Paper · 2017 · Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical

Physiological characteristics of grapevine under irrigation and fertilization management1

Victor Pimenta Martins de Andrade; José Aliçandro Bezerra da Silva; José Sebastião Costa de Sousa; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT The viticulture in the semiarid region of Brazil stands out in the country due to the expansion of its cultivated area and increased production, especially in the sub-mid São Francisco Valley. However, the supplying of water and an efficient replacement of nutrients to the soil are essential for these crops, due to the intrinsic climatic conditions of this region, such as low rainfall and high evapotranspiration. This study aimed at evaluating the physiological characteristics of ‘Itália’ grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) under irrigation and fertilization management. The experiment was conducted in a randomized block design, with four replications, in a split-plot arrangement, with four irrigation water depths (0.75, 1.00, 1.25 and 1.5 times the crop coefficient) in the plots and four fertilizer rates (100 %, 75 %, 50 % and 25 %, based on the recommended fertilizer rates for this crop) in the subplots, with addition of organic compounds. The leaf water potential, leaf chlorophyll content, relative water content, photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, internal CO2 partial pressure, leaf temperature and biomass accumulation in the berries were evaluated. The highest leaf chlorophyll contents were found in treatments with fertilizer rates of 70-85 %. Stomatal conductance decreased with the increasing irrigation water depths, thus reducing the internal CO2 partial pressure and increasing the leaf temperature and air vapor pressure deficit. The reduction of 25 % in the conventional fertilization and irrigation of 135 % of the recommended coefficient resulted in the highest average weight of berries. The highest yields were obtained with the lowest irrigation water depths and fertilizer rates of 50-65 %.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer rates of 70-85 % produced the highest leaf chlorophyll content.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
fertilizer rates of 70-85 %e0
Outcome
leaf chlorophyll contentse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
70-85 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest leaf chlorophyll contents were found in treatments with fertilizer rates of 70-85 %.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1272 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–42 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal conductance fell with increasing irrigation depth.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
increasing irrigation water depthse0
Outcome
Stomatal conductancee0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stomatal conductance decreased with the increasing irrigation water depths”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1347 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–42 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation depth reduced internal CO2 partial pressure.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
increasing irrigation water depthse0
Outcome
internal CO2 partial pressuree0
Direction
reducinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing irrigation water depths, thus reducing the internal CO2 partial pressure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1396 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–42 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation depth raised leaf temperature.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
increasing irrigation water depthse0
Outcome
leaf temperaturee0
Direction
increasinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing irrigation water depths, thus reducing the internal CO2 partial pressure and increasing the leaf temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1432 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–42 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation depth raised air vapor pressure deficit.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
increasing irrigation water depthse0
Outcome
air vapor pressure deficite0
Direction
increasinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing irrigation water depths, thus reducing the internal CO2 partial pressure and increasing the leaf temperature and air vapor pressure deficit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1463 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 25 % reduction in fertilization and irrigation at 135 % produced the highest average berry weight.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
reduction of 25 % in the conventional fertilization and irrigation of 135 % of the recommended coefficiente0
Outcome
average weight of berriese0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction of 25 % in the conventional fertilization and irrigation of 135 % of the recommended coefficient resulted in the highest average weight of berries.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1465–1626 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lowest irrigation depth with 50-65 % fertilizer rates produced the highest yields.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
lowest irrigation water depths and fertilizer rates of 50-65 %e0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yields were obtained with the lowest irrigation water depths and fertilizer rates of 50-65 %.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1627–1732 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–42 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · VitisResults differ

83 papers: 52 positive, 31 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

79 papers more in this group

See all 83 papers →

fertilization · yield · VitisResults differ

107 papers: 97 positive, 10 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · VitisPositive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.