Paper · 2012 · The Lancet Global Health

Nitrogen use efficiency of tomato: Role of root system morphological traits

Sheron N. Weerasuriya

19
claims
38
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Given both the adverse effects of excess N on ecosystems and the increasing interest in sustainable food production, the breeding and selection of N-efficient cultivars is an important and effective way of increasing N use efficiency (NUE). When screening for nutrient efficient cultivars, it is necessary to identify the beneficial morphological traits of nutrient-efficient genotypes. Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) is an important crop in northern Queensland which adjoins the environmentally-sensitive Great Barrier Reef, and hence there is a need to ensure that agricultural practices minimize environmental harm. A solution culture study, using programmed nutrient addition, was conducted with four N levels (100% N [330 mM], 75% N [247.5 mM], 50% N [165 mM] and 25% N [82.5 mM]) and seven tomato cultivars (Floradade, Pinnacle, Guardian, Rouge de Marmande, Grosse Lisse [GL], Roma, and Burkers Backyard). This study showed that NUE decreased as the solution N concentration increased, with Pinnacle showing the highest NUEI (internal NUE) at all N concentrations. Shoot dry weight, total plant dry weight, root dry weight, total plant length and node number showed a significant interaction (pl0.001) between cultivar and N supply level, indicating that the effect of N supply on these traits differs between cultivars. However, as the solution N concentration increased, NUEI was not correlated with biomass production. The concentration of N in the shoot tissues (pl0.01) and root tissues (pl0.001) showed significant interactions with cultivars, indicating the genotypic variation in N acquisition in tomato cultivars in response to N supply. Thus, this study demonstrated that the level of N-supply influences the root and shoot morphological traits and that these can influence NUE.The root morphology of these seven tomato cultivars was then compared to identify any genotypic variation and their effects on NUE. This study was conducted in soil-based rhizoboxes with an adequate nutrient supply under fully-controlled conditions. After six weeks, the dense root growth made assessing root system traits difficult. However, by this time, considerable differences in root morphology were evident. The seven cultivars showed significant differences in total root length (pl0.001), surface area (pl0.001), average diameter (pl0.05), shoot root ratio (pl0.05), and shoot N concentration (pl0.001) demonstrating genotypic variation in the capability of exploring the soil volume. The N concentration within the plant increased as the root length increased, thereby indicating a relationship between root length and N acquisition ability. Despite having a greater root length, and higher plant N concentration, GL, Roma and Floradade had lower NUEs than the other cultivars indicating that NUE is not only dependant upon root traits but also upon other factors such as physiological efficiency.Pinnacle and Roma showed a higher NUE compared to GL and there was no significant variation of NUE in response to N supply levels in the second experiment done in soil-based rhizoboxes with 100% (full strength) and 50% (half strength) N supply harvested at three different maturity levels (second week, third week and fourth week after planting). For all three cultivars (Pinnacle, Roma, and GL), both total root length and total root surface were higher at 50% N than at 100% N. Romashowed the highest total root length and total surface area, being higher (pl0.05) than for GL and Pinnacle at all harvesting intervals. The length of roots in all diameter classes of all three cultivars increased with decreasing N level. Similarly, the length of fine roots (l 2 mm) increased with decreasing N in a manner similar to the increase in total root length, with the magnitude of the increase ranging from approximately 25% to 50%. The shoot to root ratio was lower in the 50% N treatment than in the 100% N treatment for all cultivars at all harvesting intervals. Because of having a greater adjustability to N-stress, it was hypothesised that Pinnacle and Roma would have a higher recovery efficiency (N concentration in plant) at low N. However, Roma and GL had the highest recovery efficiencies at both low and high N at all harvesting intervals. Thus, in the present study, the adjustability of root traits in response to N stress did not necessarily correspond to enhanced recovery efficiencies. However, it appears that the cultivars were able to increase recovery efficiency through root adjustment when they are under N stress.This study aimed to investigate whether changes in root morphological traits in tomato cultivars could be used to select N-efficient cultivars for future breeding programmes. Though root morphology was indeed observed to change in response to N stress, cultivars with different N efficiency levels could not be clearly identified under the current experimental condition . However, the cultivars showed variation in root morphology (and recovery efficiency) when exposed to N stress, thereby demonstrating the importance of root morphology traits for N efficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In tomato, nitrogen use efficiency decreased as the solution N concentration increased.

Treatment
solution N concentratione0
Outcome
NUEe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NUE decreased as the solution N concentration increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–998 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among the tomato cultivars, Pinnacle had the highest internal NUE (NUEI) at all N concentrations.

Material
Pinnaclee0
Outcome
NUEIe0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pinnacle showing the highest NUEI (internal NUE) at all N concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1077 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot dry weight, total plant dry weight, root dry weight, total plant length and node number showed a significant cultivar by N supply level interaction in tomato (direction not stated).

