WHEAT”
e1“the highest value was obtained at 100 mgll pix on crude protein content and 50 mgIJ pix on total carbohydrate content”
Claim · model-written summary
Atonik at 40 and 60 mgll with Pix at 50 and 100 mgll gave the highest growth values.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- atonik at 40 and 60 mgll and pix at 50 and 100 mglle0
- Outcome
- growth Characterse0
- Direction
- highest valuese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Interaction between atonik at 40 and 60 mgll and pix at 50 and 100 mgll gave the highest values of growth Characters”
t0“WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Atonik at 60 mgJI with Pix at 200 mgll significantly increased yield and components.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- atonik at 60 mgJI with pix at 200 mglle0
- Outcome
- yield and its componentse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- of her treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application atonik at 60 mgJI with pix at 200 mgll increased significantly yield and its components as compared with of her treatments”
t0“WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Atonik 60 mgIJ with Pix 100 mgll gave the highest grain crude protein percentage.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- atonik 60 mgIJ with pix at 100 mglle0
- Outcome
- crude proteine0
- Direction
- highest valuese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Interaction between atonik 60 mgIJ with pix at 100 mgll and atonik at 20 mgJI with pix at 200 mgll gave the highest values of crude protein and carbohydrate percentage in produced grains. respectively”
t0“WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Atonik 20 mgJI with Pix 200 mgll gave the highest grain carbohydrate percentage.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- atonik at 20 mgJI with pix at 200 mglle0
- Outcome
- carbohydrate percentage in produced grainse0
- Direction
- highest valuese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Interaction between atonik 60 mgIJ with pix at 100 mgll and atonik at 20 mgJI with pix at 200 mgll gave the highest values of crude protein and carbohydrate percentage in produced grains. respectively”
t0“WHEAT”
The same questions in other papers
application · quality: sugar starch · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →application · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
272 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
303 papers more in this group
See all 307 papers →application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
873 papers more in this group
See all 877 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.