Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Influence of long-term organic nutrient management on soil quality and crop productivity in rice (Oryza sativa)potato (Solanum tuberosum)okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) cropping system under irrigated condition

A.K. PATRA; K.N. MISHRA; L.M. GARNAYAK; et al.

11
claims
26
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A long-term field experiment was conducted during 200607 to 201415 on organic nutrient management in rice (Oryza sativa L.)potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) cropping system under irrigated conditions in the coastal alluvial sandy loam soil having pH 5.8 and organic carbon 0.62% at Bhubaneswar, Odisha. Eight treatments comprising of five organic, two integrated and one inorganic of nutrient management were tested with three replications in randomized block design. Organic sources of nutrient supply reduced the system yield by 7.6 to 9.7% over the inorganic source in the first year. However, the mean system yield of conversion period (first three cropping system cycles) with organic nutrient management comprising of supply of one-third N each through farm yard manure (FYM), green manuring of dhaincha (Sesbania cannabina) or vermicompost and neem (Azadirachta indica) oilcake + Azospirillum or Azotobacter + phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) was on par with inorganic approach. The mean system yield from fourth to ninth cropping system cycles (after conversion period) with organic sources of nutrient supply, i.e. FYM + green manuring or vermicompost + neem oilcake + Azospirillum or Azotobacter + PSB was significantly higher (11.1%) than that of with inorganic source of nutrient supply i.e., 100% NPK + ZnSO @ 25 kg/ha to rice and 100% NPK + gypsum @ 4 110 kg/ha + borax @ 10 kg/ha + ammonium molybdate @ 0.8 kg/ha to both potato and okra. The organic nutrient management package increased the soil organic carbon and available N, P and K at the end of ninth cropping system cycle over the initial and the build-up was maximum in the soil applied with one third N each through FYM, dhaincha/vermicompost and neem oilcake + Azospirillum/Azotobacter + PSB. The microbial population in terms of colony forming units increased in a higher rate in soils with organic nutrient supply system (bacteria 36.5 to 39.4%, fungi 33.0 to 38.2% and actinomycetes 36.0 to 37.3%) compared to the inorganic source of nutrient supply system (bacteria 5.6%, fungi 10.3% and actinomycetes 12.7%) after ninth cropping system cycle over initial status. The microbial biomass carbon of the soils with organic sources of nutrient supply was enhanced considerably (57.7% to 66.8%) over the initial level (98.7 to 107.4 ?g C/g). Application of one-third N each through FYM, green manur- ing of dhaincha and neem oilcake + Azospirillum + PSB to rice followed by similar combination of FYM, vermicompost, neem oilcake + Azotobacter + PSB to both potato and okra was the best organic nutrient manage- ment practice for ricepotatookra cropping system for improving soil health and productivity. However, this sys- tem can be profitable under organic farming only when on-farm generated organic manures are used.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic nutrient sources reduced first-year system yield by 7.6 to 9.7% relative to inorganic sources.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa)potato (Solanum tuberosum)okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
Organic sources of nutrient supplye0
Outcome
system yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
7.6 to 9.7%e0
Comparator
inorganic sourcee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Organic sources of nutrient supply reduced the system yield by 7.6 to 9.7% over the inorganic source in the first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–614 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)potato (Solanum tuberosum)okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During conversion, mean system yield under organic management was on par with the inorganic approach.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa)potato (Solanum tuberosum)okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
organic nutrient managemente0
Outcome
mean system yielde0
Direction
on pare0
Qualifier
first three cropping system cyclese0
Comparator
inorganic approache0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the mean system yield of conversion period (first three cropping system cycles) with organic nutrient management comprising of supply of one-third N each through farm yard manure (FYM), green manuring of dhaincha (Sesbania cannabina) or vermicompost and neem (Azadirachta indica) oilcake + Azospirillum or Azotobacter + phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) was on par with inorganic approach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–1017 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)potato (Solanum tuberosum)okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

