Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during two consecutive years of kharif 2015-16 and 2016-17 at Soil Conservation and Water Management Farm of the C. S. Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur to find out the effect of cropping systems and moisture conservation practices on growth, yield and economics of crops under rainfed condition. The treatments comprised of 6 cropping systems i.e. (i) Sole pigeonpea at 60cm by regular sowing (ii) Sole pigeonpea paired 40/80 (iii) Sole sorghum at 45 cm by regular sowing (iv) Sole urdbean at 45 cm by regular sowing (v) Pigeonpea + sorghum - paired sowing. 40/80 and (vi) Pigeonpea + urdbean - paired sowing40/80 ; 3 moisture conservation practices i.e. (i) Contol (ii) Ridging and furrowing in between the crop rows after three weeks of sowing and (iii) Weeding and hoeing once at 35 DAS the crop rows were tested in Split plot design with 3 replications during the course of investigation envisages. Results obtained that the growth and yield of individual crop depressed in additive intercropping where depression was more in sorghum than blackgram. The yields of pigeonpea, sorghum and urdbean were highest in their sole stands. The yield of sole and intercropped sorghum and urdbean in terms of pigeonpea biological seed yield showed significant variation, whereas Pigeonpea + urdbean - (paired sowing 40/80) brought out significantly the highest production as compared to other cropping systems. The increase in seed yield due to Pigeonpea + urdbean paired treatment over conventional practice. The growth characters and yield attributes of three crops followed almost similar pattern of seed yield. Weeding and hoeing once at 35 DAS resulted in slightly delayed maturity of crops over control. The higher splash loss was observed under conventional practice over ridging and furrowing practice during both the years of experimentation.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Additive intercropping depressed individual crop growth and yield.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajant0 - Treatment
- additive intercroppinge0
- Outcome
- growth and yield of individual crope0
- Direction
- depressede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“growth and yield of individual crop depressed in additive intercropping”
t0“pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
The depression under additive intercropping was greater for sorghum than blackgram.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Outcome
- depressione0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- blackgrame0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“depression was more in sorghum than blackgram”
t0“pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Pigeonpea yield was highest in sole stands.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- sole standse0
- Outcome
- yields of pigeonpeae0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The yields of pigeonpea, sorghum and urdbean were highest in their sole stands.”
t0“pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Sorghum yield was highest in sole stands.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- sole standse0
- Outcome
- sorghume0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The yields of pigeonpea, sorghum and urdbean were highest in their sole stands.”
t0“pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Urdbean yield was highest in sole stands.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- sole standse0
- Outcome
- urdbeane0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The yields of pigeonpea, sorghum and urdbean were highest in their sole stands.”
t0“pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Sorghum and urdbean yields expressed as pigeonpea biological seed yield varied significantly.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Outcome
- pigeonpea biological seed yielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The yield of sole and intercropped sorghum and urdbean in terms of pigeonpea biological seed yield showed significant variation”
t0“pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Paired pigeonpea and urdbean sowing had the highest production among cropping systems.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- Pigeonpea + urdbean - (paired sowing 40/80)e0
- Outcome
- productione0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- other cropping systemse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pigeonpea + urdbean - (paired sowing 40/80) brought out significantly the highest production as compared to other cropping systems.”
t0“pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Paired pigeonpea and urdbean sowing increased seed yield over conventional practice.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- Pigeonpea + urdbean paired treatmente0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- conventional practicee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The increase in seed yield due to Pigeonpea + urdbean paired treatment over conventional practice.”
t0“pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Growth characters and yield attributes followed the seed yield pattern.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Outcome
- growth characters and yield attributese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The growth characters and yield attributes of three crops followed almost similar pattern of seed yield.”
t0“pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Weeding and hoeing at 35 DAS slightly delayed crop maturity relative to control.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- Weeding and hoeing once at 35 DASe0
- Outcome
- maturity of cropse0
- Direction
- delayede0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Weeding and hoeing once at 35 DAS resulted in slightly delayed maturity of crops over control.”
t0“pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Splash loss was higher with conventional practice than with ridging and furrowing.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- conventional practicee0
- Outcome
- splash losse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- ridging and furrowing practicee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The higher splash loss was observed under conventional practice over ridging and furrowing practice during both the years of experimentation.”
t0“pigeonpea”
The same questions in other papers
Vigna mungo · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results
19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →intercropping · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results differ
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 94 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
113 papers more in this group
See all 117 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.