Paper · 2015 · Journal of Applied and Natural Science

Effect of seaweed saps on growth, yield, nutrient uptake and economic improvement of maize (sweet corn)

Ashok Pal; Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi; Pradip Kumar Maurya; et al.

14
claims
42
verbatim quotes
36
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the rabi season of 2012-13 at Research cum Instructional Farm of Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) to study the effects of seaweed saps on growth, yield, nutrient uptake and economic of maize (sweet corn) in Matasi soil of Chhattisgarh. The foliar spray of two different species (namely Kappaphycus and Gracilaria) was applied thrice at different interval of crop with different concentrations (0, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, 10.0 and 15% v/v) of seaweed extracts. Foliar applications of seaweed extract significantly enhanced the growth, yield, nutrient uptake and B:C ratio parameters. The green cob yield (189.97 q ha-1) and fodder yield (345.19 q ha-1) were recorded highest under treatment (T8) 15% G Sap + recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) which was significant similar with treatment 15% K Sap + RDF (185.24 q ha-1) in case of green cob yield. The highest N, P and K uptake by green cob and fodder were observed under 15% G Sap + RDF (T8). Treatment 15% G Sap + RDF (T8), recorded maximum gross return (Rs. 2,07,230 ha-1), net return (Rs. 1,38,756 ha-1) and B:C ratio (2.0), which was followed by treatment 15% K Sap + RDF (T4) with net return (Rs. 1,33,199 ha-1) and B:C ratio (1.95). Treatment 15% G Sap + RDF (T8) gave Rs. 45,996 ha-1 more as compared to Water spray + RDF (T9).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seaweed extract enhanced growth.

Taxon
maize (sweet corn)Zea mayst0
Treatment
Foliar applications of seaweed extracte0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar applications of seaweed extract significantly enhanced the growth, yield, nutrient uptake and B:C ratio parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–639 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (sweet corn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–103 · show in text ↑
t1

“maize (sweet corn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seaweed extract enhanced yield.

Taxon
maize (sweet corn)Zea mayst0
Treatment
Foliar applications of seaweed extracte0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar applications of seaweed extract significantly enhanced the growth, yield, nutrient uptake and B:C ratio parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–639 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (sweet corn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–103 · show in text ↑
t1

“maize (sweet corn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seaweed extract enhanced nutrient uptake.

Taxon
maize (sweet corn)Zea mayst0
Treatment
Foliar applications of seaweed extracte0
Outcome
nutrient uptakee0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar applications of seaweed extract significantly enhanced the growth, yield, nutrient uptake and B:C ratio parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–639 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (sweet corn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–103 · show in text ↑
t1

“maize (sweet corn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seaweed extract enhanced benefit-cost ratio.

Taxon
maize (sweet corn)Zea mayst0
Treatment
Foliar applications of seaweed extracte0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar applications of seaweed extract significantly enhanced the growth, yield, nutrient uptake and B:C ratio parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–639 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (sweet corn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–103 · show in text ↑
t1

“maize (sweet corn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 yielded the highest green cob yield, 189.97 q ha-1.

Taxon
maize (sweet corn)Zea mayst0
Treatment
15% G Sap + recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF)e0
Outcome
green cob yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
189.97 q ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“green cob yield (189.97 q ha-1) and fodder yield (345.19 q ha-1) were recorded highest under treatment (T8) 15% G Sap + recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–801 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (sweet corn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–103 · show in text ↑
t1

“maize (sweet corn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 yielded the highest fodder yield, 345.19 q ha-1.

Taxon
maize (sweet corn)Zea mayst0
Treatment
15% G Sap + recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF)e0
Outcome
fodder yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
345.19 q ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“green cob yield (189.97 q ha-1) and fodder yield (345.19 q ha-1) were recorded highest under treatment (T8) 15% G Sap + recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–801 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (sweet corn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–103 · show in text ↑
t1

“maize (sweet corn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 15% K Sap plus RDF treatment produced a statistically similar green cob yield of 185.24 q ha-1.

Taxon
maize (sweet corn)Zea mayst0
Treatment
15% K Sap + RDFe0
Outcome
green cob yielde0
Value
185.24 q ha-1e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“15% K Sap + RDF (185.24 q ha-1) in case of green cob yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–905 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (sweet corn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–103 · show in text ↑
t1

“maize (sweet corn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 had the highest N, P and K uptake in green cobs and fodder.

Taxon
maize (sweet corn)Zea mayst0
Treatment
15% G Sap + RDF (T8)e0
Outcome
N, P and K uptake by green cob and foddere0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest N, P and K uptake by green cob and fodder were observed under 15% G Sap + RDF (T8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1001 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (sweet corn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–103 · show in text ↑
t1

“maize (sweet corn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–103 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 produced maximum gross returns of Rs. 2,07,230 ha-1.

Taxon
maize (sweet corn)Zea mayst0
Outcome
gross returne0
Direction
maximume0
Value
Rs. 2,07,230 ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum gross return (Rs. 2,07,230 ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1084 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (sweet corn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–103 · show in text ↑
t1

“maize (sweet corn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–103 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 produced maximum net returns of Rs. 1,38,756 ha-1.

Taxon
maize (sweet corn)Zea mayst0
Outcome
net returne0
Value
Rs. 1,38,756 ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“net return (Rs. 1,38,756 ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1116 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (sweet corn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–103 · show in text ↑
t1

“maize (sweet corn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–103 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 produced a B:C ratio of 2.0.

Taxon
maize (sweet corn)Zea mayst0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Value
2.0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B:C ratio (2.0)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1136 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (sweet corn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–103 · show in text ↑
t1

“maize (sweet corn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–103 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 produced net returns of Rs. 1,33,199 ha-1.

Taxon
maize (sweet corn)Zea mayst0
Treatment
15% K Sap + RDF (T4)e0
Outcome
net returne0
Value
Rs. 1,33,199 ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“15% K Sap + RDF (T4) with net return (Rs. 1,33,199 ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1226 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (sweet corn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–103 · show in text ↑
t1

“maize (sweet corn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–103 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 produced a B:C ratio of 1.95.

Taxon
maize (sweet corn)Zea mayst0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Value
1.95e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B:C ratio (1.95)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1247 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (sweet corn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–103 · show in text ↑
t1

“maize (sweet corn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 earned Rs. 45,996 ha-1 more than water spray plus RDF.

Taxon
maize (sweet corn)Zea mayst0
Treatment
15% G Sap + RDF (T8)e0
Outcome
Rs. 45,996 ha-1 moree0
Direction
moree0
Value
Rs. 45,996 ha-1e0
Comparator
Water spray + RDF (T9)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“15% G Sap + RDF (T8) gave Rs. 45,996 ha-1 more as compared to Water spray + RDF (T9)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1343 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (sweet corn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–103 · show in text ↑
t1

“maize (sweet corn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–103 · show in text ↑

other · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

119 papers: 107 positive, 12 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

115 papers more in this group

See all 119 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 151 positive, 10 negative or no effect

150 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

157 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

other · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

184 papers: 164 positive, 20 negative or no effect

163 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

180 papers more in this group

See all 184 papers →

other · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

253 papers: 221 positive, 32 negative or no effect

220 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

249 papers more in this group

See all 253 papers →

application · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

337 papers: 310 positive, 27 negative or no effect

309 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

333 papers more in this group

See all 337 papers →

application · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

629 papers: 575 positive, 54 negative or no effect

574 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

625 papers more in this group

See all 629 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,164 papers: 1,026 positive, 138 negative or no effect

1,025 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,160 papers more in this group

See all 1,164 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.