After conversion, organic nutrient sources gave 11.1% higher system yield than inorganic sources.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa)potato (Solanum tuberosum)okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
organic sources of nutrient supplye0
Outcome
mean system yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
11.1%e0
Comparator
inorganic source of nutrient supplye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean system yield from fourth to ninth cropping system cycles (after conversion period) with organic sources of nutrient supply, i.e. FYM + green manuring or vermicompost + neem oilcake + Azospirillum or Azotobacter + PSB was significantly higher (11.1%) than that of with inorganic source of nutrient supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1331 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)potato (Solanum tuberosum)okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic nutrient management increased soil organic carbon and available N, P and K after nine cycles.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa)potato (Solanum tuberosum)okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
organic nutrient management packagee0
Outcome
soil organic carbon and available N, P and Ke0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
initiale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The organic nutrient management package increased the soil organic carbon and available N, P and K at the end of ninth cropping system cycle over the initial”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1486–1643 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)potato (Solanum tuberosum)okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–166 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The greatest soil nutrient buildup occurred under the stated combined manure, green manure or vermicompost, oilcake and inoculant treatment.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa)potato (Solanum tuberosum)okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
one third N each through FYM, dhaincha/vermicompost and neem oilcake + Azospirillum/Azotobacter + PSBe0
Outcome
soil organic carbon and available N, P and Ke1
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the build-up was maximum in the soil applied with one third N each through FYM, dhaincha/vermicompost and neem oilcake + Azospirillum/Azotobacter + PSB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1648–1799 · show in text ↑
e1

“soil organic carbon and available N, P and K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1540–1584 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)potato (Solanum tuberosum)okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial colony-forming units rose 36.5 to 39.4% under organic nutrient supply.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa)potato (Solanum tuberosum)okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
organic nutrient supply systeme0
Outcome
bacteriae0
Direction
increasede1
Value
36.5 to 39.4%e0
Comparator
inorganic source of nutrient supply systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soils with organic nutrient supply system (bacteria 36.5 to 39.4%, fungi 33.0 to 38.2% and actinomycetes 36.0 to 37.3%) compared to the inorganic source of nutrient supply system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1889–2067 · show in text ↑
e1

“The microbial population in terms of colony forming units increased in a higher rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1801–1885 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)potato (Solanum tuberosum)okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal colony-forming units rose 33.0 to 38.2% under organic nutrient supply.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa)potato (Solanum tuberosum)okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
organic nutrient supply systeme0
Outcome
fungie0
Direction
increasede1
Value
33.0 to 38.2%e0
Comparator
inorganic source of nutrient supply systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soils with organic nutrient supply system (bacteria 36.5 to 39.4%, fungi 33.0 to 38.2% and actinomycetes 36.0 to 37.3%) compared to the inorganic source of nutrient supply system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1889–2067 · show in text ↑
e1

“The microbial population in terms of colony forming units increased in a higher rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1801–1885 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)potato (Solanum tuberosum)okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Actinomycete colony-forming units rose 36.0 to 37.3% under organic nutrient supply.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa)potato (Solanum tuberosum)okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
organic nutrient supply systeme0
Outcome
actinomycetese0
Direction
increasede1
Value
36.0 to 37.3%e0
Comparator
inorganic source of nutrient supply systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soils with organic nutrient supply system (bacteria 36.5 to 39.4%, fungi 33.0 to 38.2% and actinomycetes 36.0 to 37.3%) compared to the inorganic source of nutrient supply system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1889–2067 · show in text ↑
e1

“The microbial population in terms of colony forming units increased in a higher rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1801–1885 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)potato (Solanum tuberosum)okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic nutrient supply enhanced soil microbial biomass carbon by 57.7% to 66.8%.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa)potato (Solanum tuberosum)okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
organic sources of nutrient supplye0
Outcome
microbial biomass carbone0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
57.7% to 66.8%e0
Comparator
initial levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The microbial biomass carbon of the soils with organic sources of nutrient supply was enhanced considerably (57.7% to 66.8%) over the initial level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2176–2323 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)potato (Solanum tuberosum)okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–166 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend the specified organic nutrient sequence as the best practice for soil health and productivity.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa)potato (Solanum tuberosum)okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)Oryza sativat0
Outcome
best organic nutrient manage- ment practicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of one-third N each through FYM, green manur- ing of dhaincha and neem oilcake + Azospirillum + PSB to rice followed by similar combination of FYM, vermicompost, neem oilcake + Azotobacter + PSB to both potato and okra was the best organic nutrient manage- ment practice for ricepotatookra cropping system for improving soil health and productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2348–2708 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)potato (Solanum tuberosum)okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–166 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors say organic farming profitability requires on-farm generated manures.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa)potato (Solanum tuberosum)okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)Oryza sativat0
Outcome
on-farm generated organic manures are usede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this sys- tem can be profitable under organic farming only when on-farm generated organic manures are used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2719–2825 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)potato (Solanum tuberosum)okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–166 · show in text ↑

storage · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

fertilization · soil: biology · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

99 papers: 88 positive, 11 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

993 papers: 932 positive, 61 negative or no effect

931 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

989 papers more in this group

See all 993 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.