Treatment
N supply levele0
Outcome
Shoot dry weight, total plant dry weight, root dry weight, total plant length and node numbere0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot dry weight, total plant dry weight, root dry weight, total plant length and node number showed a significant interaction (pl0.001) between cultivar and N supply level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1251 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The N concentration in shoot tissues (p<0.01) and root tissues (p<0.001) showed significant interactions with cultivar in tomato, indicating genotypic variation in N acquisition.

Organ / stage
shoot tissuese0
Outcome
concentration of Ne0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The concentration of N in the shoot tissues (pl0.01) and root tissues (pl0.001) showed significant interactions with cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1436–1562 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

As the solution N concentration increased, NUEI was not correlated with biomass production in tomato.

Treatment
solution N concentratione0
Outcome
NUEIe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“as the solution N concentration increased, NUEI was not correlated with biomass production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1434 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The seven tomato cultivars differed significantly in total root length, surface area, average diameter, shoot root ratio and shoot N concentration.

Outcome
total root lengthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The seven cultivars showed significant differences in total root length (pl0.001), surface area (pl0.001), average diameter (pl0.05), shoot root ratio (pl0.05), and shoot N concentration (pl0.001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2217–2413 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant N concentration increased as root length increased in the tomato cultivars.

Organ / stage
roote0
Outcome
N concentration within the plante0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The N concentration within the plant increased as the root length increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2496–2571 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GL, Roma and Floradade had lower NUEs than the other cultivars despite greater root length and higher plant N concentration.

Material
GL, Roma and Floradadee0
Outcome
NUEse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
the other cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GL, Roma and Floradade had lower NUEs than the other cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2726–2788 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pinnacle and Roma showed a higher NUE than GL in the soil-based rhizobox experiment.

Material
Pinnacle and Romae0
Outcome
NUEe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
GLe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pinnacle and Roma showed a higher NUE compared to GL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2909–2961 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NUE showed no significant variation in response to N supply levels (100% and 50% N) in the second, rhizobox experiment.

Treatment
N supply levelse0
Outcome
NUEe0
Direction
no significant variatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no significant variation of NUE in response to N supply levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2966–3038 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For Pinnacle, Roma and GL, total root length and total root surface were higher at 50% N than at 100% N.

Treatment
50% Ne0
Outcome
total root length and total root surfacee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
100% Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For all three cultivars (Pinnacle, Roma, and GL), both total root length and total root surface were higher at 50% N than at 100% N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3256–3387 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Roma showed the highest total root length and total surface area, significantly higher (p<0.05) than GL and Pinnacle at all harvesting intervals.

Material
Romae0
Outcome
total root length and total surface areae0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
GL and Pinnaclee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Romashowed the highest total root length and total surface area, being higher (pl0.05) than for GL and Pinnacle at all harvesting intervals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3389–3528 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The length of roots in all diameter classes of the three cultivars increased with decreasing N level.

Treatment
decreasing N levele0
Outcome
length of roots in all diameter classese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The length of roots in all diameter classes of all three cultivars increased with decreasing N level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3530–3630 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The length of fine roots (<2 mm) increased with decreasing N, similarly to total root length, by approximately 25% to 50%.

Treatment
decreasing Ne0
Outcome
length of fine rootse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
approximately 25% to 50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the length of fine roots (l 2 mm) increased with decreasing N in a manner similar to the increase in total root length, with the magnitude of the increase ranging from approximately 25% to 50%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3643–3835 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The shoot to root ratio was lower in the 50% N treatment than in the 100% N treatment for all cultivars at all harvesting intervals.

Treatment
50% N treatmente0
Outcome
shoot to root ratioe0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
100% N treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The shoot to root ratio was lower in the 50% N treatment than in the 100% N treatment for all cultivars at all harvesting intervals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3837–3968 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Roma and GL had the highest recovery efficiencies at both low and high N at all harvesting intervals.

Material
Roma and GLe0
Outcome
recovery efficienciese0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Roma and GL had the highest recovery efficiencies at both low and high N at all harvesting intervals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4154–4254 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The adjustability of root traits in response to N stress did not necessarily correspond to enhanced recovery efficiencies.

Treatment
N stresse0
Outcome
enhanced recovery efficienciese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the adjustability of root traits in response to N stress did not necessarily correspond to enhanced recovery efficiencies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4284–4405 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

It appears that the cultivars were able to increase recovery efficiency through root adjustment under N stress.

Treatment
N stresse0
Outcome
recovery efficiencye0
Qualifier
root adjustmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it appears that the cultivars were able to increase recovery efficiency through root adjustment when they are under N stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4416–4540 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars with different N efficiency levels could not be clearly identified under the current experimental condition.

Outcome
cultivars with different N efficiency levels could not be clearly identifiede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cultivars with different N efficiency levels could not be clearly identified under the current experimental condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4794–4911 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 10 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.