Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Organics and Micronutrient Management Practices on Soil Available Nutrient and Yield of Aerobic Rice

B. Sagarika; Y. Ashoka Reddy; V. Sumathi

6
claims
21
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

This investigation was conducted at S.V. Agricultural College, Tirupati, to evaluate the performance of aerobic rice under organics and micronutrients. The experiment was consisted of three organic practices in main plot viz., FYM (farm yard manure), GLM (green leaf manure) and no organics and seven micronutrient management practices in subplots i.e., application of iron and zinc either alone or in combination to the soil or foliage and laid out in slit plot design and replicated thrice with Sravani (NLR-33359) variety. As regards the organics, significantly higher post-harvest soil available N, P, K, Fe and Zn content and yield was noticed with the incorporation of FYM. Among the micronutrient management practices, Foliar application of 0.25% FeSO4 and 0.5% ZnSO4 twice at 20 and 30 DAS has recorded maximum value of post-harvest soil available N, P, K, Fe and Zn content and higher yield compared to rest of the micronutrient management practices tried.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM increased post-harvest soil available N, P and K content of aerobic rice soil compared with no organics.

Taxon
aerobic ricee3
Material
Sravani (NLR-33359)e4
Treatment
FYM (farm yard manure)e2
Outcome
soil available N, P, Ke0
Direction
significantly highere0
Comparator
no organicse2
Setting
S.V. Agricultural College, Tirupatie3

Verbatim

e0

“significantly higher post-harvest soil available N, P, K, Fe and Zn content and yield was noticed with the incorporation of FYM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–678 · show in text ↑
e2

“three organic practices in main plot viz., FYM (farm yard manure), GLM (green leaf manure) and no organics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–290 · show in text ↑
e3

“This investigation was conducted at S.V. Agricultural College, Tirupati, to evaluate the performance of aerobic rice under organics and micronutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–150 · show in text ↑
e4

“replicated thrice with Sravani (NLR-33359) variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–524 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM increased post-harvest soil available Fe and Zn content of aerobic rice soil compared with no organics.

Taxon
aerobic ricee3
Material
Sravani (NLR-33359)e4
Treatment
FYM (farm yard manure)e2
Outcome
Fe and Zn contente0
Direction
significantly highere0
Comparator
no organicse2
Setting
S.V. Agricultural College, Tirupatie3

Verbatim

e0

“significantly higher post-harvest soil available N, P, K, Fe and Zn content and yield was noticed with the incorporation of FYM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–678 · show in text ↑
e2

“three organic practices in main plot viz., FYM (farm yard manure), GLM (green leaf manure) and no organics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–290 · show in text ↑
e3

“This investigation was conducted at S.V. Agricultural College, Tirupati, to evaluate the performance of aerobic rice under organics and micronutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–150 · show in text ↑
e4

“replicated thrice with Sravani (NLR-33359) variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–524 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM increased the yield of aerobic rice compared with no organics.

Taxon
aerobic ricee3
Material
Sravani (NLR-33359)e4
Treatment
FYM (farm yard manure)e2
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
significantly highere0
Comparator
no organicse2
Setting
S.V. Agricultural College, Tirupatie3

Verbatim

e0

“significantly higher post-harvest soil available N, P, K, Fe and Zn content and yield was noticed with the incorporation of FYM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–678 · show in text ↑
e2

“three organic practices in main plot viz., FYM (farm yard manure), GLM (green leaf manure) and no organics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–290 · show in text ↑
e3

“This investigation was conducted at S.V. Agricultural College, Tirupati, to evaluate the performance of aerobic rice under organics and micronutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–150 · show in text ↑
e4

“replicated thrice with Sravani (NLR-33359) variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–524 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar FeSO4 and ZnSO4 gave the maximum post-harvest soil available N, P and K content among micronutrient practices.

Taxon
aerobic ricee3
Material
Sravani (NLR-33359)e4
Treatment
Foliar application of 0.25% FeSO4 and 0.5% ZnSO4 twice at 20 and 30 DASe1
Outcome
soil available N, P, Ke1
Direction
maximum valuee1
Comparator
rest of the micronutrient management practices triede1
Setting
S.V. Agricultural College, Tirupatie3

Verbatim

e1

“Foliar application of 0.25% FeSO4 and 0.5% ZnSO4 twice at 20 and 30 DAS has recorded maximum value of post-harvest soil available N, P, K, Fe and Zn content and higher yield compared to rest of the micronutrient management practices tried”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–964 · show in text ↑
e3

“This investigation was conducted at S.V. Agricultural College, Tirupati, to evaluate the performance of aerobic rice under organics and micronutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–150 · show in text ↑
e4

“replicated thrice with Sravani (NLR-33359) variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–524 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar FeSO4 and ZnSO4 gave the maximum post-harvest soil available Fe and Zn content among micronutrient practices.

Taxon
aerobic ricee3
Material
Sravani (NLR-33359)e4
Treatment
Foliar application of 0.25% FeSO4 and 0.5% ZnSO4 twice at 20 and 30 DASe1
Outcome
Fe and Zn contente1
Direction
maximum valuee1
Comparator
rest of the micronutrient management practices triede1
Setting
S.V. Agricultural College, Tirupatie3

Verbatim

e1

“Foliar application of 0.25% FeSO4 and 0.5% ZnSO4 twice at 20 and 30 DAS has recorded maximum value of post-harvest soil available N, P, K, Fe and Zn content and higher yield compared to rest of the micronutrient management practices tried”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–964 · show in text ↑
e3

“This investigation was conducted at S.V. Agricultural College, Tirupati, to evaluate the performance of aerobic rice under organics and micronutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–150 · show in text ↑
e4

“replicated thrice with Sravani (NLR-33359) variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–524 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar FeSO4 and ZnSO4 gave a higher yield of aerobic rice than the other micronutrient practices.

Taxon
aerobic ricee3
Material
Sravani (NLR-33359)e4
Treatment
Foliar application of 0.25% FeSO4 and 0.5% ZnSO4 twice at 20 and 30 DASe1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
rest of the micronutrient management practices triede1
Setting
S.V. Agricultural College, Tirupatie3

Verbatim

e1

“Foliar application of 0.25% FeSO4 and 0.5% ZnSO4 twice at 20 and 30 DAS has recorded maximum value of post-harvest soil available N, P, K, Fe and Zn content and higher yield compared to rest of the micronutrient management practices tried”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–964 · show in text ↑
e3

“This investigation was conducted at S.V. Agricultural College, Tirupati, to evaluate the performance of aerobic rice under organics and micronutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–150 · show in text ↑
e4

“replicated thrice with Sravani (NLR-33359) variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–524 · show in text ↑

iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

29 papers: 27 positive, 2 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

zinc sulfate · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

145 papers: 144 positive, 1 negative or no effect

143 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

zinc sulfate · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

65 papers: 60 positive, 5 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

222 papers: 212 positive, 10 negative or no effect

211 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

218 papers more in this group

See all 222 papers →

application · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

691 papers: 645 positive, 46 negative or no effect

644 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

687 papers more in this group

See all 691 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

993 papers: 932 positive, 61 negative or no effect

931 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

989 papers more in this group

See all 993 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.