Paper · 2017 · Assiut Journal of Agricultural Sciences/Assuit Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Effect of Irrigation with Shallow Ground Water Salinity and Nitrogen Fertilization on Four Wheat Genotypes

Hassanien, H. G.; Abd El-Razek, M.; El-Sayed, M. H.; et al.

7
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This study was conducted on three different locations in El-Kharga Oasis, New Valley Governorate, Egypt, using four genotypes of wheat (Okas, 6, 14 and Sakha 93) during two successful growth winter seasons of 2012/13 and 2013/14. The soils of the locations were irrigated with shallow groundwater of different salinity (2.0, 5.2 and 10.7 dS.m-1) for Loc1, Loc2 and Loc3 respectively. Nitrogen fertilizer was applied at rates of 288 Kg N/Ha and 360 Kg N/Ha of the recommended N doses (288 Kg/Ha). The obtained results indicated that increasing water salinity from 2 to 5.2 and 10.7 dS.m-1 decreased significantly (P<0.05) the grain and straw yields of wheat by 6.1 and 4.9% for loc2 and by 47.4 and 22.4% for Loc3compared with loc1 respectively. The results also show that genotype-6 was more salinity tolerant than variety Sakha 93, Okas and 14 genotypes. The application of 360 Kg N/Ha fertilizer was significant enhanced the grain and straw yields of wheat genotypes. The data also, show that fertilization of genotype-6 with 360 Kg N/Ha to result in greatest grain yield of wheat under saline conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At Loc2, greater water salinity decreased wheat grain yield by 6.1% relative to Loc1.

Treatment
increasing water salinity from 2 to 5.2 and 10.7 dS.m-1e0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
6.1e0
Comparator
loc1e0
Setting
loc2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing water salinity from 2 to 5.2 and 10.7 dS.m-1 decreased significantly (P<0.05) the grain and straw yields of wheat by 6.1 and 4.9% for loc2 and by 47.4 and 22.4% for Loc3compared with loc1 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–743 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At Loc2, greater water salinity decreased wheat straw yield by 4.9% relative to Loc1.

Treatment
increasing water salinity from 2 to 5.2 and 10.7 dS.m-1e0
Outcome
straw yieldse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
4.9%e0
Comparator
loc1e0
Setting
loc2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing water salinity from 2 to 5.2 and 10.7 dS.m-1 decreased significantly (P<0.05) the grain and straw yields of wheat by 6.1 and 4.9% for loc2 and by 47.4 and 22.4% for Loc3compared with loc1 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–743 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At Loc3, greater water salinity decreased wheat grain yield by 47.4% relative to Loc1.

Treatment
increasing water salinity from 2 to 5.2 and 10.7 dS.m-1e0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
47.4e0
Comparator
loc1e0
Setting
Loc3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing water salinity from 2 to 5.2 and 10.7 dS.m-1 decreased significantly (P<0.05) the grain and straw yields of wheat by 6.1 and 4.9% for loc2 and by 47.4 and 22.4% for Loc3compared with loc1 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–743 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At Loc3, greater water salinity decreased wheat straw yield by 22.4% relative to Loc1.

Treatment
increasing water salinity from 2 to 5.2 and 10.7 dS.m-1e0
Outcome
straw yieldse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
22.4%e0
Comparator
loc1e0
Setting
Loc3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing water salinity from 2 to 5.2 and 10.7 dS.m-1 decreased significantly (P<0.05) the grain and straw yields of wheat by 6.1 and 4.9% for loc2 and by 47.4 and 22.4% for Loc3compared with loc1 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–743 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype-6 was more salinity tolerant than Sakha 93, Okas and 14.

Material
genotype-6e0
Outcome
salinity tolerante0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
variety Sakha 93, Okas and 14 genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genotype-6 was more salinity tolerant than variety Sakha 93, Okas and 14 genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–854 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 360 Kg N/Ha significantly enhanced wheat grain and straw yields.

Treatment
360 Kg N/Ha fertilizere0
Outcome
grain and straw yieldse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 360 Kg N/Ha fertilizer was significant enhanced the grain and straw yields of wheat genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–969 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype-6 fertilized at 360 Kg N/Ha had the greatest grain yield under saline conditions.

Material
genotype-6e0
Treatment
360 Kg N/Hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
greateste0
Qualifier
under saline conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilization of genotype-6 with 360 Kg N/Ha to result in greatest grain yield of wheat under saline conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1107 · show in text ↑

salinity · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

227 papers: 30 positive, 197 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

223 papers more in this group

See all 227 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.