Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Seaweed extract enhanced nutrient uptake.

A claim from Effect of seaweed saps on growth, yield, nutrient uptake and economic improvement of maize (sweet corn) · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seaweed extract enhanced nutrient uptake.

Taxon
maize (sweet corn)Zea mayst0
Treatment
Foliar applications of seaweed extracte0
Outcome
nutrient uptakee0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar applications of seaweed extract significantly enhanced the growth, yield, nutrient uptake and B:C ratio parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–639
t0

“maize (sweet corn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–103
t1

“maize (sweet corn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–103

Title

Effect of seaweed saps on growth, yield, nutrient uptake and economic improvement of maize (sweet corn)

Ashok Pal; Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi; Pradip Kumar Maurya; et al. Journal of Applied and Natural Science 2015. doi:10.31018/jans.v7i2.716

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-caa0f5c4e7ac616972fe77ec24e11f8bfa19ab0d9e3699d7c909e0389374cda6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

other · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

119 papers: 107 positive, 12 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

110 papers more in this group

See all 119 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 151 positive, 10 negative or no effect

150 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

152 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.