Paper · 2017 · ORYZA- An International Journal on Rice

Effect of weed management practices on yield and yield attributes of wet direct seeded rice under lowland ecosystem of Assam

BS Satapathy; B. Duary; Sushanta Saha; et al.

10
claims
17
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiment was conducted at Agricultural Farm of the Regional Rainfed Lowland Rice Research Institute, Gerua, Assam during early ahu (summer) season of 2015 and 2016 to study the influence of different weed management practices on yield and yield attributes of wet direct seeded rice sown through drum seeder. The dominant weed flora in the experimental field consisted of sedges Cyperus difformis L., Scirpus incurvatus Roxb., grasses Leptochloa chinensis L., Echinochloa glabrescens, Echinochloa colona L. and broad-leaved weed Ludwigia adscendes L. The composition of grasses, sedges and broad-leaved weeds in weedy check plot at 60 DAS was 15.1, 71.5 and 13.4%, respectively. There was 37.3% reduction in the grain yield of rice due to competition with weeds in the weedy plots. All the weed control treatments significantly reduced weed population, dry matter and increased grain yield of rice compared to weedy check. Hand weeding twice recorded grain yield of 5.64 t ha−1 resulting in 54.5% increase over weedy check. Mechanical weeding followed by one hand weeding recorded reduction in grain yield of 9.2% over hand weeding twice. Application of flucetosulfuron at 25 g ha−1 (5.42 t ha−1), bispyribac sodium at 30 g ha−1 (5.40 t ha−1), azimsulfuron at 35 g ha−1(5.38 t ha−1) and bensulfuron methyl+pretilachlor at 60+600 g ha −1 recorded grain yield on par with the hand weeding twice. Tank mix application of azimsulfuron+bispyribac sodium recorded 2.2% and 1.9% only, increase in grain yield over its single application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed competition reduced grain yield 37.3%.

Treatment
competition with weedse0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
37.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was 37.3% reduction in the grain yield of rice due to competition with weeds in the weedy plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–788 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed controls reduced weed population and dry matter.

Treatment
weed control treatmentse0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed population, dry mattere0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the weed control treatments significantly reduced weed population, dry matter and increased grain yield of rice compared to weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–929 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed controls increased rice grain yield.

Treatment
weed control treatmentse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the weed control treatments significantly reduced weed population, dry matter and increased grain yield of rice compared to weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–929 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twice hand weeding yielded 5.64 t ha−1, 54.5% above weedy check.

Treatment
Hand weeding twicee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
5.64 t ha−1e0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hand weeding twice recorded grain yield of 5.64 t ha−1 resulting in 54.5% increase over weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1030 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanical then hand weeding reduced yield 9.2% against twice hand weeding.

Treatment
Mechanical weeding followed by one hand weedinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
9.2%e0
Comparator
hand weeding twicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mechanical weeding followed by one hand weeding recorded reduction in grain yield of 9.2% over hand weeding twice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1145 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flucetosulfuron yielded 5.42 t ha−1 on par with hand weeding twice.

Treatment
flucetosulfuron at 25 g ha−1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
on pare0
Value
5.42 t ha−1e0
Comparator
hand weeding twicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of flucetosulfuron at 25 g ha−1 (5.42 t ha−1), bispyribac sodium at 30 g ha−1 (5.40 t ha−1), azimsulfuron at 35 g ha−1(5.38 t ha−1) and bensulfuron methyl+pretilachlor at 60+600 g ha −1 recorded grain yield on par with the hand weeding twice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1400 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bispyribac sodium yielded 5.40 t ha−1 on par with hand weeding twice.

Treatment
bispyribac sodium at 30 g ha−1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
on pare0
Value
5.40 t ha−1e0
Comparator
hand weeding twicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of flucetosulfuron at 25 g ha−1 (5.42 t ha−1), bispyribac sodium at 30 g ha−1 (5.40 t ha−1), azimsulfuron at 35 g ha−1(5.38 t ha−1) and bensulfuron methyl+pretilachlor at 60+600 g ha −1 recorded grain yield on par with the hand weeding twice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1400 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azimsulfuron yielded 5.38 t ha−1 on par with hand weeding twice.

Treatment
azimsulfuron at 35 g ha−1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
on pare0
Value
5.38 t ha−1e0
Comparator
hand weeding twicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of flucetosulfuron at 25 g ha−1 (5.42 t ha−1), bispyribac sodium at 30 g ha−1 (5.40 t ha−1), azimsulfuron at 35 g ha−1(5.38 t ha−1) and bensulfuron methyl+pretilachlor at 60+600 g ha −1 recorded grain yield on par with the hand weeding twice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1400 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The bensulfuron methyl plus pretilachlor treatment yielded on par with twice hand weeding.

Treatment
bensulfuron methyl+pretilachlor at 60+600 g ha −1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
on pare0
Comparator
hand weeding twicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bensulfuron methyl+pretilachlor at 60+600 g ha −1 recorded grain yield on par with the hand weeding twice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1400 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azimsulfuron plus bispyribac sodium tank mix raised yield 2.2% over single application.

Treatment
azimsulfuron+bispyribac sodiume0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
2.2%e0
Comparator
single applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tank mix application of azimsulfuron+bispyribac sodium recorded 2.2% and 1.9% only, increase in grain yield over its single application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1537 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–91 · show in text ↑

bispyribac-sodium · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

170 papers: 161 positive, 9 negative or no effect

160 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

166 papers more in this group

See all 170 papers →

sodium atom · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

azimsulfuron · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 35 positive, 5 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

Flucetosulfuron · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

bensulfuron · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

competition · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

47 papers: 4 positive, 43 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

herbicide · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

603 papers: 579 positive, 24 negative or no effect

578 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

599 papers more in this group

See all 603 papers →

herbicide · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

802 papers: 725 positive, 77 negative or no effect

724 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

798 papers more in this group

See all 802 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.