Paper · 2018 · Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences

Comparison of Foliar Verses Soil Application of Micronutrients on the Production of Wheat (Triticum aestivum. L) Crop.

Arshad Ali Kaleri; Mukesh Kumar Soothar; Barkat Ali; et al.

11
claims
26
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The present work was laid out to compare the effect of foliar verses soil application of micronutrients on the production of wheat crop at experimental side of southern wheat station Agriculture Research Institute Tandojam, during Rabi season 2016. There were ten fertilizer treatments viz T1= K2%, T2= 1% Zn, T3= B 0.2%, T4= Cu 2%, T5= Mg 1% as foliar application while T6= 6Kg Zn ha-1, T7= 3.5Kg B ha-1 (Borax) T8= 5Kg Cu ha-1 (CuSo4), untreated T9 tried with an standard dose of 230-115 Kg and NP ha-1 was (T10). The experiment was laid out in three replicated Randomized Complete Block Design. It was observed that plant height, tillers plant-1, spike length, grains spike-1, 1000 grain weight and grain yield ha-1 differed significant between all the treatments. Soil application of 6 Kg ha-1 Zn gave maximum grain yield of 5113.33 Kg ha-1, this increscent in yield was associated with significant increase in tillers plant-1 of 20.81.Spike length of 13.84 cm, grain spike-1 of 71.95 and 1000 seed weight was 68.66 respectively. It is concluded that soil application of micronutrients were relatively more effective than foliar application in local soil condition. Among the micronutrients Zn applied at 6 Kg ha-1, followed by 3 Kg Mg ha-1 and 3.5 Kg B ha-1 gave higher grain yield due to increased values in all yield related parameters.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat growth and yield traits differed significantly among treatments.

Outcome
plant height, tillers plant-1, spike lengthe0
Direction
differede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height, tillers plant-1, spike length, grains spike-1, 1000 grain weight and grain yield ha-1 differed significant between all the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–766 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–89 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain and yield traits differed significantly among treatments.

Outcome
grains spike-1, 1000 grain weight and grain yield ha-1e0
Direction
differede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height, tillers plant-1, spike length, grains spike-1, 1000 grain weight and grain yield ha-1 differed significant between all the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–766 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil Zn at 6 Kg ha-1 produced maximum grain yield of 5113.33 Kg ha-1.

Treatment
Soil application of 6 Kg ha-1 Zne0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
5113.33 Kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil application of 6 Kg ha-1 Zn gave maximum grain yield of 5113.33 Kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–844 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil Zn application increased tillers per plant to 20.81.

Treatment
Soil application of 6 Kg ha-1 Zne1
Outcome
tillers plant-1e0
Direction
increasee0
Value
20.81e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this increscent in yield was associated with significant increase in tillers plant-1 of 20.81”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–939 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soil application of 6 Kg ha-1 Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–89 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil Zn application yielded spike length of 13.84 cm.

Treatment
Soil application of 6 Kg ha-1 Zne1
Outcome
Spike lengthe0
Value
13.84 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spike length of 13.84 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–964 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soil application of 6 Kg ha-1 Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–89 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil Zn application yielded 71.95 grains per spike.

Treatment
Soil application of 6 Kg ha-1 Zne1
Outcome
grain spike-1e0
Value
71.95e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain spike-1 of 71.95”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–988 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soil application of 6 Kg ha-1 Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–89 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil Zn application yielded 1000 seed weight of 68.66.

Treatment
Soil application of 6 Kg ha-1 Zne1
Outcome
1000 seed weighte0
Value
68.66e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1000 seed weight was 68.66”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1019 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soil application of 6 Kg ha-1 Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil application of micronutrients was more effective than foliar application locally.

Treatment
soil application of micronutrientse0
Outcome
relatively more effectivee0
Direction
relatively more effectivee0
Qualifier
local soil conditione0
Comparator
foliar applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil application of micronutrients were relatively more effective than foliar application in local soil condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1168 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn at 6 Kg ha-1 gave higher grain yield.

Treatment
Zn applied at 6 Kg ha-1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zn applied at 6 Kg ha-1, followed by 3 Kg Mg ha-1 and 3.5 Kg B ha-1 gave higher grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1286 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mg at 3 Kg ha-1 gave higher grain yield.

Treatment
3 Kg Mg ha-1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zn applied at 6 Kg ha-1, followed by 3 Kg Mg ha-1 and 3.5 Kg B ha-1 gave higher grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1286 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B at 3.5 Kg ha-1 gave higher grain yield.

Treatment
3.5 Kg B ha-1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zn applied at 6 Kg ha-1, followed by 3 Kg Mg ha-1 and 3.5 Kg B ha-1 gave higher grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1286 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–89 · show in text ↑

magnesium atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

36 papers: 27 positive, 9 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.